Why is this so difficult for some of you to understand?
Sark wanted Williams, not Browne - not a big loss
Garnett was never coming here - not a big loss
Sark didn't want Williams - not a big loss
Banner wanted to go to USC - not a big loss
Myles Jack was an idiot with serious character issues- not a big loss
Eason = unexplainable, gigantic, potential program-killing loss that proves that Petersen still does not get recruiting in the Pac-12. Also demonstrates his inability to connect with local superstars
Joyner - big whiff by Petersen. Only came back because he loved UW
That's the last time I'm going to explain it. If you still don't understand, I don't know what to tell you
Just thought some may appreciate an update of the goings-on the last two weeks on the doogman recruiting board courtesy of the CEO
Comments
-
Are we done now or do we need to keep going?
-
The people that are left there must really be mentally retarded.
-
Christ. Eason is still a junior. That this is even a conversation over there is FS.bananasnblondes said:Sark wanted Montana,not Heaps - not a big loss
Sark wanted Williams, not Browne - not a big loss
Garnett was never coming here - not a big loss
Sark didn't want Williams - not a big loss
Banner wanted to go to USC - not a big loss
Myles Jack was an idiot with serious character issues- not a big loss
Eason = unexplainable, gigantic, potential program-killing loss that proves that Petersen still does not get recruiting in the Pac-12. Also demonstrates his inability to connect with local superstars
Joyner - big whiff by Petersen. Only came back because he loved UW
That's the last time I'm going to explain it. If you still don't understand, I don't know what to tell you
Just thought some may appreciate an update of the goings-on the last two weeks on the doogman recruiting board courtesy of the CEO -
When you're wrong 81% of the time, you're right 19% of the time.bananasnblondes said:Sark wanted Montana,not Heaps - not a big loss
-
The Eason flip is going to be fun.
-
fixedbananasnblondes said:Sark wanted Montana,not Heaps - not a big loss
Sark wanted Williams, not Browne - not a big loss
Garnett was never coming here - not a big loss
Sark didn't want Williams - not a big loss
Banner wanted to go to USC - not a big loss
Myles Jack was an idiot with serious character issues- not a big loss
Eason = unexplainable, gigantic, potential program-killing loss that proves that Petersen still does not get recruiting in the Pac-12. Also demonstrates his inability to connect with local superstars
Joyner - big whiff by Petersen. Only came back because he loved UW
That's the last time I'm going to explain it. If you still don't understand, I don't know what to tell you
Just thought some may appreciate an update of the goings-on the last seven years on the doogman recruiting board courtesy of the CEO -
The correct answer is every one of those except Heaps was a big deal. We would have a good team this year with Banner, Garnett, Browne, and Jack.bananasnblondes said:Sark wanted Montana,not Heaps - not a big loss
Sark wanted Williams, not Browne - not a big loss
Garnett was never coming here - not a big loss
Sark didn't want Williams - not a big loss
Banner wanted to go to USC - not a big loss
Myles Jack was an idiot with serious character issues- not a big loss
Eason = unexplainable, gigantic, potential program-killing loss that proves that Petersen still does not get recruiting in the Pac-12. Also demonstrates his inability to connect with local superstars
Joyner - big whiff by Petersen. Only came back because he loved UW
That's the last time I'm going to explain it. If you still don't understand, I don't know what to tell you
Just thought some may appreciate an update of the goings-on the last two weeks on the doogman recruiting board courtesy of the CEO
On paper, Eason is a huge loss. I blame Sark for losing the other guys. I blame Petersen for Eason. -
BayDawg said:
The people that ever subscribed there must really be mentally retarded.
-
do you honestly think this is possible?TTJ said:The Eason flip is going to be fun.
-
No idea. But Peterman flips guys. And if the dm.c braintrust thinks it's impossible, that's a promising sign.Meek said:do you honestly think this is possible?
-
They were ready to crucify Peterman before he flipped Buttah Baker. He's going to need to prove he can keep in-state studs like him. I mean he's only signed two 4-stars combined at Boise State. Then when he flips Buttah right before signing day, he was coming here anyway and Peetamus had nothing to do with it=doog logic.
-
5-6 losses in this schedule would help.
