Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

But how are unions bad?

12346

Comments

  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    OZONE said:


    The idea of SkyMall was great but now I don't really see the benefit that they bring. I find that SkyMall really benefits the individual that runs SkyMall. If you don't believe me look or ask how much the SkyMall CEO made last year.

    Fixed it for you.

    Some of the government approved oligopolies and monopolies that control our economy fuck shit up more than the longshoreman do, and the executives running them earn a fuck of a lot more than a longshoreman.

    It's funny the hypocrisy that some conservatives barf out when they go on their rants.

    Read a fucking history book.

    And comprehend it.

    I guess you anti union folks want to return to the days when 14 year old kids worked 60 our weeks in coal mines... the "good old days" of true american capitalism.
    I am laughing you would insert SkyMall as your example.

    Like the Union, SkyMall is an antiquated business model who has met its demise.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    topdawgnc said:

    It's illogical to say "unions have outlived their usefulness." The relative conditions within the economy are no different than during this long-gone mythical period where everyone agrees (in hindsight) that unions were beneficial. You either believe in the efficacy of unions or you don't, but it's dishonest to claim two different standards.

    Union membership continues to decline. The reason is because when given a choice, people don't want to belong. The relative conditions have changed, significantly. Companies provide benefits to attract employees. It is now expected. We thank unions for their contribution. Now it is time for them to go.

    Anyone who believes a 14 year old would be pushed into sweat shops as a standard is smoking crack.

    The reality is the same one the logging industry faced. It wasn't the spotted owl that cost those guys their job ... it was technological advancements.
    I agree with your last point. On the first point however, declining unionization can only lead to backsliding while you wait for the workforce to go back and learn new skills.
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:


    The idea of SkyMall was great but now I don't really see the benefit that they bring. I find that SkyMall really benefits the individual that runs SkyMall. If you don't believe me look or ask how much the SkyMall CEO made last year.

    Fixed it for you.

    Some of the government approved oligopolies and monopolies that control our economy fuck shit up more than the longshoreman do, and the executives running them earn a fuck of a lot more than a longshoreman.

    It's funny the hypocrisy that some conservatives barf out when they go on their rants.

    Read a fucking history book.

    And comprehend it.

    I guess you anti union folks want to return to the days when 14 year old kids worked 60 our weeks in coal mines... the "good old days" of true american capitalism.
    I am laughing you would insert SkyMall as your example.

    Like the Union, SkyMall is an antiquated business model who has met its demise.
    That's the point. Unions are no worse than your typical american corporation with overpayed executives.

    Why do you hate america?



  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    OZONE said:

    topdawgnc said:

    OZONE said:


    The idea of SkyMall was great but now I don't really see the benefit that they bring. I find that SkyMall really benefits the individual that runs SkyMall. If you don't believe me look or ask how much the SkyMall CEO made last year.

    Fixed it for you.

    Some of the government approved oligopolies and monopolies that control our economy fuck shit up more than the longshoreman do, and the executives running them earn a fuck of a lot more than a longshoreman.

    It's funny the hypocrisy that some conservatives barf out when they go on their rants.

    Read a fucking history book.

    And comprehend it.

    I guess you anti union folks want to return to the days when 14 year old kids worked 60 our weeks in coal mines... the "good old days" of true american capitalism.
    I am laughing you would insert SkyMall as your example.

    Like the Union, SkyMall is an antiquated business model who has met its demise.
    That's the point. Unions are no worse than your typical american corporation with overpayed executives.

    Why do you hate america?



    I love America.

    It's the beauty of the free market.

    SkyMall bad ... it goes away.

    Why are there laws that force people to pay dues, but no laws that force people to buy from SkyMall?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    topdawgnc said:

    It's illogical to say "unions have outlived their usefulness." The relative conditions within the economy are no different than during this long-gone mythical period where everyone agrees (in hindsight) that unions were beneficial. You either believe in the efficacy of unions or you don't, but it's dishonest to claim two different standards.

    Union membership continues to decline. The reason is because when given a choice, people don't want to belong. The relative conditions have changed, significantly. Companies provide benefits to attract employees. It is now expected. We thank unions for their contribution. Now it is time for them to go.

    Anyone who believes a 14 year old would be pushed into sweat shops as a standard is smoking crack.

    The reality is the same one the logging industry faced. It wasn't the spotted owl that cost those guys their job ... it was technological advancements.
    I agree with your last point. On the first point however, declining unionization can only lead to backsliding while you wait for the workforce to go back and learn new skills.
    We aren't sending the workforce back to learn new skilzz. We are simply importing the workforce we need from around the globe and moving them here.

    Seriously... imagine you're Microsoft, Google, Amazon, etc... would you rather hire some dumbshit who took coding for two weeks in a retraining session with an IQ of 80 or hire somebody that's been coding every day of their life, has an IQ of 120 or better who is grateful to have a job in the United States and willing to work 60-70-80 hour weeks without whining?

  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    Mike Damone doesn't agree with any of this shit. He thinks it would be okay for workers to get paid 30 cents an hour if that's what the market dictates.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited January 2015
    Simple fact. If there were a class of citizens in the US that were considered undesirable and were relegated to slave status, like the Jews in Europe last century, most of our wonderful corporations wouldn't hesitate to exploit them in order to make a profit if it were legal to do so. Henry Ford is a case in point. He used slave labor in Nazi Germany (he should be posthumously stripped of his US citizenship, have his corpse dug up and be reburied in an unmarked grave). Corporations = institutionalized greed. They will gravitate toward the lowest common denominator that the laws allow. Unions at least keep some of them in check.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,558 Standard Supporter

    Simple fact. If there were a class of citizens in the US that were considered undesirable and were relegated to slave status, like the Jews in Europe last century, most of our wonderful corporations wouldn't hesitate to exploit them in order to make a profit if it were legal to do so. Henry Ford is a case in point. He used slave labor in Nazi Germany (he should be posthumously stripped of his US citizenship, have his corpse dug up and be reburied in an unmarked grave). Corporations = institutionalized greed. They will gravitate toward the lowest common denominator that the laws allow. Unions at least keep some of them in check.

    Cool 1930 story, brah.




  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Simple fact. If there were a class of citizens in the US that were considered undesirable and were relegated to slave status, like the Jews in Europe last century, most of our wonderful corporations wouldn't hesitate to exploit them in order to make a profit if it were legal to do so. Henry Ford is a case in point. He used slave labor in Nazi Germany (he should be posthumously stripped of his US citizenship, have his corpse dug up and be reburied in an unmarked grave). Corporations = institutionalized greed. They will gravitate toward the lowest common denominator that the laws allow. Unions at least keep some of them in check.

    Cool 1930 story, brah.




    Yeah it's cool, and still relevant today as long as humans are humans.
  • whlinder
    whlinder Member Posts: 5,388
    Hoomans gonna Hooman