UW coaching search & AD search
His offense since being hired to coach mighty Washington has shown no willingness to acknowledge that his offense is totally broken.
His offense was a train wreck at Boise before leaving to head up mighty Warshington. The youth excuse is old & tired as it has been Mighty Warshington's company line for over a decade. Yes, the QB is young, yes the oline is young but Cal is not a good football team.
J Smith has proven over and over again that he just isn't the guy. The mass subbing, inexplicable individual subs and the willingness to rely on fly sweeps, pathetic bubble screens, and lindy's goal line package. He has no clue what he doing and looks as if he grasping for straws every Saturday.
Smith and Peterson can't put together an offense to beat a pathetic Cal defense. Ya, ya UW's defense played well but oh well they still lost.
Who cares if they were in position to win the game at end after what was a total dumpster fire of a offensive game. They can't finish.
UW will continue to duke it out with the basement dwellers AS a basement dweller until Pete chooses to address the turd of an offense. But there is no sign this will happen.
Grounds for firing. UW is a loser program, shouldn't be concerned with looking for another coach and worrying about cycling coaches.
Pete isn't the guy.
Pool boy needs to be fired today. Enough said on that.
Ya, ya it's all the same year after year. Should have just cut and pasted what everyone has been posting for a decade.
UW football unfortunately is a bigger downer that not getting a good night's sleep, a bigger downer than a night of drinking red hook, bigger downer than a handful of oxy downed with a handle of Bombay, a bigger downer than George Bush getting a second term, a bigger downer than Hillary being the next President. Basically, UW football ruins many lives and the light at the end of tunnel is dim.
Sorry Pete, I thought you were the hire we were hoping for but it's over. Move on.org
Comments
-
POTY.
-
I hate to break it to you, but Lindy's package scored a TD yesterday.
If your so smart, why don't you submit you're resume to be the OC, huh? -
This board has hit full meltdown mode.
-
It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year. -
This is kind of true, but the offensive philosophy sucks and there is way too much cutesy bullshit going on. Right now, we should be an 8-9 win team, but Petersen is holding it back with his offense. So when the players improve we will win 8-9 when we should be winning 11+.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year. -
A better offensive plan yesterday and these young players would have won the game. Sark left a mess but most of those loser players are gone or almost gone and the freshman and sophomores look pretty good but there's only so much they can do when they're not being put in position to succeed.
Fix the God dammed offensive scheme. -
TL:DR version
2022 will be speshul. -
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year. -
Gas. Match. Light. Peace.
-
that's what hurts me most about yesterday, that we were the reason we lost because of our own stubbornness and stupidity, not from Cal beating us.
-
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12. -
It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
-
A running game would be fine with those players.TTJ said:It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
Hope this helps. -
You should try dawgman.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
/plss -
McClucthin bub.ThomasFremont said:I hate to break it to you, but Lindy's package scored a TD yesterday.
If your so smart, why don't you submit you're resume to be the OC, huh? -
Why's that?Gladstone said:
You should try dawgman.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
/plss -
Because Doogs think continuity is important, Doog.Fecal_Matter said:
Why's that?Gladstone said:
You should try dawgman.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
/plss -
In fact it did until BabushkaFS decided it didn't.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A running game would be fine with those players.TTJ said:It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
Hope this helps. -
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
-
I'm not quite as down as some, but this is a perfectly good reason for being anti Petersen.DerekJohnson said:that's what hurts me most about yesterday, that we were the reason we lost because of our own stubbornness and stupidity, not from Cal beating us.
-
If it helps, I always want the coach fired.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Who the fuck has Peterman beaten while coaching UW anyway? -
Dawgman suppresses opposing viewpoints, this is the freedom forum, bitches!
-
Are you new here?Fecal_Matter said:
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times. -
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
-
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams. -
Game management has been subparDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
-
Utah StateDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
Sac State
Georgia State
Illinois
Hawaii
EWU
Cal
WSU
OSU
Colorado -
At bestNeGgaPlEaSe said:
Game management has been subparDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams. -
Zero teams with a winning record in FBS.Muttzen said:
Utah StateDerekJohnson said:
This is true. He's 10-8, and who has he beat?jecornel said:
So far Pete is a loser... a highly paid loser... mainly the praise for Pete has been recruiting which appears to be an upgrade from years past.Fecal_Matter said:
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
Though, Pete has been below average for the product on the field.
Praise has been limited even in wins because most of the wins have come against really shitty teams.
Sac State
Georgia State
Illinois
Hawaii
EWU
Cal
WSU
OSU
Colorado
But how is Peterman a mediocre coach? -
What has Petersen done since 2012? The wheels were falling off at Boise State in 2013, and so he jumped ship to UW in 2014.
His coaching staffs at Boise State were being plundered by schools with more money (Texas, Florida, ND), which shouldn't be as big a problem here but how the fuck did we end up with Montana's OC as our OC?
Hell, even Utah, which is known to have coordinator salary problems, has a better OC.
Is Petersen just unfamiliar with how to fire a coordinator, because all of his other ones were hired away?
