Washington Poised For Downturn Under Petersen
Comments
-
Roadie of course everything is speculation. I'm forming a long-term outlook based on UW's ability to recruit in the top 25, what he's done with recruiting so far, his background and track record at Boise, etc. Never did I say it was a foregone conclusion. I'm laying out what we should realistically expect for the next few years and for the next 10. Since the end of last year I've been saying that either year 3 or year 4 should be the inflection point for an acceleration in progress.
-
Or it's just AuburnDoog style happy horseshit—WITH MAFF!!!HeretoBeatmyChest said:Roadie of course everything is speculation. I'm forming a long-term outlook based on UW's ability to recruit in the top 25, what he's done with recruiting so far, his background and track record at Boise, etc. Never did I say it was a foregone conclusion. I'm laying out what we should realistically expect for the next few years and for the next 10. Since the end of last year I've been saying that either year 3 or year 4 should be the inflection point for an acceleration in progress.
-
Boise St in the 7 years prior to Pete was #34. They were #11 in his eight years.
-
@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it. -
We played well against Illinois and Cal early in the year. Cal on the road was probably the best game of the season. I don't buy that the team improved so much late in the year. They were average. Some weeks they played reasonably well, other weeks not so much. That's what average teams do.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" has some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years. That's a trend. -
You're just bitter because Miley turned out to be a bag of shit and you thought he was great. So, you're overly cynical because you—even during games—thought we were getting decent-to-good QB play. And so you attribute a lot of us being horrible on offense to Pete, when it was really just that Miley was fucking awful and we couldn't do shit with him in games.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well against Illinois and Cal early in the year. Cal on the road was probably the best game of the season. I don't buy that the team improved so much late in the year. They were average. Some weeks they played reasonably well, other weeks not so much. That's what average teams do.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" might have some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years.
I agree that things should get better with time, but still. There are plenty of things to be concerned about.
If you ever want to make yourself feel like a fuck wad, you should definitely go back in to game threads from last year and read your Miley dooging. It was unstoppable.
I read through one of them a couple months ago for some laughs, because obviously I was being an insane idiot, and your Miley dooging gave me a few uncontrollable cringes.
Anyway, none of that matters. But, I do think it explains your cynicism when it comes to pete and how we performed last season. -
-
I've admitted many times that Miley sucked and I was wrong, but okay. I'm still waiting for Lavon Coleman to prove he shouldn't be playing at Montana. I'm not bitter about anything. We played worse when the other QB's got their chance. Miley and the QB's were a large part of the problem. 3 years of bad offense is three years Denny. We've had these threads many times already so there isn't a need to hash it out again.Dennis_DeYoung said:
You're just bitter because Miley turned out to be a bag of shit and you thought he was great. So, you're overly cynical because you—even during games—thought we were getting decent-to-good QB play.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well against Illinois and Cal early in the year. Cal on the road was probably the best game of the season. I don't buy that the team improved so much late in the year. They were average. Some weeks they played reasonably well, other weeks not so much. That's what average teams do.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" might have some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years.
I agree that things should get better with time, but still. There are plenty of things to be concerned about.
If you ever want to make yourself feel like a fuck wad, you should definitely go back in to game threads from last year and read your Miley dooging. It was unstoppable.
I read through one of them a couple months ago for some laps, because obviously I was being an insane idiot, and your Miley dooging gave me a few uncontrollable cringes.
Anyway, none of that matters. But, I do think it explains your cynicism when it comes to people and how we performed last season. -
Coleman win the Heisman you asshole!!
-
Miles was less of a problem than Smith
-
FTFYDennis_DeYoung said:ColemanBBK win the Heisman you asshole!! -
In honor of rereading last year's game threads, here is the Zona recap.Dennis_DeYoung said:
You're just bitter because Miley turned out to be a bag of shit and you thought he was great. So, you're overly cynical because you—even during games—thought we were getting decent-to-good QB play. And so you attribute a lot of us being horrible on offense to Pete, when it was really just that Miley was fucking awful and we couldn't do shit with him in games.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well against Illinois and Cal early in the year. Cal on the road was probably the best game of the season. I don't buy that the team improved so much late in the year. They were average. Some weeks they played reasonably well, other weeks not so much. That's what average teams do.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" might have some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years.
I agree that things should get better with time, but still. There are plenty of things to be concerned about.
If you ever want to make yourself feel like a fuck wad, you should definitely go back in to game threads from last year and read your Miley dooging. It was unstoppable.
I read through one of them a couple months ago for some laughs, because obviously I was being an insane idiot, and your Miley dooging gave me a few uncontrollable cringes.
