If we outlaw bazookas, then only outlaws will have bazookas
Comments
-
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
-
If one wanted to knock off an armored car or blow a hole in the side of a bank to access the vault, a bazooka would be a perfectly logical weapon to accomplish the task. There is not really any other lawful use of the weapon. It is specifically designed for such crimes and destruction. Therefore, it is outlawed.OZONE said:
-
If you want to shoot up a bunch of people at school, a 9mm with a 20 round clip is a perfect weapon, therefore it is outlawed. Oh wait.PurpleThrobber said:
If one wanted to knock off an armored car or blow a hole in the side of a bank to access the vault, a bazooka would be a perfectly logical weapon to accomplish the task. There is not really any other lawful use of the weapon. It is specifically designed for such crimes and destruction. Therefore, it is outlawed.OZONE said: -
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up. -
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up. -
How about we just enforce the laws on the books before creating new ones. I keep seeing "moar background checks!!!11!!". A new gun purchase already requires a background check. And lying on the form is a felony.
-
We haven't done nothing. We have done a lot. Ozone pointed out in another thread that we need to go door to door and take all the guns and leave the government as the only body with guns.2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
Of course then the government can kill millions like Ozone's commie pals throughout history but still.
The stupid and the fearful fall for this manipulation. Not surprised that you are one of them -
Are you not aware of gun shows and private gun sales? I know a couple people that make a living selling guns on the private market. Any felon can buy a gun through those means, in most states, without a background check.Slocus said:How about we just enforce the laws on the books before creating new ones. I keep seeing "moar background checks!!!11!!". A new gun purchase already requires a background check. And lying on the form is a felony.
-
And in that case, it is incumbent upon the seller to deny a sale to a questionable person. Hey, that's a felony, too! Explain to me how you plan to enforce a background check on two people in a back alley intent on transferring a firearm for nefarious purpose.2001400ex said:
Are you not aware of gun shows and private gun sales? I know a couple people that make a living selling guns on the private market. Any felon can buy a gun through those means, in most states, without a background check.Slocus said:How about we just enforce the laws on the books before creating new ones. I keep seeing "moar background checks!!!11!!". A new gun purchase already requires a background check. And lying on the form is a felony.
-
No. It wouldn't be worth it.2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
The single most important basic natural right that we as humans have is the right to life, meaning the right to be free from aggression, and to defend oneself from others (regardless of whether the aggressor is an individual, group, or "governmental" body) by any and all means necessary.
Anything done to limit that natural right to defend oneself is wrong. -
Ozone needs to be deported
-
How long have you been debating issues with yourself?2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
Why is it both sides you argue offer fucktarded reasoning? -
but what if me and my union prawmous to take care of you?Blackie said:
No. It wouldn't be worth it.2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
The single most important basic natural right that we as humans have is the right to life, meaning the right to be free from aggression, and to defend oneself from others (regardless of whether the aggressor is an individual, group, or "governmental" body) by any and all means necessary.
Anything done to limit that natural right to defend oneself is wrong. -
In that case, you've convinced me and I'll withdraw my position.sarktastic said:
but what if me and my union prawmous to take care of you?Blackie said:
No. It wouldn't be worth it.2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
The single most important basic natural right that we as humans have is the right to life, meaning the right to be free from aggression, and to defend oneself from others (regardless of whether the aggressor is an individual, group, or "governmental" body) by any and all means necessary.
Anything done to limit that natural right to defend oneself is wrong. -
Why would anyone try to give you an answer? Your mind is made up. You like more government control in the name of safety. We get it. I'd rather do more blow than argue with someone who will NEVER change their mind. So fuck off.OZONE said:Of course people will still be able to kill.
But a depressed 22 yo won't be able to kill 11 class mates in a fit of anger without a lot of advanced planning, by which time his fit of anger may pass.
He might take out 1 or 2. But he won't take out 11.
Your response is as insufficient as the rest.
Is this all this board has? No body brighter that can answer the question? -
greenblood said:
Ozone needs
to be deporteddeath by ruru. -
Fucking storm troopers still didn't hit shit.Southerndawg said:Blackie said:
What fully automatic weapons are available the public?2001400ex said:
What about fully automatic weapons?Doogles said:
If I were to go "Postal", so to speak, I feel a bazooka would be a tactically limited option of weaponry. What's my get away plan? After I blow up the principle's office, how long will it take me to reload and finish off the gym teacher? How many missiles can my teenage angst carry?OZONE said:
Wat.Blackie said:
Because the government has gone to great lengths to obtain and maintain the upper hand on the governed.OZONE said:
This occurred to me today. Gun nuts say the same thing about guns all the time.
But if this fallacy were really true, why don't we see people running around and committing crimes today with bazookas?
We are told that if we outlaw guns, then only outlaws (criminals) will have them and the rest of us will be victimized by all of these outlaws and their guns.
But why isn't that happening today with bazookas? They are outlawed. Why aren't outlaws running around with them committing crimes? I can't remember ever hearing of it.
If I was a criminal, I'd sure as fuck want bazooka for my criminal activity.
A shotgun, a few 9mms, and a backpack full of clips seems much more practical (and cheaper! I work at lasertag i'm not a millionaire dammit!)
Most, you just have to have the right license.
https://youtu.be/9MBf_LvqUsQ -
That is some serious twisting.RaceBannon said:
We haven't done nothing. We have done a lot. Ozone pointed out in another thread that we need to go door to door and take all the guns and leave the government as the only body with guns.2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up. -
Now that's funny shit.sarktastic said:
How long have you been debating issues with yourself?2001400ex said:
Yes because doing nothing has been successful. What if we do something and it saves 20 lives. Would that be worth it to be subject to a background check prior to buying any gun?sarktastic said:
Stop trying to change the subject. This is about feel guud gun legislation to 1. Pretend we care in a personal way and 2. Pretend we've accomplished something... anything... well we have to #TRYANDDOSOMETHING!SpoonieLuv said:
good poontOZONE said:
A guy trying to hold off a classroom with a knife, probably won't have a lot of success.
I'm sure you can scale the concept up.
Why is it both sides you argue offer fucktarded reasoning? -
I mainly want fewer gun nuts out there with guns.Swaye said:
Why would anyone try to give you an answer? Your mind is made up. You like more government control in the name of safety.OZONE said:Of course people will still be able to kill.
But a depressed 22 yo won't be able to kill 11 class mates in a fit of anger without a lot of advanced planning, by which time his fit of anger may pass.
He might take out 1 or 2. But he won't take out 11.
Your response is as insufficient as the rest.
Is this all this board has? No body brighter that can answer the question?
What's your solution?
The bazooka example was just a great way to refute the tired NRA argument about only criminals having guns if we outlaw guns. -
Chicago has one of the toughest gun laws in the country, and shooting deaths are up 20%. Take your bullshit somewhere else.OZONE said:
I mainly want fewer gun nuts out there with guns.Swaye said:
Why would anyone try to give you an answer? Your mind is made up. You like more government control in the name of safety.OZONE said:Of course people will still be able to kill.
But a depressed 22 yo won't be able to kill 11 class mates in a fit of anger without a lot of advanced planning, by which time his fit of anger may pass.
He might take out 1 or 2. But he won't take out 11.
Your response is as insufficient as the rest.
Is this all this board has? No body brighter that can answer the question?
What's your solution?
The bazooka example was just a great way to refute the tired NRA argument about only criminals having guns if we outlaw guns. -
I hear Syria has tuff gun control
