The standards of success for Husky Football 2013

dnc said:

Auburndawg said:

DerekJohnson said:

Here's how I view it...

1-5 wins disaster Agreed. Fired
6 wins extremely disappointing Fired
7 wins mediocrity defined, time for a new coach Agreed, but it won't happen
8 wins decent season, time for a new coach Hotseat
9 wins modestly successful season, Sark probably deserves another season Progress
10 wins successful season, Sark would deserve another season
11-13 wins Spectacular season; Sark would deserve extension and healthy raise

10+ wins and Sark IS the man.

Disagree. 10 wins and I'll support him staying around, but it's going to take much more than one above average season out of five to make Sark the man. He did a pretty good job in year one and has been below average each of the three years since. I like the defensive hires but he's going to have to do something more than one 10 win season to become anything close to the man.

10 wins, but with a plunger raping from Oregon and UCLA...is Sark still "the man"? Me thinks not.

Win a fucking Rose Bowl and then pop off.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

That large part of the fanbase thoroughly deserves another 0-12.

You?!

Sounds like you would love that. You seem to enjoy them losing more than winning. I believe that must have become a fan during the 2000 when the Huskies were bad. Therefore, you enjoy ripping on them for poor play and loses more than them winning.

This is the worst fan. Even the Ducks give us more create than you.

P.S. Get rid of the gay soccer gif...fag.