Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pm to HuskyFanInAZ

RoadDawg55
RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,521 Swaye's Wigwam
in Hardcore Husky Board
If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134567

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    I'm saying win or get the fuck out.

    Excuses are for losers.
    Boobs miserable schtick is our (?) immutable touchstone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,521 Swaye's Wigwam
    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    That was before we lost to Cal. That is the problem. If we were struggling against LSU's defense it would be different, but Cal?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter