Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pm to HuskyFanInAZ

RoadDawg55
RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
in Hardcore Husky Board
If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,839
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    I'm saying win or get the fuck out.

    Excuses are for losers.
    Boobs miserable schtick is our (?) immutable touchstone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    That was before we lost to Cal. That is the problem. If we were struggling against LSU's defense it would be different, but Cal?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

    I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players
    Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    I didn't say that a couple of weeks ago when UW didn't score a TD against Boise State.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

    I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players
    Still doesn't take away the fact that they are so terrible that even "developing" would lead to very minimal gain.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.

    Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

    I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players
    Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?
    yep they all suck no matter what. I hate Sark as much as the next guy but this is ridiculous.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    Hi there. The players Peterman inherited mostly suck. (Although he's done a creditable job developing several veterans his predecessor had written off.) How is this an indictment of Peterman?

    So much pressing this week.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    TTJ said:

    Hi there. The players Peterman inherited mostly suck. (Although he's done a creditable job developing several veterans his predecessor had written off.) How is this an indictment of Peterman?

    So much pressing this week.

    He's the guy getting paid to do better than suck.

    It's like 2010 all over again.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,756
    RaceBannon said:

    ThomasFremont said:

    Coaching>>>>>>>>>>recruiting.

    HTH

    Brady Hoke left a steaming pile for Harbaugh

    But still, Jim is whipping them into shape


    Sorry about the racist crap

    According to the Doogs, Michigan out recruited UW BY FAR. (Macus Peters was a 3 star recruit by the way) and Harbaugh has bullets
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Empterman was a 2 star
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter