The standards of success for Husky Football 2013
Comments
-
YOU WOULD HAVE FIRED DON JAMES!!!111!!
-
Oregon St and Hawaii approve this post.He_Needs_More_Time said:
The team that almost got James fired in 1988 was better than any of Sark's teams too.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The worst part is that 6-5 Duck team deserved a bowl more than any of Sark's teams have. -
Fun fact I just looked up about James 1988 team that almost got him fired. In those 5 losses the Huskies lost by a combined 15 points.
Biggest loss of the year was to #2 UCLA 24-17. So James in the year that almost got him fired(who knows how close it really was) was pretty unlucky and we probably could have won 8-9 games that year.
While Sark has yet to have a season where the Huskies have outscored their opponents. -
In my heart that '88 team went 9-2He_Needs_More_Time said:Fun fact I just looked up about James 1988 team that almost got him fired. In those 5 losses the Huskies lost by a combined 15 points.
Biggest loss of the year was to #2 UCLA 24-17. So James in the year that almost got him fired(who knows how close it really was) was pretty unlucky and we probably could have won 8-9 games that year.
While Sark has yet to have a season where the Huskies have outscored their opponents. -
Difference between the coaches is Sark actually thinks his team last year was 9-4. Meanwhile James didn't look at his team as a team who caught breaks but instead decided he needed to make some coaching adjustments and changes to his program.DerekJohnson said:
In my heart that '88 team went 9-2He_Needs_More_Time said:Fun fact I just looked up about James 1988 team that almost got him fired. In those 5 losses the Huskies lost by a combined 15 points.
Biggest loss of the year was to #2 UCLA 24-17. So James in the year that almost got him fired(who knows how close it really was) was pretty unlucky and we probably could have won 8-9 games that year.
While Sark has yet to have a season where the Huskies have outscored their opponents.
-
I don't think James was in any serious trouble. He declined a raise. It was an integrity move; One I doubt Sark would make.
Of course, he bought himself a cushion with all the good teams he had. There were a few Rose Bowls & a few top 10 finishes... a bunch of top 20 finishes... Those always help. -
I also don't think he was in serious trouble because back then we had a good A.D. in Mike Lude. A lesser A.D. and he might have been fired.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I don't think James was in any serious trouble. He declined a raise. It was an integrity move; One I doubt Sark would make.
Of course, he bought himself a cushion with all the good teams he had. There were a few Rose Bowls & a few top 10 finishes... a bunch of top 20 finishes... Those always help.
Like I pointed out the team was 6-5 but when you lose 5 games by a combined 15 points you just had an unlucky year.
While Sark going 7-6 is the complete opposite. He was LUCKY to be 7-6 and in 2011 and especially in 2010 his Pythagorean W-L was like 4 to 5 wins. -
"lol"He_Needs_More_Time said:
I also don't think he was in serious trouble because back then we had a good A.D. in Mike Lude. A lesser A.D. and he might have been fired.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I don't think James was in any serious trouble. He declined a raise. It was an integrity move; One I doubt Sark would make.
Of course, he bought himself a cushion with all the good teams he had. There were a few Rose Bowls & a few top 10 finishes... a bunch of top 20 finishes... Those always help.
Like I pointed out the team was 6-5 but when you lose 5 games by a combined 15 points you just had an unlucky year.
While Sark going 7-6 is the complete opposite. He was LUCKY to be 7-6 and in 2011 and especially in 2010 his Pythagorean W-L was like 4 to 5 wins.
Mupphukkas be doogin left and right around here. Mods better watch that shit. Be creepin in and catch y'all unawares. Sven and Race hafta start a new Harvey dicksuck bored yet again.
-
Kind of like how I said in the other thread, 8-5 is only good if you blowout teams in your wins and then you have close losses. You dismissed that in the other thread as doogish.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I also don't think he was in serious trouble because back then we had a good A.D. in Mike Lude. A lesser A.D. and he might have been fired.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I don't think James was in any serious trouble. He declined a raise. It was an integrity move; One I doubt Sark would make.
Of course, he bought himself a cushion with all the good teams he had. There were a few Rose Bowls & a few top 10 finishes... a bunch of top 20 finishes... Those always help.
Like I pointed out the team was 6-5 but when you lose 5 games by a combined 15 points you just had an unlucky year.
While Sark going 7-6 is the complete opposite. He was LUCKY to be 7-6 and in 2011 and especially in 2010 his Pythagorean W-L was like 4 to 5 wins.
DJ had a track record though. -
I never said that year was good. Just illustrating how that was rock bottom for James was still better than any Sark season.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Kind of like how I said in the other thread, 8-5 is only good if you blowout teams in your wins and then you have close losses. You dismissed that in the other thread as doogish.He_Needs_More_Time said:
I also don't think he was in serious trouble because back then we had a good A.D. in Mike Lude. A lesser A.D. and he might have been fired.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I don't think James was in any serious trouble. He declined a raise. It was an integrity move; One I doubt Sark would make.
Of course, he bought himself a cushion with all the good teams he had. There were a few Rose Bowls & a few top 10 finishes... a bunch of top 20 finishes... Those always help.
Like I pointed out the team was 6-5 but when you lose 5 games by a combined 15 points you just had an unlucky year.
While Sark going 7-6 is the complete opposite. He was LUCKY to be 7-6 and in 2011 and especially in 2010 his Pythagorean W-L was like 4 to 5 wins.
DJ had a track record though.
HTH
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
