Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Anyone thoughts really change after last nights game?

13

Comments

  • Muttzen
    Muttzen Member Posts: 1,015

    Only thing that changed for me is I believe I have an unhealthy hatred for Cyler Miles that may need some counseling if it gets anymore hostile.

    Still holding onto my year 3 philosophy with Petersen. Praying to Allah Miles is not the QB by that year.

    Petersen gets 5 years. No coach could turn Sarks mess around in 3 years. Why do all you millenials expect miracles in 2-3 years? A coach needs 5 years to turn an 0-12 team around.

    This team is in worse shape now than when Sark took over. Sark didnt get stuck with Miles and Lindy. He already had Locker, and Ty already had Price commited. Open yo damn eyes.
    Ty was the real QB Guru, sadly enough.
  • FreeChavez
    FreeChavez Member Posts: 3,223
    That I should have woken up and filled my coffee cup with Jack Daniels to try and black out prior to remembering what happened last night
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,358
    topdawgnc said:

    Dwayne Washington did not really improve. He has the vision of grandpa Sankey.

    Miles never improved and was worse than I thought.

    Our wide receivers are worse than I thought.

    Their freshman qb and freshman wr abused us.

    Our safety play sucks bad. I'm sure king will be benched next year and baker has shown flashes but still gets beat way too much. In fairness to him he should never have been starting this year.

    At the beginning of the game the qb was getting rid of the ball so quick that our pass rush wouldn't have mattered if it was dominant. This tells me they obviously saw weaknesses to exploit when we lined up. Not a good day for the defensive staff.

    The offense sucks in every way you look at it. They knew all of our tendencies.


    Other than that I feel great about the future of this dreck.

    Loved when Gundy was a man and was calling to watch for the option on 4th and short ...
    Depending on the formation they also had no respect for the perimeter. Their linebackers splits were super compact because they new we were going to run it in the middle.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2015
    Something to think about is if we don't play like shit in the first half, we win and the tone is completely different. There was a thread after the game wondering how badly Boise will beat us next year. It's pretty shortsighted to have a different opinion on that game based off the fucking Cactus Bowl.

    Sarktastic would have three threads up about how great Petersen is and how much the team improved if we won.

    The time to be pissed was after Stanford, ASU, UCLA, and Arizona. A meaningless bowl game wasn't going to make this a successful season. It didn't tell us anything we didn't already know.

    We have QB and overall questions about the scheme and coaching on offense. We have to replace both lines. If you liked Petersen before, there is no reason to not like him now. If you questioned him before, obviously there was no visual evidence to change your mind.
  • Kaepsknee
    Kaepsknee Member Posts: 14,919

    Only thing that changed for me is I believe I have an unhealthy hatred for Cyler Miles that may need some counseling if it gets anymore hostile.

    Still holding onto my year 3 philosophy with Petersen. Praying to Allah Miles is not the QB by that year.

    Petersen gets 5 years. No coach could turn Sarks mess around in 3 years. Why do all you millenials expect miracles in 2-3 years? A coach needs 5 years to turn an 0-12 team around.

    This team is in worse shape now than when Sark took over. Sark didnt get stuck with Miles and Lindy. He already had Locker, and Ty already had Price commited. Open yo damn eyes.
    Except Sark improved his team by 7 wins his first Season

    And Peterman needed the softest OOC in the history of man AND an extra game to go -1, his 1st Season.


    So other than that..... you're spot on as always.


  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Something to think about is if we don't play like shit in the first half, we win and the tone is completely different. There was a thread after the game wondering how badly Boise will beat us next year. It's pretty shortsighted to have a different opinion on that game based off the fucking Cactus Bowl.

    Sarktastic would have three threads up about how great Petersen is and how much the team improved if we won.

    The time to be pissed was after Stanford, ASU, UCLA, and Arizona. A meaningless bowl game wasn't going to make this a successful season. It didn't tell us anything we didn't already know.

    We have QB and overall questions about the scheme and coaching on offense. We have to replace both lines. If you liked Petersen before, there is no reason to not like him now. If you questioned him before, obviously there was no visual evidence to change your mind.

    I stopped reading after you implied Okie State would coast in the second half of a close game like they did in the second half of a blowout.