GOP stance on marijuana
Seems like a whole lot of the same old shit. Politicians who want big government in your private life. Just like the Dems.
Comments
-
I voted for Carter because he would legalize it
-
Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it.
-
That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days. -
Schedule 2 > Schedule 1
Until then, it will always be a federal issue.
HTH -
FIFYsarktastic said:Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights when they dont want to deal with an issue, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it.
-
The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
-
If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.HFNY said:The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
-
RaceBannon said:
I voted for Jefferson because he would legalize it
-
didn't you really mean to say FTUFY?2001400ex said:
FIFYsarktastic said:Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights when they dont want to deal with an issue, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it.
IF I wanted to make a stupid cheesy partisan post to divert from the topic, I would have. -
So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around.
In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget.DugtheDoog said:
If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.HFNY said:The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
-
I'm just posting fact. And both parties are fucked up and want big government. The only difference is the issue at hand.sarktastic said:
didn't you really mean to say FTUFY?2001400ex said:
FIFYsarktastic said:Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights when they dont want to deal with an issue, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it.
IF I wanted to make a stupid cheesy partisan post to divert from the topic, I would have.
HTH -
Religion strikes again.HFNY said:So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around.
In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget.DugtheDoog said:
If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.HFNY said:The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
-
You mean like the Rastafarian State game?ThomasFremont said:
Religion strikes again.HFNY said:So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around.
In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget.DugtheDoog said:
If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.HFNY said:The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
-
Jah, manRaceBannon said:
You mean like the Rastafarian State game?ThomasFremont said:
Religion strikes again.HFNY said:So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around.
In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget.DugtheDoog said:
If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.HFNY said:The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
-
I grow it in my greenhouse and give zero shits about what the GOP thinks
-
I buy it on the street and give zero shits what Jerry Brown thinks
-
Disagree.ThomasFremont said:That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws.
Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE!
-
No. That's fucking retarded.PurpleThrobber said:
Disagree.ThomasFremont said:That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws.
Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE! -
That's a well-thought out rebuttal.ThomasFremont said:
No. That's fucking retarded.PurpleThrobber said:
Disagree.ThomasFremont said:That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws.
Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE!
-
Clear case of abundance. From a legal and governance standpoint, it's absolutely a states' rights issue. Politically, those answers were punts.PurpleThrobber said:
Disagree.ThomasFremont said:That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws.
Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE! -
Congress needs to change weed from whatever schedule number it is that makes it a dangerous narcotic. That is what is interfering with the states that legalize and have medicinal MJ. The president could lead, Congress could act, but they are all a bunch of pussies.
Everybody does it. (Hi Little Jimmy Cornell) -
I await the day when we can have this discussion about cocaine.
-
Sad thing is, cocaine is already a schedule 2 drug while pot is a schedule 1.Swaye said:I await the day when we can have this discussion about cocaine.
-
I don't like it, but I voted for it because I don't give a fuck what other people do. I voted for gay marriage because I don't give a fuck what other people do. I just wish people would shut the fuck up about both subjects. Why do you give a fuck what other people do in other states?
-
I don't give a fuck what's in your greenhouse.OZONE said:I grow it in my greenhouse and give zero shits about what the GOP thinks
-
ksat.com/content/pns/ksat/news/2015/05/06/texas-house-committee-approves-bill-to-make-marijuana-legal-for-.html
"Republican state Rep. David Simpson of Longview argues marijuana comes from God and therefore shouldn't be banned by government.
The tea party stalwart has repeatedly championed what he calls the "Christian case" for legalization." -
Thanks for that hot take, Mitt. And why doesn't everyone just borrow $10,000 from their parents and start business?PurpleThrobber said:
Disagree.ThomasFremont said:That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws.
Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE!
Despite the fact that you've never actually been poor there are still poor people. People that live pay check to pay check. People that can't afford to just pick up their whole life and leave. And their rights aren't worth less than yours.
If this is the logic behind more states rights then it's pretty clearly class warfare. Rich people have the right to live however they want and poor people are fucked.
But how do you worship money? -
Marijuana and gay marriage are better topics than your other ones you pollute the board with.d2d said:I don't like it, but I voted for it because I don't give a fuck what other people do. I voted for gay marriage because I don't give a fuck what other people do. I just wish people would shut the fuck up about both subjects. Why do you give a fuck what other people do in other states?
-
Why do you give a fuck?allpurpleallgold said:
Thanks for that hot take, Mitt. And why doesn't everyone just borrow $10,000 from their parents and start business?PurpleThrobber said:
Disagree.ThomasFremont said:That's the Devil's weed!
PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws.
Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE!
Despite the fact that you've never actually been poor there are still poor people. People that live pay check to pay check. People that can't afford to just pick up their whole life and leave. And their rights aren't worth less than yours.
If this is the logic behind more states rights then it's pretty clearly class warfare. Rich people have the right to live however they want and poor people are fucked.
But how do you worship money?
-
Opium poppies come from god as well. Nice. I should start growing somePurpleJ said:ksat.com/content/pns/ksat/news/2015/05/06/texas-house-committee-approves-bill-to-make-marijuana-legal-for-.html
"Republican state Rep. David Simpson of Longview argues marijuana comes from God and therefore shouldn't be banned by government.
The tea party stalwart has repeatedly championed what he calls the "Christian case" for legalization."
