Kim & Co. Utter hatred for Peterson
Comments
-
Beattlenuts, like I said before you just aren't good at this....I am sure you can find a different hobby or board.
moveon.org -
What is the Peterman cleaned up the state shit? Oregon just signed the most players from Washington in the last fifteen years.
-
Hope you enjoy the leftovers.Mosster47 said:What is the Peterman cleaned up the state shit? Oregon just signed the most players from Washington in the last fifteen years.
-
Petersen got 6 of the 7 best players.Mosster47 said:What is the Peterman cleaned up the state shit? Oregon just signed the most players from Washington in the last fifteen years.
-
Oregon signed 3 players from WA, but Petersen only offered 1 (Thockmorton). Helfrich lost out on Adams, Potoae and Roberts, so really it was 3 to 1 in favor of Petersen last year in WA.Mosster47 said:What is the Peterman cleaned up the state shit? Oregon just signed the most players from Washington in the last fifteen years.
Also, FWIW, Oregon signed 3 players in 2003 from WA, so this isn't he most in the last 15 years. -
Considering u used the same lame joke twice I would say ur horrible at this move along doggiejecornel said:Beattlenuts, like I said before you just aren't good at this....I am sure you can find a different hobby or board.
moveon.org -
HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Petersen got 6 of the 7 best players.
Says who? Kim? -
Haha Mosster with the giant pivot. Keep going.
-
Didn't Peterman offer Leitau late?
-
NegativeAZDuck said:Didn't Peterman offer Leitau late?
-
-
Too bad, many of you still fund Kim's morning trips to Starbucks?
-
right click, save asSpoonieLuv said:@Mosster47 and @beelzebub after burning everyone on the bored.
-
-
So they never drink their own urine? At least I don't have to ask which one is beelzacunt.SpoonieLuv said:@Mosster47 and @beelzebub after burning everyone on the bored.
-
Something else to consider---
About ten years ago I belonged to a huge recreation vehicle-camping board. They had numerous sub boards and were/are the top internet information site for that industry. Then along came Camping World, a large corporation with RV related stores and dealerships nationwide.
RVNET as the site is now known had a board that was devoted to chatting about anything and everything. Politics, sports, you name it. And it would get extremely rowdy, even with moderators trying to keep things from going nuclear war between members. Once Camping World took over, the free style board took a turn towards heavy censorship and the banning of members. As a result a string of boards sprang up, started by and populated by orphaned former members of RVNET. RVNET still thrives becasue the bottom line is people go their for information.
I have often wondered whether this same situation has existed since Dawgman was gobbled up by FOX and now the new owners. Could it be that Dawgman has had to conform to corporate policies, policies that restrict/censor in order to meet the business model of the parent corporation? I'm simply throwing this out there as a possibility.
When members here trash Dawgman's moderators and Kim and crew, I think they ignore the fact that there is a lot of content found on that site that Scout provides, along with the various Scout regional staff. I like this board but it doesn't offer all that Scout has to offer. -
So you are saying that FOX is the reason that the LPT continue to gargle Sark's balls? That they are butthurt that he left UW? That they despise CP because he refuses to provide what they deem as their entitled access? That they have zero tolerance for anyone who disagrees with them on a bored?
Apples and oranges, @Vegasdawg -
Could not disagree more. Scout is terrible.Vegasdawg said:Something else to consider---
About ten years ago I belonged to a huge recreation vehicle-camping board. They had numerous sub boards and were/are the top internet information site for that industry. Then along came Camping World, a large corporation with RV related stores and dealerships nationwide.
RVNET as the site is now known had a board that was devoted to chatting about anything and everything. Politics, sports, you name it. And it would get extremely rowdy, even with moderators trying to keep things from going nuclear war between members. Once Camping World took over, the free style board took a turn towards heavy censorship and the banning of members. As a result a string of boards sprang up, started by and populated by orphaned former members of RVNET. RVNET still thrives becasue the bottom line is people go their for information.
I have often wondered whether this same situation has existed since Dawgman was gobbled up by FOX and now the new owners. Could it be that Dawgman has had to conform to corporate policies, policies that restrict/censor in order to meet the business model of the parent corporation? I'm simply throwing this out there as a possibility.
When members here trash Dawgman's moderators and Kim and crew, I think they ignore the fact that there is a lot of content found on that site that Scout provides, along with the various Scout regional staff. I like this board but it doesn't offer all that Scout has to offer. -
disagreeVegasdawg said:Something else to consider---
About ten years ago I belonged to a huge recreation vehicle-camping board. They had numerous sub boards and were/are the top internet information site for that industry. Then along came Camping World, a large corporation with RV related stores and dealerships nationwide.
RVNET as the site is now known had a board that was devoted to chatting about anything and everything. Politics, sports, you name it. And it would get extremely rowdy, even with moderators trying to keep things from going nuclear war between members. Once Camping World took over, the free style board took a turn towards heavy censorship and the banning of members. As a result a string of boards sprang up, started by and populated by orphaned former members of RVNET. RVNET still thrives becasue the bottom line is people go their for information.
I have often wondered whether this same situation has existed since Dawgman was gobbled up by FOX and now the new owners. Could it be that Dawgman has had to conform to corporate policies, policies that restrict/censor in order to meet the business model of the parent corporation? I'm simply throwing this out there as a possibility.
When members here trash Dawgman's moderators and Kim and crew, I think they ignore the fact that there is a lot of content found on that site that Scout provides, along with the various Scout regional staff. I like this board but it doesn't offer all that Scout has to offer. -
You belong to an RV message bored? Wow. Just wow.Vegasdawg said:Something else to consider---
About ten years ago I belonged to a huge recreation vehicle-camping board. They had numerous sub boards and were/are the top internet information site for that industry. Then along came Camping World, a large corporation with RV related stores and dealerships nationwide.
