Study Suggests Oregon is Doomed for a Downturn with Helfrich
Comments
-
I guess Oregon might as well stop fielding a football teamBallSacked said:If someone dropped a '5 reasons why Oregon will regress', AzDuckFS would refute it point by point right now, complete with headers and cross-references.
Such a fag Az. -
The 2nd biggest doog on this bored is a Broon
-
Dude,AZDuck said:
If it was all just a system, everyone would be doing it. Look, no reasonable duck expects you assholes to be falling over yourselves to exclaim how awesome Oregon is. But don't give in to bouts of willful self-delusion and wishful thinking just so you can go back to how it used to be, because that's even less likely than Helfrich being the next Knute Rockne.topdawgnc said:What Slingblade has going for him is the system.
It was designed to be easy and it is incredibly hard to stop.
Until someone, besides Holt, comes up with a defense that is a scalable blueprint ... Oregon will run the PAC.
The odds also say they will win a NC in the next 3-5 years.
It literally is next man up ... because of the system.
Sorry to pour sand in your panties.
Facts, are facts.
It is a system, which requires execution. Oregon does that well.
Time will tell if Slingblade can manage the system as well as Chip did. But even Chip himself has said he can put any QB in his system and it will be successful.
Kelly has said several times that he can make his system fit any quarterback.
It's a system ... and it is all about execution of said system in a fast way that gives the offense a very decided advantage. -
I think we're talking past each other. Yeah, there's a system. It's a spread. Like any spread, it tries to put skill players in space. Kelly was able to make Masoli successful because of the running threat both from Masoli but also LaMike and Droughns. This in turn opens up the passing lanes. I get all that. Leach's Air Raid is based on a similar principle, only it relies on 5 wideouts to ensure that one will be open on every play. Clearly one is executed better than the other. Also, I think that run-n-shoot offenses are kind of FS because defenses can blanket the field with quarters or zone coverages. But I digress.
Execution is coaching. I think Slingblade really answered the bell after the Arizona game, and the team's execution has been *really* good. He'd have to lose 6-7 games next year to warm the seat, anyway. -
Yes, he made it to the Larry Culpepper National Championship.AZDuck said:I think we're talking past each other. Yeah, there's a system. It's a spread. Like any spread, it tries to put skill players in space. Kelly was able to make Masoli successful because of the running threat both from Masoli but also LaMike and Droughns. This in turn opens up the passing lanes. I get all that. Leach's Air Raid is based on a similar principle, only it relies on 5 wideouts to ensure that one will be open on every play. Clearly one is executed better than the other. Also, I think that run-n-shoot offenses are kind of FS because defenses can blanket the field with quarters or zone coverages. But I digress.
Execution is coaching. I think Slingblade really answered the bell after the Arizona game, and the team's execution has been *really* good. He'd have to lose 6-7 games next year to warm the seat, anyway.
The further the players get from Chip, the closer we get to finding out how good Slingblade is at managing the system.
I don't know if he is a good coach. I do know Urban Meyer is better ... and Jim Harbaugh is better ... but other than that ... we shall see. -
My buddy has the data and runs it for various time periods. Cumulatively, Oregon has the #1 SRS for the last 8 years, 6 years etc.
Chip may have been questioned the first few games in 2009 but Oregon's ascension began when he was hired the OC. Its similar to how Osborne played a huge rule in Nebraska winning 2 NC's in the years after he became OC. In Boise's case, when Hawkins was coach many people were saying Petersen was the genius behind everything.
The point of the study was to show the pattern of regression in internal hires following an elite coach. The NC game outcome actually doesn't prove or disprove anything in all honesty. The real test will be years 4-5. The study shows that these coaches often don't regress until years 4-5 in many cases. -
Quuooooooksssss
-
This is a whole lot of words to say "Odds are good Slingblade can't be as good as the Fag because statistically, how many elite Coaches follow one after another."
That said, there is a shitload of doogery in this thread. Those fucking meth pumping assholes just played in the NC, a couple years after playing for an NC. Holy fuckall. I would give my right nut to have a "system team," even if I got my shit pushed in the NC. Christ. -
Every time Chest mentions SRS, God kills a kitten.AZDuck said:Read the thread and the original article. Chest mentions SRS post-season #1 as the moral equivalent of a natty. I'm just adopting the standards that Chest espouses. You guys should be happy
-
Running the PAC with their system won't get them a natty.topdawgnc said:What Slingblade has going for him is the system.
It was designed to be easy and it is incredibly hard to stop.
Until someone, besides Holt, comes up with a defense that is a scalable blueprint ... Oregon will run the PAC.
The odds also say they will win a NC in the next 3-5 years.
It literally is next man up ... because of the system.
They can get away with being soft because the rest of the conference sucks. When they face a REAL team like Ohio State or Alabama, they're fucked.