Anyway, none of that matters. But, I do think it explains your cynicism when it comes to pete and how we performed last season.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/15261/doogles-hardcore-game-thread-recap -
Dennis_DeYoung after botched snap on extra point: Kill everyone.
-
I don't think 3 years is a trend, at least not with 2 different programs, two different rosters, and 3 different starting QBs:
2012: Joe Southwick
2013: Grant Hendrick
2014: Cyler Miles (also starts by Lindquist and Troy Williams).
I wonder how Petersen would've done in 2014 at BSU with Hendrick returning at QB, Jay Ajayi returning at RB, and his top 2 WRs returning as well...I have to imagine the BSU's offense would've improved under CP in 2014 like it did under Bryan Harsin.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well against Illinois and Cal early in the year. Cal on the road was probably the best game of the season. I don't buy that the team improved so much late in the year. They were average. Some weeks they played reasonably well, other weeks not so much. That's what average teams do.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" has some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years. That's a trend. -
I didn't see this mentioned here - but Pete had some interesting quotes to this effect on the ESPNU championship drive pod with Maisel.RoadDawg55 said:
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" has some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years. That's a trend.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
Ivan asked him if he maybe tried to install too much last year. Peterson (if I recall correctly) said it wasn't quite that, but more that he underestimated how hard it was to change a culture and said he should have asked for input or focus from other coaches on how to do that. He said he underestimated what made Boise special and how hard it was to build that at another school.
I thought it was some interesting quotes from a guy that is notoriously tight-lipped.
-
I laffed. And bumped that old beauty.Doogles said:
In honor of rereading last year's game threads, here is the Zona recap.Dennis_DeYoung said:
You're just bitter because Miley turned out to be a bag of shit and you thought he was great. So, you're overly cynical because you—even during games—thought we were getting decent-to-good QB play. And so you attribute a lot of us being horrible on offense to Pete, when it was really just that Miley was fucking awful and we couldn't do shit with him in games.RoadDawg55 said:
We played well against Illinois and Cal early in the year. Cal on the road was probably the best game of the season. I don't buy that the team improved so much late in the year. They were average. Some weeks they played reasonably well, other weeks not so much. That's what average teams do.Dennis_DeYoung said:@HeretoBeatmyChest said it best. Pete is good. Give him some fucking time.
Taking last year—a year where he obviously ripped everything down to the studs—as being 'concerning' is a little weird. I hate Babushka as much as the next guy, but let's see what happens this and next year when they get their guys in.
These are a lot of cliches, but in this case I fear they are true because Pete actually does have a system, his kind of guys, etc. Sark had none of that shit. Sark just took over the roster and said F it. So did Neu. I don't even know what Gilby did.
This season will be a lot more diagnostic. Although @RoadDawg55 likes to point to the UCLA game as being the basis of all his fears, that game was really a 'wrong place, wrong time' for everything that was going on last year.
It's instructive to me that we played way, way better as the season went on. You can say that's because we got shitty opponents, but that's not really the case. We played like shit against everyone early and by the end of the year, we blew the doors off 2 mediocre/bad teams (OSU and WSU). If we'd played Hawai'i again at the end of the season, we'd have destroyed them.
I think Pete's record gives him the privilege of a 'half-full glass' look. If you look at last year as a half full glass, the read is pretty simple:
He told everyone to suck it and do it his way. He dicked around a lot to just see what people would do, could do, were willing to do.
By the end of the year, we were really not very bad as he got people to play more 'his way', started using the 'talent' better and minimizing the impact of Miley on shit.
The Okie State game was just another Sark-era setback where people backslid with mental intensity. We actually played well in the second half, but it was too late.
This is why people picking us to be shit because we lost players is sort of missing the point. Shaq did make big plays, true; but when we 'got good' Shaq was almost irrelevant. MP was clearly irrelevant, it was really just Danny (who was totally inconsistent before last year) and Hau'oli who had only been good against crap teams.
I should just erase this poast as it's Teqfuckinglong, but I'm hung over so I'm typing. Fuck it.
And more power to you for keeping the optimism in the face of last season's results. I get that it's only one season, but The assessment that Pete came in and said, "Fuck it, we are doing this my way" might have some merit, but his offenses have been shit for three years.
I agree that things should get better with time, but still. There are plenty of things to be concerned about.
If you ever want to make yourself feel like a fuck wad, you should definitely go back in to game threads from last year and read your Miley dooging. It was unstoppable.
I read through one of them a couple months ago for some laughs, because obviously I was being an insane idiot, and your Miley dooging gave me a few uncontrollable cringes.
