TE Devin Asiasi

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

IDGAF about Asiasi. He's fine, but whatever. His teammate Tagaloa? Holy F that guy is good.

Bruin.

I know... the consolation for me is that everyone who goes to UCLA ends up being inconsistent and soft. So, there's that.

The one thing they have been consistent at is beating UW. Even Terry Donahue had a winning record vs Don James. Lulz.

It doesn't strike you as funny, though, that every year during that period UCLA was hauling in top-10 recruiting classes and we couldn't get half your players to visit here and he was 1 game over .500 (I believe) during that time?

I mean... that's my point. You guys always get Boss Tagaloa's and turn it into teams that are only slightly better than teams that get mid-tier guys.

It's like saying 'yeah, but we are 50/50 with WSU!!!' - uh, yeah, we should beat them every year and when we don't it's a colossal failure.

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

IDGAF about Asiasi. He's fine, but whatever. His teammate Tagaloa? Holy F that guy is good.

Bruin.

I know... the consolation for me is that everyone who goes to UCLA ends up being inconsistent and soft. So, there's that.

The one thing they have been consistent at is beating UW. Even Terry Donahue had a winning record vs Don James. Lulz.

It doesn't strike you as funny, though, that every year during that period UCLA was hauling in top-10 recruiting classes and we couldn't get half your players to visit here and he was 1 game over .500 (I believe) during that time?

I mean... that's my point. You guys always get Boss Tagaloa's and turn it into teams that are only slightly better than teams that get mid-tier guys.

It's like saying 'yeah, but we are 50/50 with WSU!!!' - uh, yeah, we should beat them every year and when we don't it's a colossal failure.

You made me look it up: 7-4-1 against Don James.

You're just mad it's not 1991 anymore, and you're mad that you're fat. So it's a coping mechanism. I get it. Most of your narratives about the sport are clearly stuck in 80s. Underachieving (Donahue) or overachieving (Don James) is indicative of the coach, not the program. It actually gives me hope about the programs potential, Donahue & Tolardo made 5 rosebowls. An even slightly above average coach is capable of more in my opinion.

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

IDGAF about Asiasi. He's fine, but whatever. His teammate Tagaloa? Holy F that guy is good.

Bruin.

I know... the consolation for me is that everyone who goes to UCLA ends up being inconsistent and soft. So, there's that.

The one thing they have been consistent at is beating UW. Even Terry Donahue had a winning record vs Don James. Lulz.

It doesn't strike you as funny, though, that every year during that period UCLA was hauling in top-10 recruiting classes and we couldn't get half your players to visit here and he was 1 game over .500 (I believe) during that time?

I mean... that's my point. You guys always get Boss Tagaloa's and turn it into teams that are only slightly better than teams that get mid-tier guys.

It's like saying 'yeah, but we are 50/50 with WSU!!!' - uh, yeah, we should beat them every year and when we don't it's a colossal failure.

You made me look it up: 7-4-1 against Don James.

You're just mad it's not 1991 anymore, and you're mad that you're fat. So it's a coping mechanism. I get it. Most of your narratives about the sport are clearly stuck in 80s. Underachieving (Donahue) or overachieving (Don James) is indicative of the coach, not the program. It actually gives me hope about the programs potential, Donahue & Tolardo made 5 rosebowls. An even slightly above average coach is capable of more in my opinion.

Last Rose Bowl Season: UW 2000 UCLA 1998

Obviously UCLA didn't reach the depths of UW since then, but UCLA has been pretty damn bad since their last Rose Bowl. Both programs suck.

No doubt, but that's not the question. It's why they've sucked. Both programs have underachieved because they have made horrible coaching hires - Dorrell Gilby Ty Neu Sark. Fudge! (No swear bored).

They haven't sucked because the program is inherently predisposed to underacheive.

I guess you could say maybe both our schools administrations are predisposed to making bad decisions and being pussys which leads to underachieving. I could see the merit in that argument, but that's not DDYs argument.

Dennis_DeYoung said:

UCLA has 1 National Championship and has had a billion 25 star recruits and is in Beverly Hills.

Cal has 5 Nattys. Sleeping Giant quite honestly.

DennisDeYoungFS (f stands for fat).

And I don't think Terry Donahue was an underachiever. Every UCLA coach since him, no question. But Donahue was a damn good coach.

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

Probably because you're both poor. SC gets 100% of the sidewalk Messican alumni/fan.

RoadDawg55 said:

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

Probably because you're both poor. SC gets 100% of the sidewalk Messican alumni/fan.

What I lack in money, I'm rich in love. Lol at thinking rich people in LA give a shit about UCLA football. My main spot for the games was Busby's in Santa Monica. Sometimes I would go to Barney's in Burbank because a friend of mine lived nearby. Neither are located in poor areas. Both had very few Broon fans.

Maybe you just didn't notice them inbetween bussing tables? Broons are there.

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

Probably because you're both poor. SC gets 100% of the sidewalk Messican alumni/fan.

But, seemingly not untrue. When I googled 'UCLA Mexican fan' this is what came back:

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

Probably because you're both poor. SC gets 100% of the sidewalk Messican alumni/fan.

