Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Kearse has problems

1234689

Comments

  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Lynn Swan? Jerry Rice? Wes Welker's hard hat mentality? Randy Moss?

    Fucking WRs aren't that important and if you think they are you're a fucking idiot.

    Here's football: OL, DL, QB... coaching that gets the most from the players. Nothing else makes a bit of fucking difference.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,175 Standard Supporter

    dnc said:

    Gladstone said:

    Be that as it may he always makes big plays in big games. Always.

    You are right stoneless, but great WR's catch most everything thrown within their reach. Kearse does not, which is why he was and is a free agent WR. Catch some drop some. Resign him for dolla's? Fuck no!
    I know I didn't make all my plays, but when they count, I MAKE 'EM.
    Cricket?
    No one hits big sixes better than Kearse.
    Boobies, a WR In the NFL is paid to make those catches. It's not like it was a once in a lifetime catch. Pretty simple post pitch and catch

    Exactly, it was clutch and not real easy with the decent coverage, but Wilson laid it in there well

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,437 Standard Supporter

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Lynn Swan? Jerry Rice? Wes Welker's hard hat mentality? Randy Moss?

    Fucking WRs aren't that important and if you think they are you're a fucking idiot.

    Here's football: OL, DL, QB... coaching that gets the most from the players. Nothing else makes a bit of fucking difference.
    I agree about the lines and QB. Thats the easiest way to success. That's not really the case for the Seahawks though. The OL isn't very good. DL is good, but probably the weakest unit on the defense. And Marshawn Lynch is really fucking important.
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Lynn Swan? Jerry Rice? Wes Welker's hard hat mentality? Randy Moss?

    Fucking WRs aren't that important and if you think they are you're a fucking idiot.

    Here's football: OL, DL, QB... coaching that gets the most from the players. Nothing else makes a bit of fucking difference.
    I agree about the lines and QB. Thats the easiest way to success. That's not really the case for the Seahawks though. The OL isn't very good. DL is good, but probably the weakest unit on the defense. And Marshawn Lynch is really fucking important.
    Yeah he is.

    Lynch is the foundation for all of it. Without him, our WR's don't sniff the ball and Russ doesn't pull it back and wheel around the end for 25 yards, ever.

    Watching his "why are you celebrating, this game isn't over" reaction after his late TD gave me a hard'n in my sweatpants, too.

    I love that fuckin guy.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,812 Founders Club

    Would you rather be Kearse and play in Super Bowls or Calvin Johnson and be the best in the game stuck in Detroit? Financially Johnson but Kearse has more fun.

    There's a reason the Pats and Hawks have average wideouts. They spend their money where it counts.

    Some dumbass team will sign Dez Bryant for 120 million dollars and their fans will be all Super Bowl bound! and shit. But it won't happen.

    Chicago has two great wide outs. Denver surrounded Manning with all sorts of "weapons". The Pats haven't won a Super Bowl in a decade because their defense got old and they went for offense. They have a good defense now again.

    Dare I say the NE defense is for real and the Seattle offense is not exactly a juggernaut and it wil be a tough game?

    Vegas agrees with you.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,812 Founders Club

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Marvin Harrison & Reggie Wayne in 2007.

    Runners up: Anquan Boldin with Baltimore in 2013 and Tory Holt with St. Louis in 2000.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,812 Founders Club

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Lynn Swan? Jerry Rice? Wes Welker's hard hat mentality? Randy Moss?

    Fucking WRs aren't that important and if you think they are you're a fucking idiot.

    Here's football: OL, DL, QB... coaching that gets the most from the players. Nothing else makes a bit of fucking difference.
    I agree about the lines and QB. Thats the easiest way to success. That's not really the case for the Seahawks though. The OL isn't very good. DL is good, but probably the weakest unit on the defense. And Marshawn Lynch is really fucking important.
    Lynch on offense and Thomas on defense.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Marvin Harrison & Reggie Wayne in 2007.

    Runners up: Anquan Boldin with Baltimore in 2013 and Tory Holt with St. Louis in 2000.
    None of those WRs were great.

    HTH
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,437 Standard Supporter

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Marvin Harrison & Reggie Wayne in 2007.

    Runners up: Anquan Boldin with Baltimore in 2013 and Tory Holt with St. Louis in 2000.
    None of those WRs were great.

    HTH
    I like to say Hall of Fame players aren't great.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dnc said:

    MelloDawg said:

    Would still take the No. 1 WR from half the teams in the NFL over Kearse. Probably 2/3, to be fair

    Is this a whoosh? There's probably 50 receivers you take over Kearse. Kearse isn't the #1 WR on the Hawks. Why do you keep comparing him to #1 WR's?
    Uhh dnc, kearse kinda is our #1 WR. The Salar y cap has made it that way. Either him or Baldwin...take your pick. Who the fuck else is? I understand what you're saying, but you have to face reality. We spent all of our money on defense. Cant afford a "#1" WR like Dez...even Golden Tate.
    Who was the last great WR to win a Super Bowl anyway?

    PL_SS has this one dialed in folks.
    Marvin Harrison & Reggie Wayne in 2007.

    Runners up: Anquan Boldin with Baltimore in 2013 and Tory Holt with St. Louis in 2000.
    None of those WRs were great.

    HTH
    I like to say Hall of Fame players aren't great.
    Which one of those four is in the Hall of Fame?