Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Pm to HuskyFanInAZ

RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
in Hardcore Husky Board
If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«134

Comments

  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,828
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    I'm saying win or get the fuck out.

    Excuses are for losers.
    Boobs miserable schtick is our (?) immutable touchstone.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    That was before we lost to Cal. That is the problem. If we were struggling against LSU's defense it would be different, but Cal?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,088
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

    I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players
    Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Fecal_Matter said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    This is the exact perfect response. It's not that we (?) don't have non-Freshman, it's that we (!) have chosen to start freshman.
    But that's not Peterman's fault because Doog logic.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    If Eldrenkamp, Brostek, and Kirkland started instead of the three freshman, what would the exuse be? Add in Lindquist instead of Browning? Sark's fault?

    Dumb. A couple of weeks ago you guys would've said it was because of Sark's shitty recruiting or development. Now everyone seems to be changing their tune.
    I didn't say that a couple of weeks ago when UW didn't score a TD against Boise State.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

    I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players
    Still doesn't take away the fact that they are so terrible that even "developing" would lead to very minimal gain.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    You can't expect to win without top tier talent at every position in the 2 deeps and the practice squad.

    Fuck off.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    What if the reason we are starting freshman is because Sarks recruits are that shitty?

    I'm hearing the NCAA allows coaches to develop inherited players
    Possible that some of the guys are unsalvageable dreck?
    yep they all suck no matter what. I hate Sark as much as the next guy but this is ridiculous.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.