UW coaching search & AD search
Comments
-
No.BearsWiin said:
Are you new here?Fecal_Matter said:
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times. -
Just a suggestion...you guys have enough material to keep you up past Jimmy's bedtime. You might wanna break that thing up into 2 one hour segments, Monday and Tuesday. Can't wait for this week's pod.jecornel said:
At bestNeGgaPlEaSe said:
Game management has been subparDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams. -
That was one of them thar rhetorical quereysFecal_Matter said:
No.BearsWiin said:
Are you new here?Fecal_Matter said:
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times. -
Plaigarism my shit, fucko.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Zero teams with a winning record in FBS.Muttzen said:
Utah StateDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
Sac State
Georgia State
Illinois
Hawaii
EWU
Cal
WSU
OSU
Colorado
But how is Peterman a mediocre coach? -
I like your thinkingdroggins said:
Just a suggestion...you guys have enough material to keep you up past Jimmy's bedtime. You might wanna break that thing up into 2 one hour segments, Monday and Tuesday. Can't wait for this week's pod.jecornel said:
At bestNeGgaPlEaSe said:
Game management has been subparDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams. -
We won't beat anyone of quality running the ball the rest of the year because newsflash we can't do it consistently.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A running game would be fine with those players.TTJ said:It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
Hope this helps.
We're 2-2. Had we tried to run it versus Utah State we would be 1-3.
Hope this helps. -
Do you really think with our OL, wr corp and a true freshman qb this is a 8-9 win team?RoadDawg55 said:
This is kind of true, but the offensive philosophy sucks and there is way too much cutesy bullshit going on. Right now, we should be an 8-9 win team, but Petersen is holding it back with his offense. So when the players improve we will win 8-9 when we should be winning 11+.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year. -
There's a lot of truth that UW did a lot to not help itself in winning the game ...
Cal also did some really stupid shit as well to help keep us in the game ...
And while not excusing Petersen or Smith with this comment, but you get a lot of ups and downs with freshman ... UCLA is another great example. The highs will show you glimpses of what will come and the downs will leave you shaking your head. -
Twerked.godawgst said:
Do you really think with Peterman and Co. this is a 8-9 win team?RoadDawg55 said:
This is kind of true, but the offensive philosophy sucks and there is way too much cutesy bullshit going on. Right now, we should be an 8-9 win team, but Petersen is holding it back with his offense. So when the players improve we will win 8-9 when we should be winning 11+.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
-
I thought this thread was about teenage girls on the rag.
Pics?
