Look who is on the cover of Sports Illustrated...
Comments
-
Great cover jinx, as always. Pats win.
-
Brady is pictured on the cover too, and his photo "higher up" on the page.PurpleJ said:Great cover jinx, as always. Pats win.
-
Retroactive jinx that lasted 57 minutesPurpleJ said:Great cover jinx, as always. Pats win.
-
Cancel your subscription to "Tiger Beat"?PurpleJ said: -
-
The Purple J jinx has a greater effect than the SI cover jinx.
-
Exactly. You guys think I am joking or trolling about New England winning, well you're wrong. Dead wrong. I've been saying it all along since the before the playoffs started. Patriots win. I feel it in my heart. As an unbiased observer who couldn't care less about the NFL, I have a built-in advantage. Don't you see? Tom Brady wants one more and he has the team to do it. He tends to get what he wants. This aint the Broncos. This is a real American dynasty who isn't going to roll over. They thrive in Arizona.
Pats 31
Hawks 20
GRONK! -
PI ON THAT PLAY
-
Who Dat
-
"The Hawks are losing in the NFC Championship game"PurpleJ said:Exactly. You guys think I am joking or trolling about New England winning, well you're wrong. Dead wrong. I've been saying it all along since the before the playoffs started. Patriots win. I feel it in my heart. As an unbiased observer who couldn't care less about the NFL, I have a built-in advantage. Don't you see? Tom Brady wants one more and he has the team to do it. He tends to get what he wants. This aint the Broncos. This is a real American dynasty who isn't going to roll over. They thrive in Arizona.
Pats 31
Hawks 20
GRONK!
-
Disagree. It was good clean defense. He probably got there a tenth of a second early but no way you can call that at game speed. Great job by Kearse to hang on, though.jecornel said:PI ON THAT PLAY
-
You only talk about the times I was wrong, and if it weren't for Mike McCarthy's limp trigger finger, I would have been right on both accounts.dnc said:
"The Hawks are losing in the NFC Championship game"PurpleJ said:Exactly. You guys think I am joking or trolling about New England winning, well you're wrong. Dead wrong. I've been saying it all along since the before the playoffs started. Patriots win. I feel it in my heart. As an unbiased observer who couldn't care less about the NFL, I have a built-in advantage. Don't you see? Tom Brady wants one more and he has the team to do it. He tends to get what he wants. This aint the Broncos. This is a real American dynasty who isn't going to roll over. They thrive in Arizona.
Pats 31
Hawks 20
GRONK!
hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/17108/who-wins-the-super-bowl
You guys already know that the repeat isn't happening. -
And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm. -
I'm not sure the Pats can take away Lynch, even if they want to. The only person capable of taking Lynch away is DarrellBevellFS
-
The over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
-
1) Russell Wilson ... best player on the field. Enough said about that. He has three years under his belt and will do everything possible to win the game.dnc said:
You over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
2) Offensive Line ... they average 332 pounds across the line and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Okung, Carpenter, Unger, Ossai, Sweezy, Bailey, and Britt. These boys have attitude and are ready to rumble.
3) Dan Quinn. Everybody speaks about the difference between Quinn and Gus Bradley. We will see a much improved defense from Quinn versus what Bradley showed the Pats 2 years ago.
4) Speed. Speed. Speed. This is the fastest Seahawk team in a long time. Robert Turbin, Jamaal Kearse, Ricardo Lockette, Paul Richardson, and Tharold Simon. While they often don't get their due respect, they will bring something that the Pats haven't seen before. Speed.
5) Time of Possession. I think the Hawks will dominate the time of possession behind the running of Wilson and Lynch. The more they can shorten the game and keep Brady's deflated balls off the field the better.
I think the Hawks win rather easily, say 34-17
What say you? -
You had me going until you called Wilson a "great" player. You lost all credibility with that one. Tom Brady is a great player. Russ is good, not great.
HTH -
I guess the Pats shouldn't even show up.Tequilla said:
1) Russell Wilson ... best player on the field. Enough said about that. He has three years under his belt and will do everything possible to win the game.dnc said:
You over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
2) Offensive Line ... they average 332 pounds across the line and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Okung, Carpenter, Unger, Ossai, Sweezy, Bailey, and Britt. These boys have attitude and are ready to rumble.
3) Dan Quinn. Everybody speaks about the difference between Quinn and Gus Bradley. We will see a much improved defense from Quinn versus what Bradley showed the Pats 2 years ago.