Dawgs 2015-2016 SCHEDULE
Date Opponent / Event Location Time / Result
09/05/15 vs. Louisiana-Monroe Athens, Ga. TBA
09/12/15 at Vanderbilt * Nashville, Tenn. TBA
09/19/15 vs. South Carolina * Athens, Ga. TBA
09/26/15 vs. Southern University Athens, Ga. TBA
10/03/15 vs. Alabama * Athens, Ga. TBA
10/10/15 at Tennessee * Knoxville, Tenn. TBA
10/17/15 vs. Missouri * Athens, Ga. TBA
10/31/15 vs. Florida * Jacksonville, Fla. TBA
11/07/15 vs. Kentucky * Athens, Ga. TBA
11/14/15 at Auburn * Auburn, Ala. TBA
11/21/15 vs. Georgia Southern Athens, Ga. TBA
11/28/15 at Georgia Tech Atlanta, Ga. TBA -
That's Woodwardian bullshit there.priapism said:5-6 losses in this schedule would help.
Dawgs 2015-2016 SCHEDULE
Date Opponent / Event Location Time / Result
09/05/15 vs. Louisiana-Monroe Athens, Ga. TBA
09/12/15 at Vanderbilt * Nashville, Tenn. TBA
09/19/15 vs. South Carolina * Athens, Ga. TBA
09/26/15 vs. Southern University Athens, Ga. TBA
10/03/15 vs. Alabama * Athens, Ga. TBA
10/10/15 at Tennessee * Knoxville, Tenn. TBA
10/17/15 vs. Missouri * Athens, Ga. TBA
10/31/15 vs. Florida * Jacksonville, Fla. TBA
11/07/15 vs. Kentucky * Athens, Ga. TBA
11/14/15 at Auburn * Auburn, Ala. TBA
11/21/15 vs. Georgia Southern Athens, Ga. TBA
11/28/15 at Georgia Tech Atlanta, Ga. TBA -
I guess Woodward thought what made the SEC great was shit scheduling.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
That's Woodwardian bullshit there. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
-
10 out of the 12 Pac-12 teams do the same bullshit now.BallSacked said: -
-
I agree, but the point is that the Pac-12 has no high ground on this argument anymore. OOC football is dreckier than ever.BallSacked said: -
On to Part 2 ...bananasnblondes said:Sark wanted Montana,not Heaps - not a big loss
Sark wanted Williams, not Browne - not a big loss
Garnett was never coming here - not a big loss
Sark didn't want Williams - not a big loss
Banner wanted to go to USC - not a big loss
Myles Jack was an idiot with serious character issues- not a big loss
Eason = unexplainable, gigantic, potential program-killing loss that proves that Petersen still does not get recruiting in the Pac-12. Also demonstrates his inability to connect with local superstars
Joyner - big whiff by Petersen. Only came back because he loved UW
That's the last time I'm going to explain it. If you still don't understand, I don't know what to tell you
KeiVarae Russell — mom didn't like the University of Washington — not Sark's fault
Danny Mattingly — behaved like a douchebag on his visits to UW and Notre Dame. Don't want a guy like that in your program.
Caleb Smith — Some guys are better fits at a school like Oregon State. You need to understand this.
Scott Crichton — Take him over Josh Shirley? A 2-star guy over a 4-star guy? I am afraid you don't understand recruiting.
Michael Rector — Although it's fair to expect Washington to beat Stanford on the field, it is not fair to expect Washington to beat Stanford in recruiting. Plus, truth be told, Sark was happy to see Rector decommit.
Marcus Henry — Sark was in the lead for higher-rated guys in California. Can't blame him for those guys going somewhere else at the last minute.
Garrett Grayson — He was the third quarterback taken in the 2015 draft. So what. That doesn't matter when you have a chance to sign a quarterback like Derrick Brown.
Deandre Coleman — TW screwed that one up ... and zero time for Sark to fix it with him being forced at gunpoint to coach in USC's bowl game.
Budda Baker — Yes, Scott said his commitment to Oregon was set in stone. Things change. As Scott says, Peterson had nothing to do with this. Budda would've signed with Washington no matter who was coaching. We've been doing this a long time. We can't tell you everything we know. There is no agenda. -
Steve Kardashian was a lousy talent evaluator.
He recruited off web site lists.
He wouldn't have known shit about Bryce Sterk from Lynden.
Sark would've offered Fotu Leiato at the last minute minus any evaluation or consideration of whether Leiato fit with this recruting class or UW's roster. Just because Oregon, UCLA and a few other schools were circling, that would be reason enough. -
Leiato would have been an all American to the off season national title. I miss those days. On a tangent My favorite thing about sark besides the off season natty was how he would always talk shit about Oregon and how they weren't physical or their special teams or whatever and we would get our ass kicked.BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Steve Kardashian was a lousy talent evaluator.
