No greater indictment of Sark than ex-players mocking him
Michael Hartvigson
I'm sure there are more.
Instead of rallying to defend their coach, Sark's former players are pouring gasoline on the blaze.
Players not improving ... Same dumb-ass mistakes game after game ... In-state recruiting had gone to shit.
I was glad Sark moved on to USC (especially when we lucked into Chris Peterson), but I had no idea of his thorough incompetence.
Derek, you were spot on when you wrote that post on the Oregon site (or wherever it was) calling for Sark to be fired midway through his third year. Won't doubt you again my man.
Comments
-
-
Wrote what poast?
-
What did Danny say?BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Danny Shelton
Michael Hartvigson
I'm sure there are more.
Instead of rallying to defend their coach, Sark's former players are pouring gasoline on the blaze.
Players not improving ... Same dumb-ass mistakes game after game ... In-state recruiting had gone to shit.
I was glad Sark moved on to USC (especially when we lucked into Chris Peterson), but I had no idea of his thorough incompetence.
Derek, you were spot on when you wrote that post on the Oregon site (or wherever it was) calling for Sark to be fired midway through his third year. Won't doubt you again my man.
-
nmbednc said:
What did Danny say?BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Danny Shelton
Michael Hartvigson
I'm sure there are more.
Instead of rallying to defend their coach, Sark's former players are pouring gasoline on the blaze.
Players not improving ... Same dumb-ass mistakes game after game ... In-state recruiting had gone to shit.
I was glad Sark moved on to USC (especially when we lucked into Chris Peterson), but I had no idea of his thorough incompetence.
Derek, you were spot on when you wrote that post on the Oregon site (or wherever it was) calling for Sark to be fired midway through his third year. Won't doubt you again my man.
-
#respect
-
Actually, I first started saying it in October 2010 on DMc, to much derision. That's when Kim came up with the "Derek lost a lot of credibility around here when he started criticizing Sark." Which at the time felt like a dagger into the back, because I still considered Kim a friend, even though tensions had been slowly brewing. And here he was selling me down the river.BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Danny Shelton
Michael Hartvigson
I'm sure there are more.
Instead of rallying to defend their coach, Sark's former players are pouring gasoline on the blaze.
Players not improving ... Same dumb-ass mistakes game after game ... In-state recruiting had gone to shit.
I was glad Sark moved on to USC (especially when we lucked into Chris Peterson), but I had no idea of his thorough incompetence.
Derek, you were spot on when you wrote that post on the Oregon site (or wherever it was) calling for Sark to be fired midway through his third year. Won't doubt you again my man. -
You weren't respecting the bizness ...
What caused the tension? Your failure to wear Members Only jackets? -
DJ, I said no racist crapDerekJohnson said:
Actually, I first started saying it in October 2010 on DMc, to much derision. That's when Kim came up with the "Derek lost a lot of credibility around here when he started criticizing Sark." Which at the time felt like a dagger into the back, because I still considered Kim a friend, even though tensions had been slowly brewing. And here he was selling me down the river.BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Danny Shelton
Michael Hartvigson
I'm sure there are more.
Instead of rallying to defend their coach, Sark's former players are pouring gasoline on the blaze.
Players not improving ... Same dumb-ass mistakes game after game ... In-state recruiting had gone to shit.
I was glad Sark moved on to USC (especially when we lucked into Chris Peterson), but I had no idea of his thorough incompetence.
Derek, you were spot on when you wrote that post on the Oregon site (or wherever it was) calling for Sark to be fired midway through his third year. Won't doubt you again my man. -
It started with refusing to run certain articles that were critical of the athletic department. Then Kim got angry (privately) over criticism I had made about Emmert. Then Kim started getting offended and defensive by my anti-Sark comments.Tequilla said:You weren't respecting the bizness ...
What caused the tension? Your failure to wear Members Only jackets? -
To summarize:DerekJohnson said:
It started with refusing to run certain articles that were critical of the athletic department. Then Kim got angry (privately) over criticism I had made about Emmert. Then Kim started getting offended and defensive by my anti-Sark comments.Tequilla said:You weren't respecting the bizness ...
What caused the tension? Your failure to wear Members Only jackets?
You were threatening their access (which KJV professes to not care about ... we all know the truth there) x3 ...
Clear violation of respecting the bizness ...
I think you should offer a truce package this holiday season consisting of a share of stock in both Chiquita Brands and Starbucks.