4) Speed. Speed. Speed. This is the fastest Seahawk team in a long time. Robert Turbin, Jamaal Kearse, Ricardo Lockette, Paul Richardson, and Tharold Simon. While they often don't get their due respect, they will bring something that the Pats haven't seen before. Speed.
5) Time of Possession. I think the Hawks will dominate the time of possession behind the running of Wilson and Lynch. The more they can shorten the game and keep Brady's deflated balls off the field the better.
I think the Hawks win rather easily, say 34-17
What say you?
-
This needs to be posted on Pats top fan forum. They will freak the fuck out. You'll get about ten pages of red before they see the troll.Tequilla said:
1) Russell Wilson ... best player on the field. Enough said about that. He has three years under his belt and will do everything possible to win the game.dnc said:
You over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
2) Offensive Line ... they average 332 pounds across the line and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Okung, Carpenter, Unger, Ossai, Sweezy, Bailey, and Britt. These boys have attitude and are ready to rumble.
3) Dan Quinn. Everybody speaks about the difference between Quinn and Gus Bradley. We will see a much improved defense from Quinn versus what Bradley showed the Pats 2 years ago.
4) Speed. Speed. Speed. This is the fastest Seahawk team in a long time. Robert Turbin, Jamaal Kearse, Ricardo Lockette, Paul Richardson, and Tharold Simon. While they often don't get their due respect, they will bring something that the Pats haven't seen before. Speed.
5) Time of Possession. I think the Hawks will dominate the time of possession behind the running of Wilson and Lynch. The more they can shorten the game and keep Brady's deflated balls off the field the better.
I think the Hawks win rather easily, say 34-17
What say you? -
Make sure to provide us a link. kthxbaiDoogles said:
This needs to be posted on Pats top fan forum. They will freak the fuck out. You'll get about ten pages of red before they see the troll.Tequilla said:
1) Russell Wilson ... best player on the field. Enough said about that. He has three years under his belt and will do everything possible to win the game.dnc said:
You over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
2) Offensive Line ... they average 332 pounds across the line and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Okung, Carpenter, Unger, Ossai, Sweezy, Bailey, and Britt. These boys have attitude and are ready to rumble.
3) Dan Quinn. Everybody speaks about the difference between Quinn and Gus Bradley. We will see a much improved defense from Quinn versus what Bradley showed the Pats 2 years ago.
4) Speed. Speed. Speed. This is the fastest Seahawk team in a long time. Robert Turbin, Jamaal Kearse, Ricardo Lockette, Paul Richardson, and Tharold Simon. While they often don't get their due respect, they will bring something that the Pats haven't seen before. Speed.
5) Time of Possession. I think the Hawks will dominate the time of possession behind the running of Wilson and Lynch. The more they can shorten the game and keep Brady's deflated balls off the field the better.
I think the Hawks win rather easily, say 34-17
What say you? -
If you don't think Wilson isn't a great player ... you really aren't paying attention.PurpleJ said:You had me going until you called Wilson a "great" player. You lost all credibility with that one. Tom Brady is a great player. Russ is good, not great.
HTH
Today's 5 best stats about Russell Wilson:
1) Wilson's career QB rating is at 98.6 and his lowest season rating was this year at 95. It took until Tom Brady's 7th full season to have a QB rating HIGHER than Wilson's LOWEST so far in his career. And remember, QB rating doesn't take into account Wilson's running ability.
2) For his career, Wilson AVERAGES just under 8 yards per attempt. That's a full half-yard more than Brady has throughout his career. In Wilson's 3 seasons in the league, he's been no lower than 6th in that category in any given year. The only other QBs that can say that over the past 3 years? Peyton Manning and Aaron Rodgers.
3) Against fellow QBs that have won Super Bowls, Wilson is now 10-0 in his career
4) People like to talk about QBR scores for a QB. And while stats and whatnot are important indicators of a QBs ability to make the plays necessary to win the game, sometimes it's the mistake that they avoid that is equally as, if not more, important in winning games. Since 2010, Tom Brady's record in games where the opposing QB had a higher QBR than him was 11-20 for a .355 winning percentage. Surprisingly, that's a tremendously high number when you consider that Aaron Rodgers is 1-17 and Peyton Manning 1-15 in those situations. Russell Wilson? How about 12-7 in those situations. So yes, I realize that his contract helps and that the team around him might just be a bit better, but Wilson's ability to manage games and make the plays when needed is staggering.
5) Finally, according to Football Reference, he's brought the Hawks from behind 10 times and led 15 game winning drives over the past 3 years. So while it's easy to point to the success of others on the team driving success, the reality is that Wilson is making the plays needed when they need to be made to win the game. That's elite. And for the record, 3 of those comeback and game winning drives were playoff games (and that doesn't include the comeback he had in his rookie year in Atlanta).
