Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Chest was right....

13»

Comments

  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,591
    Pease has recruited reasonably well but not nabbing a big time recruit in 2014 or 2015 who could play well immediately. Lenius should've redshirted, Pettis could've redshirted too, and Renfro is the most touted guy he brought in but has the inevitable growing pains (nice catch in tight coverage but then fumbling). Something seems mentally off with Mickens because he's not playing very well.

    I can't remember but I think someone here said some players in Florida thought he was a jerk? Guys that he and this staff recruited probably don't think that but Mickens probably does.

    He better be working hard on getting his WR's to block better during the bye. I get that these guys (Pettis, Lenius, Renfro) are young but at least show me a little bit of improvement.
    devildawg said:

    godawgst said:

    UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).

    Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.

    Not sure on wr coach as he has ZERO to work with right now, OC tbd, and yes this team can win the North next year if the O develops. other than at wr, the pieces are in place.
    Pease has nothing to work with? He's working on recruiting class number 3 here...are you waiting for all these smurf turf WRs to hit redshirt Sr year? He has nothing to work with cuz he's a dick..we knew he couldn't recruit before he showed up
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 4,591
    Kelly stepped into an ideal situation after being the team's OC for 2 years while Petersen couldn't have had more of an abrupt and severe change from Sarkisian's leftovers.

    Besides being an apples and oranges comparison, Petersen is a better fit at UW while Kelly would bring his NCAA baggage from his Oregon days.
    dnc said:

    HFNY said:

    Meh.

    Context matters.

    Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).

    Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.

    OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.

    HFNY said:

    Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.

    UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).

    Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.

    Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.
    This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.
    Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.


    All of this is true.

    I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    HFNY said:

    Well we were really talking about a sample size of 5 games because someone else mentioned his games against UW.

    The thing about CFB is that basement dwelling analysts often have to operate in a limited sample environment since teams play less games than any other major sport....even more limited sample sizes against the same OOC opponent over the years.

    dnc said:

    HFNY said:

    Meh.

    Context matters.

    Petersen was @ Husky Stadium in 2007 with a rebuilding team after that amazing win against Oklahoma. It ended up being one of his worst seasons at BSU (10-3) and his QB was Taylor Tharp (Taylor who? Exactly).

    Petersen beat Sarkisian on a neutral field but then was slaughtered with a rebuilding team in 2013 @ Husky Stadium (his worst team at BSU). That 2013 team turned into a very good 2014 team that Harsin enjoyed inheriting.

    OTOH, Petersen kicked Chip Kelly's ass in Eugene (was up 37-13 going into the 4th quarter) and then embarrassed him in BSU.

    HFNY said:

    Petersen is 2-0 vs. Chip and played against him with much less talent.

    UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).

    Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.

    Does the necessary change involve Peterman bringing in Chip and then firing himself? If yes, I agree.
    This is just as dumb as the posters saying CP sucks because he is 0-1 vs. Ty and 1-1 vs. Sark.
    Yes, context matters. Any sample of two games is not enough context to matter.
    All of this is true.

    I'm still taking Chip Kelly over Chris Petersen wiff a bullet, despite Petersen's head to head success.

    Calling bullshit. What the fuck has Chip done without Uncle Phil???
    More than Kasen Williams has with the Seahawks.

    Season's not over yet
    Disagree.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    edited September 2015
    HFNY said:

    Kelly stepped into an ideal situation after being the team's OC for 2 years while Petersen couldn't have had more of an abrupt and severe change from Sarkisian's leftovers.

    Besides being an apples and oranges comparison, Petersen is a better fit at UW while Kelly would bring his NCAA baggage from his Oregon days.
    UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).

    Chip was an absolute monster at UO. He took them to a level no one else ever did and no one else is going to anytime soon. I'm not a nega Petersen yet but Chip's in the handful of automatic grand slam hires for any school (with Saban, Carroll, Urban and Harbaugh). Petersen's not.

  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    HFNY said:

    Pease has recruited reasonably well but not nabbing a big time recruit in 2014 or 2015 who could play well immediately. Lenius should've redshirted, Pettis could've redshirted too, and Renfro is the most touted guy he brought in but has the inevitable growing pains (nice catch in tight coverage but then fumbling). Something seems mentally off with Mickens because he's not playing very well.

    I can't remember but I think someone here said some players in Florida thought he was a jerk? Guys that he and this staff recruited probably don't think that but Mickens probably does.

    He better be working hard on getting his WR's to block better during the bye. I get that these guys (Pettis, Lenius, Renfro) are young but at least show me a little bit of improvement.

    devildawg said:

    godawgst said:

    UW can make a big jump next year... If peterman makes the necessary changes (New WR coach, New OC).

    Stanford loses a shit ton, Cal will lose Goff, Oregon is declining, WSU is WSU, OSU is OSU. We can win the North easily next year if we pick our shit up on offense. This shit is urgent. FUCK.

    Not sure on wr coach as he has ZERO to work with right now, OC tbd, and yes this team can win the North next year if the O develops. other than at wr, the pieces are in place.
    Pease has nothing to work with? He's working on recruiting class number 3 here...are you waiting for all these smurf turf WRs to hit redshirt Sr year? He has nothing to work with cuz he's a dick..we knew he couldn't recruit before he showed up
    The players hate Pease. I don't think a WR coach really matters though.
  • PenacePenace Member Posts: 494
    AZDuck said:

    This bored sucks and your all fags.

    If youre going to plagiarize my shit fuck-o its this place is shit and your all fags

    HTH
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180



    The whole fucking bored called it, but if you want to come in here and beat your chest go right ahead, just don't expect to last very long.

    Disagree. The whole fucking bored did not call it. There are more than a few diehard dooks/quooks in here, some amongst the Husky fan base.
    This

    There were plenty of people who thought they would stay on top for many years and beat UW until 2025.
    It's obvious just watching slingblade for 2 minutes that he's not a top coach. It's obvious by his resume he's not a top-notch coach. There's a lot of different factors. Colin Cowherd has repeatedly gone off on teams hiring the long-time or trusty assistant because he "deserves" a shot or for continuity sake. And there's a difference between "giving a guy a shot" and hiring an up-and-comer before you lose him to another school (Chip Kelly). He gives tons of examples but obviously Larry Coker is the shining example. Slingblade. Lambright. Gilby. Bill Stewart. John McLaren. Pat Knight (well, actually Bobby pulled a fast one and retired in the middle of conference play and named his son the coach haha). Bill fuckin Doba. Bob Toledo. Karl Dorrell. Just a few who come to mind.
Sign In or Register to comment.