Anyway, none of that matters. But, I do think it explains your cynicism when it comes to pete and how we performed last season.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/15261/doogles-hardcore-game-thread-recap -
To be
Smith's playcalling was vanilla as shit but when your quarterback can't even throw the ball 10 yards downfield accurately, that's a way bigger issue than the person calling playsPostGameOrangeSlices said:Miles was less of a problem than Smith
-
I've admitted many times that Miley sucked and I was wrong, but okay. I'm still waiting for Lavon Coleman to prove he shouldn't be playing at Montana. I'm not bitter about anything. We played worse when the other QB's got their chance. Miley and the QB's were a large part of the problem. 3 years of bad offense is three years Denny. We've had these threads many times already so there isn't a need to hash it out again.
I'm sick and tired of your lying bullshit Roadie. BSU had a fucking top 25 offense in 2013. 22nd in yds per game (476) and 20th in pts per game (37.5). Pete had ONE average year at BSU in 2012 when he was replacing the most productive QB in the history of college football. BSU also happened to go 11-2 that year including the Vegas Bowl victory over UW. So who fucking cares about offensive stats when your team goes 11-2?
Like someone else pointed out in this thread, the two years CP has had an average offense ('12 &'14) he's had shitty QB play. There's not a coach in the country that can produce a top 25 offense without a decent QB. Miley can't throw a football farther than 10 yards. How the fuck do you run an offense with that? The play calling last year lacked creativity because we were held back by shitty QB play. A lot of what CP does on offense is allow the QB to call plays and make changes at the LOS. Kellen Moore was a master at doing this. At the LOS he was able to see the mismatches in personnel and call the correct play to exploit the mismatch. Do you think Miley could do this? Fuck no!
You need the right QB to run Petes offense. Sark left Pete a bunch of fucktards. That's why Pete went out of his way and had been recruiting Browning since he was a freshman. I have confidence that once Browning takes over at QB the offense is going to be just as explosive as it was at BSU. He's going to struggle at first and take his lumps but when he gains the experience and confidence he's going to be great. I expect growing pains this year but we'll all see glimpses of what's to come. Expect 5 or 6 wins this year if Browning starts. Next year 9 or 10 wins.
#StraightUpDoogin
-
Didn't he also win a Fiesta Bowl against Oklahoma back when they were Oklahoma, before he had said quarterback?CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:I like to say that a coach was only good because of his QB during a historic run of success that many other programs couldn't match.
I like to ignore that the coach still does a lot of other shit like: recruit the QB, Hire the coaches, Instill the culture, develop a nasty defense, recruit other players besides QB, etc.
If the QB was the only thing that mattered in football, Cal would be the favorite in the conference this year.
Petersen may suck here, but anyone can suck anywhere, it doesn't discredit what he did at Boise. -
I've admitted many times that Miley sucked and I was wrong, but okay. I'm still waiting for Lavon Coleman to prove he shouldn't be playing at Montana. I'm not bitter about anything. We played worse when the other QB's got their chance. Miley and the QB's were a large part of the problem. 3 years of bad offense is three years Denny. We've had these threads many times already so there isn't a need to hash it out again.purpledoogfan said:
I'm sick and tired of your lying bullshit Roadie. BSU had a fucking top 25 offense in 2013. 22nd in yds per game (476) and 20th in pts per game (37.5). Pete had ONE average year at BSU in 2012 when he was replacing the most productive QB in the history of college football. BSU also happened to go 11-2 that year including the Vegas Bowl victory over UW. So who fucking cares about offensive stats when your team goes 11-2?
Like someone else pointed out in this thread, the two years CP has had an average offense ('12 &'14) he's had shitty QB play. There's not a coach in the country that can produce a top 25 offense without a decent QB. Miley can't throw a football farther than 10 yards. How the fuck do you run an offense with that? The play calling last year lacked creativity because we were held back by shitty QB play. A lot of what CP does on offense is allow the QB to call plays and make changes at the LOS. Kellen Moore was a master at doing this. At the LOS he was able to see the mismatches in personnel and call the correct play to exploit the mismatch. Do you think Miley could do this? Fuck no!
You need the right QB to run Petes offense. Sark left Pete a bunch of fucktards. That's why Pete went out of his way and had been recruiting Browning since he was a freshman. I have confidence that once Browning takes over at QB the offense is going to be just as explosive as it was at BSU. He's going to struggle at first and take his lumps but when he gains the experience and confidence he's going to be great. I expect growing pains this year but we'll all see glimpses of what's to come. Expect 5 or 6 wins this year if Browning starts. Next year 9 or 10 wins.
