Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

David Long (2016 4* CB, Loyola CA)

245

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
    I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • whatshouldicareabout
    whatshouldicareabout Member Posts: 13,014
    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
    I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b-i0XknSnM
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:

    Dennis_DeYoung said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Just watched his Hudl. Definitely a great looking prospect.

    I was watching a receiver last year, I can't remember who it was – – it could've been one of ours – – and they were playing Loyola. David Long absolutely jumped off the film… I was like, who is that?

    He's a Baller, too bad he's going to Stanford.
    I hate Stanford.

    Apparently we are doing well with Byron Murphy for now, but unfortuantely he has grade issues. And I am sure if he gets his grades in order he will go to A&M or something anways.
    I think we can McClatcher Murphy.

    I think A&M will have sexier people who are more likely to qualify… And my guess is we'll get him qualified.
    If we can get him I'd be ecstatic.

    Still upset that Rapp is a 3 star, it's hogwash.
    I'm not saying we will get him, don't twist. I'm just saying—with the current variables—my crystal ball is 81% locked in for Murphy to Washington.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9b-i0XknSnM
    God damn right!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,581
    From what I saw elsewhere, Long tweeted he would be announcing and mentioned USC, Stanford, and UCLA in the tweet. Lars then asked him about UW and he said they are still in it. If he was picking UW, I don't think he would have forgotten to mention them in his tweet.

    Ektard has been saying lately that UW is where Long wants to go but Stanford's education may pull him that way.

    I don't see Murphy coming to UW but you never know. My guess is we get either Bryant or Gilchrist
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter
    I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,512
    Yep:

    Long > Stanford

    Murphy > Texas Agriculture & Mining University

    Love = DAWGS

    Gilchrist = DAWGS

    Myles Bryant > Powder Blue with cursive on their helemts
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I would be more than fine with Gilchrist and Love. Both are solid prospects and they should be able to redshirt as long as the CB's on the roster don't transfer.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    Insider info says we are looking good for Murph.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter