UW coaching search & AD search
Comments
-
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12. -
It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
-
A running game would be fine with those players.TTJ said:It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
Hope this helps. -
You should try dawgman.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
/plss -
McClucthin bub.ThomasFremont said:I hate to break it to you, but Lindy's package scored a TD yesterday.
If your so smart, why don't you submit you're resume to be the OC, huh? -
Why's that?Gladstone said:
You should try dawgman.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
/plss -
Because Doogs think continuity is important, Doog.Fecal_Matter said:
Why's that?Gladstone said:
You should try dawgman.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
/plss -
In fact it did until BabushkaFS decided it didn't.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
A running game would be fine with those players.TTJ said:It's hard to find anything to like in this scheme. But I do wonder what scheme would look good with a frosh QB and 3 frosh OL.
Hope this helps. -
Yeah, because Ty and Pete are exactly the same. I forgot they recruited the same talent, and had the same ability to develop it.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Continuity is the faggiest shit ever.Fecal_Matter said:
It's called continuity. Keep a coach who can develop players, while not running players off every year because he has new shiny toys.TTJ said:It's not Pete's fault his predecessors (and their apologists) trotted out "youth" as a recurring excuse. This team is undeniably young, and many of its problems relate directly to its youth.
If only there were a way to avoid being "young" every year.
It brought UW 0-12.
What's faggy are posters who want a new coach when we lose, while also want to anoint him when we win. Some of the posters here are more moody than a teenage girl on the rag. It's unbearable at times.
-
I'm not quite as down as some, but this is a perfectly good reason for being anti Petersen.DerekJohnson said:that's what hurts me most about yesterday, that we were the reason we lost because of our own stubbornness and stupidity, not from Cal beating us.