No matter how you slice it, Wilson is an ELITE QB. -
Jamaal Kearse made me seriously LOL.Tequilla said:
1) Russell Wilson ... best player on the field. Enough said about that. He has three years under his belt and will do everything possible to win the game.dnc said:
You over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
2) Offensive Line ... they average 332 pounds across the line and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Okung, Carpenter, Unger, Ossai, Sweezy, Bailey, and Britt. These boys have attitude and are ready to rumble.
3) Dan Quinn. Everybody speaks about the difference between Quinn and Gus Bradley. We will see a much improved defense from Quinn versus what Bradley showed the Pats 2 years ago.
4) Speed. Speed. Speed. This is the fastest Seahawk team in a long time. Robert Turbin, Jamaal Kearse, Ricardo Lockette, Paul Richardson, and Tharold Simon. While they often don't get their due respect, they will bring something that the Pats haven't seen before. Speed.
5) Time of Possession. I think the Hawks will dominate the time of possession behind the running of Wilson and Lynch. The more they can shorten the game and keep Brady's deflated balls off the field the better.
I think the Hawks win rather easily, say 34-17
What say you? -
Probably shouldn't ... between the distractions and Brady's aging arm doing his best Peyton Manning impression during the game ... 34-17 may be playing it a bit close to the vest.dnc said:
I guess the Pats shouldn't even show up.Tequilla said:
1) Russell Wilson ... best player on the field. Enough said about that. He has three years under his belt and will do everything possible to win the game.dnc said:
You over/under is fiveTequilla said:And what makes you think that the repeat ISN'T happening? I can give you a number of solid reasons WHY it WILL happen.
The funny thing that I keep hearing about is how the Pats do a good job of taking away whatever it is that you like to do best. With the Hawks, what are you trying to take away?
If you try to take away Lynch, that means that you're going to have 8 in the box and rarely have more than 1 safety deep (or like what the Packers did on the game ending play, playing Cover 0) ... if you do that, you play into the hands of the Hawks passing game that struggles to make 5-10 yard passes but is strong in making chunk plays.
If you try to take away the zone read from Wilson and keep him in the pocket by making sure that the edges are covered not only for the run, but also for pass plays and him escaping containment, then you run the risk of the center of your defense being open to Lynch runs as well as open pockets for Seahawk passing behind the LB/S spies that are in place to defend against Wilson (think the wheel routes that the Hawks ran to Lynch as well as more potential options for the TEs).
And if you try to take the big chunk plays away in the passing game by playing 2 safeties deep, then you don't have enough in the box to slow down Lynch or Wilson.
I'd be shocked if Wilson has anywhere close to as bad of a game as he had against the Packers. Normally, great players rebound tremendously well after bad games and tend to play one of their better games. I expect that from Wilson in this game as the Pats will most likely ask him to beat them with his arm.
2) Offensive Line ... they average 332 pounds across the line and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. Okung, Carpenter, Unger, Ossai, Sweezy, Bailey, and Britt. These boys have attitude and are ready to rumble.
3) Dan Quinn. Everybody speaks about the difference between Quinn and Gus Bradley. We will see a much improved defense from Quinn versus what Bradley showed the Pats 2 years ago.
4) Speed. Speed. Speed. This is the fastest Seahawk team in a long time. Robert Turbin, Jamaal Kearse, Ricardo Lockette, Paul Richardson, and Tharold Simon. While they often don't get their due respect, they will bring something that the Pats haven't seen before. Speed.
5) Time of Possession. I think the Hawks will dominate the time of possession behind the running of Wilson and Lynch. The more they can shorten the game and keep Brady's deflated balls off the field the better.
I think the Hawks win rather easily, say 34-17
What say you? -
He's a direct beneficiary of a strong running game and elite defense. You put him on a team like the 49ers and he's backing up Kaepernick.
-
That's PL_SS FS territoryPurpleJ said:He's a direct beneficiary of a strong running game and elite defense. You put him on a team like the 49ers and he's backing up Kaepernick.
-
This is why you're not running an NFL team. No, I take that back, this is why you could probably get a job with the Jets or Browns.PurpleJ said:He's a direct beneficiary of a strong running game and elite defense. You put him on a team like the 49ers and he's backing up Kaepernick.
-
I'll leave the trolling to the Pats to others ... I'll worry about getting my popcorn ready
-
Can't believe you guys are still falling for this.
-
I do honestly believe the Pats will win, though. That was not trolling. I'm sticking with that one.
