I really loved
Comments
-
Boobs is right that Oregon hasn't done jack shit, but it doesn't make the mid field stop to save a 1 point home win over BYU any more impressive.
The conference is complete shit this year. I still think Oregon wins the North because Stanford still doesn't have a power running game, Cal is still ranked too high, UW doesn't yet have the offense they need to keep up with Oregon, Oregon St. is Oregon St., and the Cuogs should be in the Big Sky.
In South: ASU plays well until they have to and don't, Arizona has never won the Pac 12 so why count on them now?, USC has Sark, Utah isn't consistent enough offensively to win the south, and Colorado should join the Cuogs in the Big Sky. That leaves UCLA.
If you guys want to pick UCLA to win it, fine. I won't argue that, but UCLA is still an extremely flawed football team, and shouldn't be any where close to sniffing a top 15 ranking, neither should Oregon or any other Pac 12 team. The conference has SEC quarterbacks with shit for defenses sans Stanford.
-
*swoon*greenblood said:Boobs is right that Oregon hasn't done jack shit, but it doesn't make the mid field stop to save a 1 point home win over BYU any more impressive.
The conference is complete shit this year. I still think Oregon wins the North because Stanford still doesn't have a power running game, Cal is still ranked too high, UW doesn't yet have the offense they need to keep up with Oregon, Oregon St. is Oregon St., and the Cuogs should be in the Big Sky.
In South: ASU plays well until they have to and don't, Arizona has never won the Pac 12 so why count on them now?, USC has Sark, Utah isn't consistent enough offensively to win the south, and Colorado should join the Cuogs in the Big Sky. That leaves UCLA.
If you guys want to pick UCLA to win it, fine. I won't argue that, but UCLA is still an extremely flawed football team, and shouldn't be any where close to sniffing a top 15 ranking, neither should Oregon or any other Pac 12 team. The conference has SEC quarterbacks with shit for defenses sans Stanford. -
Which is why it is presumptuous to assume oregon wins the north, maybe even moreso than it was in 2012 and 2013.greenblood said:Boobs is right that Oregon hasn't done jack shit, but it doesn't make the mid field stop to save a 1 point home win over BYU any more impressive.
The conference is complete shit this year. I still think Oregon wins the North because Stanford still doesn't have a power running game, Cal is still ranked too high, UW doesn't yet have the offense they need to keep up with Oregon, Oregon St. is Oregon St., and the Cuogs should be in the Big Sky.
In South: ASU plays well until they have to and don't, Arizona has never won the Pac 12 so why count on them now?, USC has Sark, Utah isn't consistent enough offensively to win the south, and Colorado should join the Cuogs in the Big Sky. That leaves UCLA.
If you guys want to pick UCLA to win it, fine. I won't argue that, but UCLA is still an extremely flawed football team, and shouldn't be any where close to sniffing a top 15 ranking, neither should Oregon or any other Pac 12 team. The conference has SEC quarterbacks with shit for defenses sans Stanford. -
When anyone talks about UCLA down here which isn't much because Cal gets all the run, the new line is, Rosen played like shit but he didn't give up!!!!!1111. He made the play when he had to.
Arizona wins this week rather easily -
They very easily could.RaceBannon said:When anyone talks about UCLA down here which isn't much because Cal gets all the run, the new line is, Rosen played like shit but he didn't give up!!!!!1111. He made the play when he had to.
Arizona wins this week rather easily
How difficult must it be being a wildcat fan? In the hunt every other year or so, but always wetting the bed when it matters most. It's amazing how close this team has gotten on numerous occasions but still never able to win the conference. Even the cuogs have achieved that feat.
Mosster47?