#StraightUpDoogin
I don't disagree with a lot of your post, but relying on Miley to do shit he couldn't do was FS. What makes some coaches great is the ability to maximize the talent at hand and fit their schemes to the talent. We had shitty talent, no question. The coaching was shit too. Jmo based on the results.
Kellen Moore was an exceptional QB. Can Pete field a good offense without a Moore? There are issues on the offensive side of the ball. You are a fucking idiot if you believe otherwise.
You hope Browning will be good. I do too. Realistically, he won't be as good as Kellen Moore though.
This is a message board. We talk the good, bad, and ugly. And right now our offense is a 300 pound whale with blisters and warts on her pussy. Forgive me for not having blind faith that the offense will roll after we finished dead fucking last in the PAC 12 last year.
And Boise State scored 6 points at Husky Stadium. With multiple NFL players. That offense sucked. -
I'm sick and tired of your lying bullshit Roadie. BSU had a fucking top 25 offense in 2013. 22nd in yds per game (476) and 20th in pts per game (37.5). Pete had ONE average year at BSU in 2012 when he was replacing the most productive QB in the history of college football. BSU also happened to go 11-2 that year including the Vegas Bowl victory over UW. So who fucking cares about offensive stats when your team goes 11-2?RoadDawg55 said:
I've admitted many times that Miley sucked and I was wrong, but okay. I'm still waiting for Lavon Coleman to prove he shouldn't be playing at Montana. I'm not bitter about anything. We played worse when the other QB's got their chance. Miley and the QB's were a large part of the problem. 3 years of bad offense is three years Denny. We've had these threads many times already so there isn't a need to hash it out again.purpledoogfan said:
Like someone else pointed out in this thread, the two years CP has had an average offense ('12 &'14) he's had shitty QB play. There's not a coach in the country that can produce a top 25 offense without a decent QB. Miley can't throw a football farther than 10 yards. How the fuck do you run an offense with that? The play calling last year lacked creativity because we were held back by shitty QB play. A lot of what CP does on offense is allow the QB to call plays and make changes at the LOS. Kellen Moore was a master at doing this. At the LOS he was able to see the mismatches in personnel and call the correct play to exploit the mismatch. Do you think Miley could do this? Fuck no!
You need the right QB to run Petes offense. Sark left Pete a bunch of fucktards. That's why Pete went out of his way and had been recruiting Browning since he was a freshman. I have confidence that once Browning takes over at QB the offense is going to be just as explosive as it was at BSU. He's going to struggle at first and take his lumps but when he gains the experience and confidence he's going to be great. I expect growing pains this year but we'll all see glimpses of what's to come. Expect 5 or 6 wins this year if Browning starts. Next year 9 or 10 wins.
#StraightUpDoogin
I don't disagree with a lot of your post, but relying on Miley to do shit he couldn't do was FS. What makes some coaches great is the ability to maximize the talent at hand and fit their schemes to the talent. We had shitty talent, no question. The coaching was shit too. Jmo based on the results.
Kellen Moore was an exceptional QB. Can Pete field a good offense without a Moore? There are issues on the offensive side of the ball. You are a fucking idiot if you believe otherwise.
You hope Browning will be good. I do too. Realistically, he won't be as good as Kellen Moore though.
This is a message board. We talk the good, bad, and ugly. And right now our offense is a 300 pound whale with blisters and warts on her pussy. Forgive me for not having blind faith that the offense will roll after we finished dead fucking last in the PAC 12 last year.
And Boise State scored 6 points at Husky Stadium. With multiple NFL players. That offense sucked.
Please tell me what they could have done last year to maximize the talent?
Option 1: Miley -couldn't throw the ball past 10 yards. On top of that we now find out he had an injured hip which considerably effected his ability to be a running threat. 10 cent head and couldn't hold on to the fucking ball.
Option 2: Swede- DIAFF if you thought he was the better option last year.
Option 3: Black Power- Started one game in a monsoon and looked like shit. He was too turnover prone for Petes liking. Never bought in to the coaching change. Legendary 4-star Sark recruit.
Its not blind faith to think the offense is going to turn around. Petes strategy was obvious last year. Don't turn the ball over on offense and let your defense win the game. The strategy almost worked. We were a couple plays per game (Stan, UA, OSU) away from 11 wins. Better talent at QB would have made a major difference.
-
This thread has been brought to you by Tequilla
-
That UW defense Boise went up against in 2013 had numerous NFL players.....Shelton, Kikaha, Shaq, Peters, Ducre and Parker who was close plus Feeney potentially.
After looking at the numbers, I conclude that 81% of the reason the offense sucked was Miles.
-Miles had 13 total fumbles- the most in the entire country
-Miles was 11/12 in QBR in pac12....12th/13 if you include Luke Falk.