He recruited off web site lists.
He wouldn't have known shit about Bryce Sterk from Lynden.
Sark would've offered Fotu Leiato at the last minute minus any evaluation or consideration of whether Leiato fit with this recruting class or UW's roster. Just because Oregon, UCLA and a few other schools were circling, that would be reason enough.
Peterman better start winning because seeing sark as a train wreck was pretty,entertaining. -
Update from the CEO:
Eason: HUGE loss. Could set the program back years since Skinny is a game changing QB. Future Heisman trophy winner and #1 overall pick.
Browning: He's technically still in HS. Hasn't done anything yet. Just like his coach, he still has a lot to prove. Jury is still out on whether he will ever amount to anything. -
IF, and it's a big IF, Eason were to come back to UW what exactly would the CEO say to the flock?
-
This:FreeChavez said:IF, and it's a big IF, Eason were to come back to UW what exactly would the CEO say to the flock?
BabsGilbyTawdTy said:Yes, Scott said his commitment to Georgia was set in stone. Things change. As Scott says, Peterson had nothing to do with this. Skinny would've signed with Washington no matter who was coaching. We've been doing this a long time. We can't tell you everything we know. There is no agenda.
-
Yeah, I saw that Kim is now bashing Browning as an avenue to putting Petersen down for not getting Eason.insinceredawg said:Update from the CEO:
Eason: HUGE loss. Could set the program back years since Skinny is a game changing QB. Future Heisman trophy winner and #1 overall pick.
Browning: He's technically still in HS. Hasn't done anything yet. Just like his coach, he still has a lot to prove. Jury is still out on whether he will ever amount to anything.
Also, Kim let slip that Max Browne is probably the best backup qb in the country.
This of course prompted, "So Kim, if Browne is really that good, how is he not a bigger loss than Eason, who is still in high school and totally unproven at the college level, especially since we have such limitations at qb this year?"
Kim: "I've gone over my reasons of why Eason is a bigger loss. I don't feel like repeating them. You can find them yourself." -
This thread is everything anyone needs or wants to know about Doogman and Kim.
These assholes don't have anything other than their own self interests in mind when it come to UW football. I hope Kim chokes on Sark's cock the next time Seven lets him suck on it. -
Shocking coming from a Whitman grad, and a couple of Wenatchee Valley CC dropouts.CheersWestDawg said:This thread is everything anyone needs or wants to know about Doogman and Kim.
These assholes don't have anything other than their own self interests in mind when it come to UW football. I hope Kim chokes on Sark's cock the next time Seven lets him suck on it. -
So Max Browne is better than whatever two guys at Ohio State aren't named the starter? Two Big Ten Players of the Year and the star of the National Championship game?bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, I saw that Kim is now bashing Browning as an avenue to putting Petersen down for not getting Eason.
Also, Kim let slip that Max Browne is probably the best backup qb in the country.
This of course prompted, "So Kim, if Browne is really that good, how is he not a bigger loss than Eason, who is still in high school and totally unproven at the college level, especially since we have such limitations at qb this year?"
Kim: "I've gone over my reasons of why Eason is a bigger loss. I don't feel like repeating them. You can find them yourself."
-
That whole exchange was hilarious. Kim initially tried to hype up Browne because a poster made a comparison to Eason and said Eason could very well end up being a career backup like Browne is on his way to become. Once Kim realized that hyping up Browne would in turn admit that Sark whiffed on him, he reverts back to his childish "I don't need to explain myself to you" routine.bananasnblondes said:
Yeah, I saw that Kim is now bashing Browning as an avenue to putting Petersen down for not getting Eason.
Also, Kim let slip that Max Browne is probably the best backup qb in the country.
This of course prompted, "So Kim, if Browne is really that good, how is he not a bigger loss than Eason, who is still in high school and totally unproven at the college level, especially since we have such limitations at qb this year?"
Kim: "I've gone over my reasons of why Eason is a bigger loss. I don't feel like repeating them. You can find them yourself."
I also find it very amusing that he genuinely thinks that his analysis that Eason is "the best HS QB I've seen in person since Brock" actually carries weight. Kim would have said the same thing about Browning if Sark had recruited him. -
Thanks for reading