RVNET as the site is now known had a board that was devoted to chatting about anything and everything. Politics, sports, you name it. And it would get extremely rowdy, even with moderators trying to keep things from going nuclear war between members. Once Camping World took over, the free style board took a turn towards heavy censorship and the banning of members. As a result a string of boards sprang up, started by and populated by orphaned former members of RVNET. RVNET still thrives becasue the bottom line is people go their for information.
I have often wondered whether this same situation has existed since Dawgman was gobbled up by FOX and now the new owners. Could it be that Dawgman has had to conform to corporate policies, policies that restrict/censor in order to meet the business model of the parent corporation? I'm simply throwing this out there as a possibility.
When members here trash Dawgman's moderators and Kim and crew, I think they ignore the fact that there is a lot of content found on that site that Scout provides, along with the various Scout regional staff. I like this board but it doesn't offer all that Scout has to offer.
-
This board isn't supposed to be dm.c. Recruiting rankings are Bullshit. They do nothing for the longterm viability of the program. They are just charging you $10.95 to get information which is free on the internet.Vegasdawg said:Something else to consider---
About ten years ago I belonged to a huge recreation vehicle-camping board. They had numerous sub boards and were/are the top internet information site for that industry. Then along came Camping World, a large corporation with RV related stores and dealerships nationwide.
RVNET as the site is now known had a board that was devoted to chatting about anything and everything. Politics, sports, you name it. And it would get extremely rowdy, even with moderators trying to keep things from going nuclear war between members. Once Camping World took over, the free style board took a turn towards heavy censorship and the banning of members. As a result a string of boards sprang up, started by and populated by orphaned former members of RVNET. RVNET still thrives becasue the bottom line is people go their for information.
I have often wondered whether this same situation has existed since Dawgman was gobbled up by FOX and now the new owners. Could it be that Dawgman has had to conform to corporate policies, policies that restrict/censor in order to meet the business model of the parent corporation? I'm simply throwing this out there as a possibility.
When members here trash Dawgman's moderators and Kim and crew, I think they ignore the fact that there is a lot of content found on that site that Scout provides, along with the various Scout regional staff. I like this board but it doesn't offer all that Scout has to offer.
It's all fine and good to talk about recruiting now and again, but people here aren't trying live off of it. DM.c was always about the message boards, not the horribly written articles from the LPT and friends. Nor about the "inside" info, which wasn't all that insider anyhow. Kem was always a douche, but let people pretty much handle things on their own. Then, one day, he decided to start listening to his 60 year old base of posters who were offended at the slightest jab. It wasn't scout or fox. He continues to be a petulant child whenever people don't agree with him. This is happening more and more because the normal fan likes CP and is giving him a chance. Unlike his crusade to get everyone to hate him. -
*bored
-
I ran a hobby bored
-
I remember in the late 90's Samek was a god in the eyes of the posters. I remember calling him out on a post and it was hell fire missiles for a week. How dare you talk to David that way we are just lucky he provides this board for us.
I couldn't believe all these people having such a freak out over some guy. It was frankly epic.
Now he is the guy who let his board go to shit, predicted 12-0 and that is how dmc will be forever remembered.
-
To a logical person, it was about the message board, the interactions, etc. The CEO of said site didn't believe as much ... even when I tried to give him a little TCU MBA knowledge.FreeChavez said:
This board isn't supposed to be dm.c. Recruiting rankings are Bullshit. They do nothing for the longterm viability of the program. They are just charging you $10.95 to get information which is free on the internet.
It's all fine and good to talk about recruiting now and again, but people here aren't trying live off of it. DM.c was always about the message boards, not the horribly written articles from the LPT and friends. Nor about the "inside" info, which wasn't all that insider anyhow. Kem was always a douche, but let people pretty much handle things on their own. Then, one day, he decided to start listening to his 60 year old base of posters who were offended at the slightest jab. It wasn't scout or fox. He continues to be a petulant child whenever people don't agree with him. This is happening more and more because the normal fan likes CP and is giving him a chance. Unlike his crusade to get everyone to hate him. -
I'm guessing it was TL, and he didn't read.Tequilla said:
To a logical person, it was about the message board, the interactions, etc. The CEO of said site didn't believe as much ... even when I tried to give him a little TCU MBA knowledge. -
This was more about the novelty of the internet. back then, people thought whatever was said on the net was true because of the technology. Well...fast forward 20 years and it's easy to see why we shouldn't let random Dickwads like Samek and Kim run around cyberspace and claim Football Superiority Guy status. If anything, they can claim Faggot Teen Boy Stalking Status.jecornel said:I remember in the late 90's Samek was a god in the eyes of the posters. I remember calling him out on a post and it was hell fire missiles for a week. How dare you talk to David that way we are just lucky he provides this board for us.
I couldn't believe all these people having such a freak out over some guy. It was frankly epic.
Now he is the guy who let his board go to shit, predicted 12-0 and that is how dmc will be forever remembered. -
I'm siding more with the fact that he lacks intellectual depth and capacity to read anything more than 5 seconds worthDoogles said:
I'm guessing it was TL, and he didn't read. -
The irony is that Samek has publicly accused ME of having a God complex with this board, and the minions boost my ego, etc.jecornel said:I remember in the late 90's Samek was a god in the eyes of the posters. I remember calling him out on a post and it was hell fire missiles for a week. How dare you talk to David that way we are just lucky he provides this board for us.
I couldn't believe all these people having such a freak out over some guy. It was frankly epic.
Now he is the guy who let his board go to shit, predicted 12-0 and that is how dmc will be forever remembered. -
Obviously, many have a different opinion about Scout than I. As far as the eleven bucks a month, I have to laugh every time I read that.