UCLA having a shitty fan base is pretty much a universal truth. At the rich, hip, douchy sports bar in the Marina @WilburHooksHands alerted me to there were tons of USC, UW, Oregon, and Cal douchebags. Even quite a few Domers and Michigan people were there. UCLA had zero presence.

If your argument is the reason nobody sees UCLA fans out (or in the rose bowl for that matter) is because they are too busy watching from their private yachts, light yourself on fire the next time you're with @thechatch

I've lived in SF for awhile too dingleberry, which is why I have to call you out on all your made up stories about the place. There are not tons of UW fans in San Francisco. Oregon and Cal - yes. SC & UCLA - not really. UW - very few. I'd say there are more Indiana fans in the marina bars than UW (or the two LA schools or Cal). We both know this.

You're out of your element. Shut it.

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

Probably because you're both poor. SC gets 100% of the sidewalk Messican alumni/fan.

UCLA having a shitty fan base is pretty much a universal truth. At the rich, hip, douchy sports bar in the Marina @WilburHooksHands alerted me to there were tons of USC, UW, Oregon, and Cal douchebags. Even quite a few Domers and Michigan people were there. UCLA had zero presence.

If your argument is the reason nobody sees UCLA fans out (or in the rose bowl for that matter) is because they are too busy watching from their private yachts, light yourself on fire the next time you're with @thechatch

I've lived in SF for awhile too dingleberry, which is why I have to call you out on all your made up stories about the place. There are not tons of UW fans in San Francisco. Oregon and Cal - yes. SC & UCLA - not really. UW - few. I'd say there are more Indiana fans in the marina bars than UW (or the two LA schools or Cal). We both know this.

You're out of your element. Shut it.

The bar in question was the official Husky Bar, it was loaded ballbag. And SC pretty much owns the Marina so I don't know what you're talking about.

I have a weird feeling that God is going to smite us for talking too much about UCLA sports. It's obvious no one anywhere gives a shit and we're only arguing because we're here with some unfortunate soul who is—as a product of circumstance—on the wrong side of things.

It feels like punching a Down's Syndrome kid in a wheel chair just being he's like, "I'm better at World of Warcraft than you and I fingered your mom!"

Let @BallSacked have it.

UCLA Broons rule! Garby Bieber forever!

Look at that dude! I'm sure there were no black athletes in '67 more deserving that Garby Bieban!! Not across town or in West Lafayatte! No Polish guys in Syracuse certainly!

Broowoof! The 8-to-7 TD/Int ratio just doesn't represent his contributions to that 7-2-1 Broons team!

I mean, just because they lost to Syracuse, USC and tied Oregon State it doesn't mean anything!


(Close your eyes @BallSacked - this was just a bad dream; definitely do not watch the part at 3:10 where Bieber gets munched by the Troje)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNUhKC7CCYU

BallSacked said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

Doogles said:

BallSacked said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Dennis_DeYoung said:

My point is UCLA has one frigging Natty. They should just win. We have our own problems. Is there some fucking iron law that says Oregon should be better than us? F no. We need to win, but Broons are useless.

Although I'm glad @BallSacked is here on balance. First of all, I think he's a pretty good poaster, second it reminds me that the Bruins do have fans. When I lived in LA, I don't think I saw any.

I don't see many either. I meet tons of Laker and Clippers fans. Tons of Dodger fans. I used to watch every Pac 12 Network game at a sports bar and no matter where I went, there were a good amount of USC fans, but hardly any Broon fans.

Probably because you're both poor. SC gets 100% of the sidewalk Messican alumni/fan.

UCLA having a shitty fan base is pretty much a universal truth. At the rich, hip, douchy sports bar in the Marina @WilburHooksHands alerted me to there were tons of USC, UW, Oregon, and Cal douchebags. Even quite a few Domers and Michigan people were there. UCLA had zero presence.

If your argument is the reason nobody sees UCLA fans out (or in the rose bowl for that matter) is because they are too busy watching from their private yachts, light yourself on fire the next time you're with @thechatch

I've lived in SF for awhile too dingleberry, which is why I have to call you out on all your made up stories about the place. There are not tons of UW fans in San Francisco. Oregon and Cal - yes. SC & UCLA - not really. UW - few. I'd say there are more Indiana fans in the marina bars than UW (or the two LA schools or Cal). We both know this.

You're out of your element. Shut it.

The bar in question was the official Husky Bar, it was loaded ballbag. And SC pretty much owns the Marina so I don't know what you're talking about.

I have a weird feeling that God is going to smite us for talking too much about UCLA sports. It's obvious no one anywhere gives a shit and we're only arguing because we're here with some unfortunate soul who is—as a product of circumstance—on the wrong side of things.

It feels like punching a Down's Syndrome kid in a wheel chair just being he's like, "I'm better at World of Warcraft than you and I fingered your mom!"

Let @BallSacked have it.

UCLA Broons rule! Garby Bieber forever!

Not classy bro. Doogles doesn't have Down syndrome. He's just really stupid.

You're a worthy adversary DDY. You've clearly been #built4life.

Damn skippy! Broowoof!

When I can escape familial commitments from my husband (and our other partner...fingers crossed SCOTUS approves poly amorous relationships... Go justice Kennedy fellow land park kid), I stumble to the Final Final. Seems to be more than a few UW fans there.