9 Black People Gunned Down at Bible Study, Obvious Hate Crime
Comments
-
The "militia" at the time the constitution was written wasn't what we think of as "militia" today. It was those (in addition to the army and navy) that the US government could call upon to serve at the whim of the government. Damned right the government's forces should be "well regulated" by an armed populace free to defend themselves.OZONE said:
And you don't have a protected right for anything beyond a well regulated militia.Blackie said:
You don't have a natural constitutionally protected right to drive.OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
-
Cars kill more people than guns in the US. HTH.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
And more would occur if people were required to do very minimal, or zero training to operate a carPurpleJ said:
Yet fatal car accidents still happen everyday...OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
C'mon, you're better than the dumbshit knee jerk response.
-
Holy shit. Does common sense need to be spoon fed to you? To compare them, you'd need to normalize for the amount of time each person uses each. Get it?PurpleJ said:
Cars kill more people than guns in the US. HTH.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
And more would occur if people were required to do very minimal, or zero training to operate a carPurpleJ said:
Yet fatal car accidents still happen everyday...OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
C'mon, you're better than the dumbshit knee jerk response. -
And that is the only group that is guaranteed a "right" to arms. The rest was just revisionist action by the gov't to please the gun manufacturers, their shills the NRA, and those that grew up beating off to John Wayne movies.Blackie said:
The "militia" at the time the constitution was written wasn't what we think of as "militia" today. It was those (in addition to the army and navy) that the US government could call upon to serve at the whim of the government. Damned right the government's forces should be "well regulated" by an armed populace free to defend themselves.OZONE said:
And you don't have a protected right for anything beyond a well regulated militia.Blackie said:
You don't have a natural constitutionally protected right to drive.OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
-
The right to bare arms in defense of oneself from all aggressors including but not limited to government forces is a natural right that always existed. The 2nd Amendment documented that the government could not take away that right.OZONE said:
And that is the only group that is guaranteed a "right" to arms. The rest was just revisionist action by the gov't to please the gun manufacturers, their shills the NRA, and those that grew up beating off to John Wayne movies.Blackie said:
The "militia" at the time the constitution was written wasn't what we think of as "militia" today. It was those (in addition to the army and navy) that the US government could call upon to serve at the whim of the government. Damned right the government's forces should be "well regulated" by an armed populace free to defend themselves.OZONE said:
And you don't have a protected right for anything beyond a well regulated militia.Blackie said:
You don't have a natural constitutionally protected right to drive.OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
-
Think about this. The right to self defense has always existed. But the right to have guns, has not. How could the right to guns have existed before guns existed?Blackie said:
The right to bare arms in defense of oneself from all aggressors including but not limited to government forces is a natural right that always existed. The 2nd Amendment documented that the government could not take away that right.OZONE said:
And that is the only group that is guaranteed a "right" to arms. The rest was just revisionist action by the gov't to please the gun manufacturers, their shills the NRA, and those that grew up beating off to John Wayne movies.Blackie said:
The "militia" at the time the constitution was written wasn't what we think of as "militia" today. It was those (in addition to the army and navy) that the US government could call upon to serve at the whim of the government. Damned right the government's forces should be "well regulated" by an armed populace free to defend themselves.OZONE said:
And you don't have a protected right for anything beyond a well regulated militia.Blackie said:
You don't have a natural constitutionally protected right to drive.OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
Any right to guns, exists only because the gov't allows it -- just like it does not allow individuals to own bazookas or anti aircraft guns.
The NRA has been brainwashing you.
-
The extent to which the constitution and the second amendment speak to this issue isn't about "guns". It's about "arms" (i.e. weapons).OZONE said:
Think about this. The right to self defense has always existed. But the right to have guns, has not. How could the right to guns have existed before guns existed?Blackie said:
The right to bare arms in defense of oneself from all aggressors including but not limited to government forces is a natural right that always existed. The 2nd Amendment documented that the government could not take away that right.OZONE said:
And that is the only group that is guaranteed a "right" to arms. The rest was just revisionist action by the gov't to please the gun manufacturers, their shills the NRA, and those that grew up beating off to John Wayne movies.Blackie said:
The "militia" at the time the constitution was written wasn't what we think of as "militia" today. It was those (in addition to the army and navy) that the US government could call upon to serve at the whim of the government. Damned right the government's forces should be "well regulated" by an armed populace free to defend themselves.OZONE said:
And you don't have a protected right for anything beyond a well regulated militia.Blackie said:
You don't have a natural constitutionally protected right to drive.OZONE said:
If you can't see the guns should be regulated at least as much as cars and driving, then you are a dumbshit. Doesn't matter if you are conservative or liberal.PurpleJ said:Liberals like ozone and honda celebrate mass shootings because they give them an excuse to pander for gun control.
Any right to guns, exists only because the gov't allows it -- just like it does not allow individuals to own bazookas or anti aircraft guns.
The NRA has been brainwashing you. -
Dear Ozone,
Blackie is schooling you. Stop while you're ahead.
Sincerely,
The Bored -
Tight gun regulations are working great in Chicago




