Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

PM to Boobie

24567

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter
    edited January 2015
    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    By your logic, Arizona is the 2nd best PAC 12 team. So is Wisconsin the Big 10's 2nd best? Missouri in the SEC? Was UCLA better than Oregon in 2012? How about ASU in 2013?

    Arizona isn't the second best team because it won the South. Arizona is the second best team because it won the South AND because every but Oregon in the North is clearly worse than Arizona.

    If you somehow want to say that wins over UW, UCLA, and Maryland somehow make Stanford the second best team in the conference, you hate the Pac-12 more than I do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    It appears that there are a lot of Sark clones on this bored who think that almost winning games means more than actually winning games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,550 Founders Club
    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    So what happens on the field matters?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    Arizona got a much tougher opponent than USC and Stanford did, but Doogs hate facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    Arizona got a much tougher opponent than USC and Stanford did, but Doogs hate facts.
    I didn't know you considered yourself a doog?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RoadDawg55 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    Arizona got a much tougher opponent than USC and Stanford did, but Doogs hate facts.
    I didn't know you considered yourself a doog?
    You've been hating facts all over this thread. I'm glad you think beating Maryland somehow proves Stanford is a good team though.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    Arizona got a much tougher opponent than USC and Stanford did, but Doogs hate facts.
    I didn't know you considered yourself a doog?
    You've been hating facts all over this thread. I'm glad you think beating Maryland somehow proves Stanford is a good team though.
    Stanford was shit early in the year and lost games. Now they look like the 2nd best team in the Pac12

    Arkansas was shit early in the year and lost games. Now they look like the 2nd(?) best team in the SEC

    Beating Maryland is not a big fucking deal, neither is beating Texas. Both those teams seasons were really similar.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,795 Founders Club
    It's this FS logic that prevented Carroll's SC from ass fucking the SEC. Great teams get better as the season progresses, that's when the best football is played by the most cohesive units.

    Zona is not the second best team in the Pac, fuck your records. Don James sucked as head coach until january 1992 too.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    BallSacked said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    dnc said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    RaceBannon said:

    You can do that for every team. That's why I'll stick with what actually happened

    You will stick with it because you need to hang onto anything to continue the PAC 12 sucks mantra.
    Record against Pac12 teams? Arizona was second best.
    National ranking? Arizona was second best.
    Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.

    Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
    If you can't dig a little deeper to see they weren't the 2nd best team, I can't help you. They won't end up ranked 2nd best. I was unaware bowl games don't count. There are five Pac 12 teams ranked 10-25, including two Arizona lost against.

    Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
    Arizona got a much tougher opponent than USC and Stanford did, but Doogs hate facts.
    I didn't know you considered yourself a doog?
    You've been hating facts all over this thread. I'm glad you think beating Maryland somehow proves Stanford is a good team though.
    Stanford was shit early in the year and lost games. Now they look like the 2nd best team in the Pac12

    Arkansas was shit early in the year and lost games. Now they look like the 2nd(?) best team in the SEC

    Beating Maryland is not a big fucking deal, neither is beating Texas. Both those teams seasons were really similar.
    So you're saying the Pac-12 season started on November 22nd?

    http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/_/id/24/stanford-cardinal

    Even then, I'd take Arizona's wins over Utah and Arizona State during that time frame ahead of Stanford's wins over Cal, UCLA, and Maryland.

    Judging teams by selective time periods of a season instead of the entire season is fucktarded Doog logic at its best.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter