Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
By your logic, Arizona is the 2nd best PAC 12 team. So is Wisconsin the Big 10's 2nd best? Missouri in the SEC? Was UCLA better than Oregon in 2012? How about ASU in 2013?
4 ·
Comments
Arizona has a clear logical on the field claim to second in the PAC. Not sure why that is so difficult to accept.
Free Gurley!
I'd say it if Arizona had won.
National ranking? Arizona was second best.
Placement in conference bowel hierarchy? Arizona was second best.
Arizona was the second best team in the conference by every possible metric. This isn't some statistical fluke or relic of being in a worse division. They were the second best Pac12 team this year.
Missouri made the SEC title game, therefore they are better than Georgia, even though Georgia beat them 34-0 in Missouri.
If you somehow want to say that wins over UW, UCLA, and Maryland somehow make Stanford the second best team in the conference, you hate the Pac-12 more than I do.
Arkansas was shit early in the year and lost games. Now they look like the 2nd(?) best team in the SEC
Beating Maryland is not a big fucking deal, neither is beating Texas. Both those teams seasons were really similar.
Zona is not the second best team in the Pac, fuck your records. Don James sucked as head coach until january 1992 too.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/_/id/24/stanford-cardinal
Even then, I'd take Arizona's wins over Utah and Arizona State during that time frame ahead of Stanford's wins over Cal, UCLA, and Maryland.
Judging teams by selective time periods of a season instead of the entire season is fucktarded Doog logic at its best.