Though on the cusp of a championship, the promotion of Mark Helfrich carries red flags, writes our resident Metrics Superiority Guy.
Read the full story here
Fuck you @creepycoug.And fuck you @DingaLing. Why don't you post something? I see you voting up/awesomeing the most critical comments.Oregon probably regresses faster than I thought. I just want Oregon to implode so I can be right. Seriously.Suck it bitches!! Fuck us and all who revel in the pain and displeasure of others.
Fuck you @creepycoug.And fuck you @DingaLing. Why don't you post something? I see you voting up/awesomeing the most critical comments.Oregon probably regresses faster than I thought. I just want Oregon to implode so I can be right. Seriously.Suck it bitches!!
Fuck you @creepycoug.And fuck you @DingaLing. Why don't you post something? I see you voting up/awesomeing the most critical comments.Oregon probably regresses faster than I thought. I just want Oregon to implode so I can be right. Seriously.Suck it bitches!! Fuck us and all who revel in the pain and displeasure of others. I'm good. An Oregon fan mocking UW's March Madness choke job against Louisville inspired that catchphrase.
Fuck you @creepycoug.And fuck you @DingaLing. Why don't you post something? I see you voting up/awesomeing the most critical comments.Oregon probably regresses faster than I thought. I just want Oregon to implode so I can be right. Seriously.Suck it bitches!! Fuck us and all who revel in the pain and displeasure of others. I'm good.
Fuck you @creepycoug.And fuck you @DingaLing. Why don't you post something? I see you voting up/awesomeing the most critical comments.Oregon probably regresses faster than I thought. I just want Oregon to implode so I can be right. Seriously.Suck it bitches!! Fuck us and all who revel in the pain and displeasure of others. I'm reveling in the vindication of my trashed article.#profilesincourage
Fuck your metrics, though.
SRS NATIONAL CHAMPS REPRESENTThis is at least as valid as a Helms Association natty
Read the thread and the original article. Chest mentions SRS post-season #1 as the moral equivalent of a natty. I'm just adopting the standards that Chest espouses. You guys should be happy
SRS is an objective measure of how good teams are. Oregon was the best team but the best team doesn't always win the championship in every sport. You can criticize using #1 SRS as a criteria point. If I eliminate that then Davis/Coker and Bo Schembechler/Moeller are off the board. I could widen the criteria but there wouldn't be that many more cases.Oregon being SRS #1 under Helfrich this season doesn't prove or disprove anything. Oregon has been the strongest SRS team over the past 6-8 seasons and it is a historical outlier that they haven't won a NC. Most teams with similar SRS dominance over 6-8 years won multiple NC's within the period. USC 2000s, Nebraska 1990s, Miami 1980s, Oklahoma 1970s, etc.Most of the internal hires that worked really well were in cases where the program had positive standing but room to reach another level (Chip, Belotti, Petersen, Osborne, Phil Fulmer). The ones that did not work long-term were in cases where the program essentially had only one way to go.
SRS is an objective measure of how good teams are. Oregon was the best team but the best team doesn't always win the championship in every sport. You can criticize using #1 SRS as a criteria point. If I eliminate that then Davis/Coker and Bo Schembechler/Moeller are off the board. I could widen the criteria but there wouldn't be that many more cases.Oregon being SRS #1 under Helfrich this season doesn't prove or disprove anything. Oregon has been the strongest SRS team over the past 6-8 seasons and it is a historical outlier that they haven't won a NC. Most teams with similar SRS dominance over 6-8 years won multiple NC's within the period. USC 2000s, Nebraska 1990s, Miami 1980s, Oklahoma 1970s, etc.Most of the internal hires that worked really well were in cases where the program had positive standing but room to reach another level (Chip, Belotti, Petersen, Osborne, Phil Fulmer). The ones that did not work long-term were in cases where the program essentially had only one way to go. But does this prove anything other than "it's really hard to hire two kickass coaches back to back?" Are there enough schools that had only one way to go that hired externally and didn't dropoff that we can prove something beyond SSS?I'm a big fan of metrics in general, but it seems like this can all be boiled down to "you're probably fucked when you lose an elite coach like Chip Kelly".
FREE PUB!!! Aubbie
Back in 1998 I read some doog bullshit called "The Oregon Myth" which was basically bullshit supposition unsupported by actual analysis. It was basically "Iron Laws, scoff, Oregon will revert to its historical mean and UW will kick ass."
Back in 1998 I read some doog bullshit called "The Oregon Myth" which was basically bullshit supposition unsupported by actual analysis. It was basically "Iron Laws, scoff, Oregon will revert to its historical mean and UW will kick ass." @fawgnews!!! true???
What Slingblade has going for him is the system.It was designed to be easy and it is incredibly hard to stop.Until someone, besides Holt, comes up with a defense that is a scalable blueprint ... Oregon will run the PAC.The odds also say they will win a NC in the next 3-5 years.It literally is next man up ... because of the system.
What Slingblade has going for him is the system.It was designed to be easy and it is incredibly hard to stop.Until someone, besides Holt, comes up with a defense that is a scalable blueprint ... Oregon will run the PAC.The odds also say they will win a NC in the next 3-5 years.It literally is next man up ... because of the system. If it was all just a system, everyone would be doing it. Look, no reasonable duck expects you assholes to be falling over yourselves to exclaim how awesome Oregon is. But don't give in to bouts of willful self-delusion and wishful thinking just so you can go back to how it used to be, because that's even less likely than Helfrich being the next Knute Rockne.