-His QBR was 49. The #10 QB Anu Solomon's QBR was 58.5, nearly 10 points above Miles.
-Miles QBR was worse than Goff & Sefo during their true freshman seasons.
Here are some of UW's offensive stats:
-5th in yards per carry
-4th in rushing yards
-8th in long scrimmage plays (I averaged out the data)
-3rd in sacks allowed
-5th in TFL allowed
-10th in yards per play
-11th in yards per game
The sacks and TFL #s may be a bit inflated due to passing less than other teams but I bet both would be top 9. Most of the non-Cyler influenced numbers are okay while Cyler was god awful. Not only was he 11th in the conference but he was miles (pun intended) away from #10 Solomon.
This does not absolve Petersen and J Smith from blame but it gives us proper context. -
If you can't use the Quote button effectively, your argument is invalid.
-
Malzahn and Chip Kelly had great offenses with shit QB's. Wisconsin runs it down the throat of the other team with mostly bad QB play.
The offense sucked last year. Fuck your excuses. It needs to be better. -
Are you fucking kidding me? Is this is whoosh?RoadDawg55 said:Malzahn and Chip Kelly had great offenses with shit QB's. Wisconsin runs it down the throat of the other team with mostly bad QB play.
The offense sucked last year. Fuck your excuses. It needs to be better.
Auburn and Oregon can get away with below average QB play because their offense is LOADED with elite talent. Their players have also been playing in the same offensive system for years. Fuck you for even comparing our shitty offensive players to Auburn and Oregon.
Wisconsin can run it down other teams throats because they recruit talented feces in their throats OL. Again, fuck you for comparing UW's shitty OL to Wisconsin.
Here's the truth about what CP and Smith had to work with. The most explosive playmaker (Ross) had to be moved to defense. Our All-American LB had to start 3 games at RB. The starting QB was hurt and couldn't throw past 10 yards. Jaydon Mickens is the best player UW has on offense.
Show me one coach in America who can turn that shit sandwich into filet mignon.
-
They weren't really comparisons. You are recycling every doog cliche on why we have sucked. Always blame the players.purpledoogfan said:
Are you fucking kidding me? Is this is whoosh?RoadDawg55 said:Malzahn and Chip Kelly had great offenses with shit QB's. Wisconsin runs it down the throat of the other team with mostly bad QB play.
The offense sucked last year. Fuck your excuses. It needs to be better.
Auburn and Oregon can get away with below average QB play because their offense is LOADED with elite talent. Their players have also been playing in the same offensive system for years. Fuck you for even comparing our shitty offensive players to Auburn and Oregon.
Wisconsin can run it down other teams throats because they recruit talented feces in their throats OL. Again, fuck you for comparing UW's shitty OL to Wisconsin.
Here's the truth about what CP and Smith had to work with. The most explosive playmaker (Ross) had to be moved to defense. Our All-American LB had to start 3 games at RB. The starting QB was hurt and couldn't throw past 10 yards. Jaydon Mickens is the best player UW has on offense.
Show me one coach in America who can turn that shit sandwich into filet mignon.
12th is 12th. Bad talent and bad coaching = shit results. It wasn't all Miles fault. It wasn't all Smith/Petersen's. It was a fucking mess. In what year is it okay to place some blame on the coaches? Whatever you want to believe though. -
this thread, it is delivering
-
Pm to @AZDuck
UW's defense was 16th best according to football outsiders.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/feidef -
Early Oregon teams weren't that loaded. What's Barner or LaMichael James doing these days? Their best WR back then was a white walk-on if i recall correctly.purpledoogfan said:
Are you fucking kidding me? Is this is whoosh?RoadDawg55 said:Malzahn and Chip Kelly had great offenses with shit QB's. Wisconsin runs it down the throat of the other team with mostly bad QB play.
The offense sucked last year. Fuck your excuses. It needs to be better.
Auburn and Oregon can get away with below average QB play because their offense is LOADED with elite talent. Their players have also been playing in the same offensive system for years. Fuck you for even comparing our shitty offensive players to Auburn and Oregon.
Wisconsin can run it down other teams throats because they recruit talented feces in their throats OL. Again, fuck you for comparing UW's shitty OL to Wisconsin.
Here's the truth about what CP and Smith had to work with. The most explosive playmaker (Ross) had to be moved to defense. Our All-American LB had to start 3 games at RB. The starting QB was hurt and couldn't throw past 10 yards. Jaydon Mickens is the best player UW has on offense.
Show me one coach in America who can turn that shit sandwich into filet mignon.
They did have shit QBs, but they had a system that got the most out of what they had. Later they got great talent in a great system.