Chest was right....
Comments
-
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK. -
Ty beat Harbaugh then only lost to him by 7 in 2008.
-
Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK. -
I've been saying they were going to suck and come back to the pack (Pac?) since Kenny Wheaton was at the 45 yard line. I like to be right.
-
All of this is true.HFNY said:Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success. -
dnc said:
All of this is true.HFNY said:Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.
Calling bullshit. What the fuck has Chip done without Uncle Phil???
-
More than Kasen Williams has with the Seahawks.NeGgaPlEaSe said:dnc said:
All of this is true.HFNY said:Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.
Calling bullshit. What the fuck has Chip done without Uncle Phil??? -
dnc said:
More than Kasen Williams has with the Seahawks.NeGgaPlEaSe said:dnc said:
All of this is true.HFNY said:Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.
Calling bullshit. What the fuck has Chip done without Uncle Phil???
Season's not over yet
-
Pease has nothing to work with? He's working on recruiting class number 3 here...are you waiting for all these smurf turf WRs to hit redshirt Sr year? He has nothing to work with cuz he's a dick..we knew he couldn't recruit before he showed upgodawgst said:
Not sure on wr coach as he has ZERO to work with right now, OC tbd, and yes this team can win the North next year if the O develops. other than at wr, the pieces are in place.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK. -
Boobs?NeGgaPlEaSe said:dnc said:
More than Kasen Williams has with the Seahawks.NeGgaPlEaSe said:dnc said:
All of this is true.HFNY said:Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.
Calling bullshit. What the fuck has Chip done without Uncle Phil???
Season's not over yet -
Pease has recruited reasonably well but not nabbing a big time recruit in 2014 or 2015 who could play well immediately. Lenius should've redshirted, Pettis could've redshirted too, and Renfro is the most touted guy he brought in but has the inevitable growing pains (nice catch in tight coverage but then fumbling). Something seems mentally off with Mickens because he's not playing very well.
I can't remember but I think someone here said some players in Florida thought he was a jerk? Guys that he and this staff recruited probably don't think that but Mickens probably does.
He better be working hard on getting his WR's to block better during the bye. I get that these guys (Pettis, Lenius, Renfro) are young but at least show me a little bit of improvement.devildawg said:
Pease has nothing to work with? He's working on recruiting class number 3 here...are you waiting for all these smurf turf WRs to hit redshirt Sr year? He has nothing to work with cuz he's a dick..we knew he couldn't recruit before he showed upgodawgst said:
Not sure on wr coach as he has ZERO to work with right now, OC tbd, and yes this team can win the North next year if the O develops. other than at wr, the pieces are in place.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK. -
Kelly stepped into an ideal situation after being the team's OC for 2 years while Petersen couldn't have had more of an abrupt and severe change from Sarkisian's leftovers.
Besides being an apples and oranges comparison, Petersen is a better fit at UW while Kelly would bring his NCAA baggage from his Oregon days.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
All of this is true.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.
-
Disagree.NeGgaPlEaSe said:dnc said:
More than Kasen Williams has with the Seahawks.NeGgaPlEaSe said:dnc said:
All of this is true.HFNY said:Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.
The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.dnc said:
Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.HFNY said:Meh.
Context matters.
Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).
Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.
OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.FremontTroll said:
This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.HFNY said:Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.
SteveInShelton said:
Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.
I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.
Calling bullshit. What the fuck has Chip done without Uncle Phil???
Season's not over yet -
Chip was an absolute monster at UO. He took them to a level no one else ever did and no one else is going to anytime soon. I'm not a nega Petersen yet but Chip's in the handful of automatic grand slam hires for any school (with Saban, Carroll, Urban and Harbaugh). Petersen's not.HFNY said:Kelly stepped into an ideal situation after being the team's OC for 2 years while Petersen couldn't have had more of an abrupt and severe change from Sarkisian's leftovers.
Besides being an apples and oranges comparison, Petersen is a better fit at UW while Kelly would bring his NCAA baggage from his Oregon days.
UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
-
The players hate Pease. I don't think a WR coach really matters though.HFNY said:Pease has recruited reasonably well but not nabbing a big time recruit in 2014 or 2015 who could play well immediately. Lenius should've redshirted, Pettis could've redshirted too, and Renfro is the most touted guy he brought in but has the inevitable growing pains (nice catch in tight coverage but then fumbling). Something seems mentally off with Mickens because he's not playing very well.
I can't remember but I think someone here said some players in Florida thought he was a jerk? Guys that he and this staff recruited probably don't think that but Mickens probably does.
He better be working hard on getting his WR's to block better during the bye. I get that these guys (Pettis, Lenius, Renfro) are young but at least show me a little bit of improvement.devildawg said:
Pease has nothing to work with? He's working on recruiting class number 3 here...are you waiting for all these smurf turf WRs to hit redshirt Sr year? He has nothing to work with cuz he's a dick..we knew he couldn't recruit before he showed upgodawgst said:
Not sure on wr coach as he has ZERO to work with right now, OC tbd, and yes this team can win the North next year if the O develops. other than at wr, the pieces are in place.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).
Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK. -
If youre going to plagiarize my shit fuck-o its this place is shit and your all fagsAZDuck said:This bored sucks and your all fags.
HTH
-
It's obvious just watching slingblade for 2 minutes that he's not a top coach. It's obvious by his resume he's not a top-notch coach. There's a lot of different factors. Colin Cowherd has repeatedly gone off on teams hiring the long-time or trusty assistant because he "deserves" a shot or for continuity sake. And there's a difference between "giving a guy a shot" and hiring an up-and-comer before you lose him to another school (Chip Kelly). He gives tons of examples but obviously Larry Coker is the shining example. Slingblade. Lambright. Gilby. Bill Stewart. John McLaren. Pat Knight (well, actually Bobby pulled a fast one and retired in the middle of conference play and named his son the coach haha). Bill fuckin Doba. Bob Toledo. Karl Dorrell. Just a few who come to mind.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
ThisSoutherndawg said:
Disagree. The whole fucking bored did not call it. There are more than a few diehard dooks/quooks in here, some amongst the Husky fan base.doogsinparadise said:The whole fucking bored called it, but if you want to come in here and beat your chest go right ahead, just don't expect to last very long.
There were plenty of people who thought they would stay on top for many years and beat UW until 2025.
