Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

We passed it so now we get to find out what's in it

PurpleJ
PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
«134

Comments

  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    @RaceBannon there is the text. So let me know your analysis when you are done reading it.

    @d2d death, show us the 4 cartoons you see that let you know Obama is a communist tyrant

    @puppylove_sugarsteel can't wait for your meds induced rant.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,040 Founders Club
    Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,040 Founders Club
    I just read it

    I was right
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

    Read my comments for comprehension.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    The FCC's net neutrality order seeks to prevent Internet providers from blocking Web traffic, slowing it down or setting up paid fast lanes. It reflects a year's worth of intense lobbying by carriers and Web companies — not to mention the public, whose 4 million written comments to the FCC helped convince the agency to adopt far more aggressive regulations.
    Sounds good to me.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,040 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

    Read my comments for comprehension.
    I was right
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    Fuck off Hondo. You're the guy telling us how great it is. Prove it

    Read my comments for comprehension.
    I was right
    Tell that to Death.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Actual rules are on page 283 to 290 (appendix A). Everything else is comments, history, legal justification, etc.

    The only part that we'd care about is 283-285 (oh god 3 pages of regulation!1), the rest is procedures for enforcing the rules.

    Direct link: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf

    No Blocking - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management
    No throttling - A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not impair or degrade lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.

    No paid prioritization - (a) A person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not engage in paid prioritization. (b) “Paid prioritization” refers to the management of a broadband provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (a) in exchange for consideration (monetary or otherwise) from a third party, or (b) to benefit an affiliated entity. (c) The Commission may waive the ban on paid prioritization only if the petitioner demonstrates that the practice would provide some significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the Internet.

    No unreasonable interference or unreasonable disadvantage standard for Internet conduct. Any person engaged in the provision of broadband Internet access service, insofar as such person is so engaged, shall not unreasonably interfere with or unreasonably disadvantage (i) end users’ ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of their choice, or (ii) edge providers’ ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to end users. Reasonable network management shall not be considered a violation of this rule.

    Just some of what's in there.

    Fucktards.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Thanks Fremont for your analysis. You are dialed in as always.

    @RaceBannon I'm still waiting for your analysis.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,040 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    Thanks Fremont for your analysis. You are dialed in as always.

    @RaceBannon I'm still waiting for your analysis.

    I was right