Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims:
Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Claiming 2014 is the 'hottest year' on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming 'pause' is continuing.' Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse: 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.' Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites
Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'
climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/
Comments
-
Balk?
Take this shit to the Lou Piniella Lounge. -
Still working on this one huh.
-
"The science is settled."jecornel said:Still working on this one huh.
-
Pretty sure that was the hottest year on Earth. -
It beat out the initial creation on the planet by 0.01 degrees Celsius.whatshouldicareabout said:
Pretty sure that was the hottest year on Earth. -
You are up there with puppy on the bullshit meter.d2d said:
Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Claiming 2014 is the 'hottest year' on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming 'pause' is continuing.' Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse: 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.' Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites
Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'
climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/ -
Stop Living In The Past!whatshouldicareabout said:
Pretty sure that was the hottest year on Earth.
-
I thought you were the guy with facts. The last guy that took on D2D on this subject is buried in an unmarked grave in Middelbury2001400ex said:
You are up there with puppy on the bullshit meter.d2d said:
Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Claiming 2014 is the 'hottest year' on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming 'pause' is continuing.' Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse: 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.' Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites
Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'
climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/ -
RaceBannon said:
I thought you were the guy with facts. The last guy that took on D2D on this subject is buried in an unmarked grave in Middelbury2001400ex said:
You are up there with puppy on the bullshit meter.d2d said:
Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Claiming 2014 is the 'hottest year' on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming 'pause' is continuing.' Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse: 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.' Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites
Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'
climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/
-
He posted the facts, they are right there. The last 18 years are the hottest years on record. Death's chosen news source lies to him and he believes it. 90 plus % of the world's scientists believe global warming is at least partially human caused. What else do you need to know?RaceBannon said:
I thought you were the guy with facts. The last guy that took on D2D on this subject is buried in an unmarked grave in Middelbury2001400ex said:
You are up there with puppy on the bullshit meter.d2d said:
Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues
Climate Depot's Marc Morano: 'Claiming 2014 is the 'hottest year' on record based on hundredths of a degree temperature difference is a fancy way of saying the global warming 'pause' is continuing.' Astrophysicist Dr. Dr David Whitehouse: 'The NASA press release is highly misleading...talk of a record is scientifically and statistically meaningless.' Climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer: ‘Why 2014 Won’t Be the Warmest Year on Record’ (based on surface data)– ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’
Climatologist Dr. Pat Michaels debunks 2014 ‘hottest year’ claim: ‘Is 58.46° then distinguishable from 58.45°? In a word, ‘NO.’
No Record Temperatures According To Satellites
Physicist Dr. Lubos Motl: ‘Please laugh out loud when someone will be telling you that it was the warmest year’
Climatologist Dr. Roger Pielke Sr.: 'We have found a significant warm bias. Thus, the reported global average surface temperature anomaly is also too warm.'
Climatologist Dr. Judith Curry: 'With 2014 essentially tied with 2005 and 2010 for hottest year, this implies that there has been essentially no trend in warming over the past decade.'
climatedepot.com/2015/01/16/scientists-balk-at-hottest-year-claims-we-are-arguing-over-the-significance-of-hundredths-of-a-degree-the-pause-continues/ -
Anything that disagrees with hondo is a lie. Got it. That 18 year bullshit is easily discredited by several scientific sources
-
Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics -
Learn to read.RaceBannon said:Anything that disagrees with hondo is a lie. Got it. That 18 year bullshit is easily discredited by several scientific sources
-
That's what I thought
-
Either you are that stupid, or you are trying to bait me. I'll go with both.RaceBannon said:That's what I thought
-
I like to reach into a bowl of 97 green skittles, pull out one of the 3 red ones, and then claim that it was an even odds proposition. I do that.
-
My solution? Continue in America our reduction in pollution. The bigger issue is China, India, and countries like those. We need to get them to clean up their act. If 90% of the world scientists are wrong, the worst case is we have a cleaner earth. Sounds like a win \win to me.RaceBannon said:Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics -
... sounds like a whine whine to me.2001400ex said:
My solution? Continue in America our reduction in pollution. The bigger issue is China, India, and countries like those. We need to get them to clean up their act. If 90% of the world scientists are wrong, the worst case is we have a cleaner earth. Sounds like a win \win to me.RaceBannon said:Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics -
Sounds like Honda supports WW3.
-
What will that accomplish? How long? What cost? Specifics2001400ex said:
My solution? Continue in America our reduction in pollution. The bigger issue is China, India, and countries like those. We need to get them to clean up their act. If 90% of the world scientists are wrong, the worst case is we have a cleaner earth. Sounds like a win \win to me.RaceBannon said:Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics
And we all know that the 97% consensus number is bullshit. Let's stick to the truth here ok? -
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists'_views_on_climate_changeRaceBannon said:
What will that accomplish? How long? What cost? Specifics2001400ex said:
My solution? Continue in America our reduction in pollution. The bigger issue is China, India, and countries like those. We need to get them to clean up their act. If 90% of the world scientists are wrong, the worst case is we have a cleaner earth. Sounds like a win \win to me.RaceBannon said:Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics
And we all know that the 97% consensus number is bullshit. Let's stick to the truth here ok?
Really we all just know that race is bullshit. -
Wikipedia? Really?2001400ex said:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists'_views_on_climate_changeRaceBannon said:
What will that accomplish? How long? What cost? Specifics2001400ex said:
My solution? Continue in America our reduction in pollution. The bigger issue is China, India, and countries like those. We need to get them to clean up their act. If 90% of the world scientists are wrong, the worst case is we have a cleaner earth. Sounds like a win \win to me.RaceBannon said:Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics
And we all know that the 97% consensus number is bullshit. Let's stick to the truth here ok?
Really we all just know that race is bullshit.
-
-
2001400ex said:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surveys_of_scientists'_views_on_climate_changeRaceBannon said:
What will that accomplish? How long? What cost? Specifics2001400ex said:
My solution? Continue in America our reduction in pollution. The bigger issue is China, India, and countries like those. We need to get them to clean up their act. If 90% of the world scientists are wrong, the worst case is we have a cleaner earth. Sounds like a win \win to me.RaceBannon said:Oh and I need to know your solution
With specifics
And we all know that the 97% consensus number is bullshit. Let's stick to the truth here ok?
Really we all just know that race is bullshit.
-
Exactly. I mean, why believe a website with links and sources to actual facts. We should believe the opinion website slanted for the purpose of profits.
-
College Douche Lives! How's that Middlebury Girls rhythm gymnastics team this year?2001400ex said:Exactly. I mean, why believe a website with links and sources to actual facts. We should believe the opinion website slanted for the purpose of profits.
-
Yep, I take it back; you're way too ignorant to be College Douche. Did you hear your president wants to send you to junior college for free? You can finally become a massage therapist on Capital Hill.2001400ex said: -
Global warming exists but who gives a fuck. People aren't going to start living like fucking hippies now are you insane? We're too comfortable living the good life. Damn near every fucking thing you do that makes our existence tolerable involves using energy. That means carbon emissions, fuckwads. Stop driving your cars or flying on airplanes if you're so concerned and then make sure everyone else in the world stops too and hey guess what were still fucked anyway. Our only salvation is that in the future when it becomes necessary to cool the planet back down , super smart scientists will figure the shit out and invent some global AC or some shit. All of us faggots will be long dead by then though, so light up a bowl, fire up the Hummer and let's all try to get laid while were young.
