The depth chart is a thing of beauty
NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.
WIN NOW OR DIE (In a fire or elsewhere)
Comments
-
Auburndawg said:
Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.
NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.
WIN NOW OR ILL MAKE EXCUSES FOR WHY YOU DIDNT WIN LATER (In a fire or elsewhere) -
Excuses or reasons? Some of you need to learn the difference.Auburndawg said:Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.
NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.
WIN NOW OR DIE (In a fire or elsewhere)
-
It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.
Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.
Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes? -
You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth -
Definitely not.Auburndawg said:It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.
Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.
Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes? -
Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.MikeDamone said:You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth -
It's year 5 hthAuburndawg said:
Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.MikeDamone said:You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth -
It's ironic that you refer to yourself in the third person while referring to a coach infamous for referring to himself in the third person.Auburndawg said:
Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.MikeDamone said:You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth -
It's ironic that you refer to yourself in the third person while referring to a coach infamous for referring to himself in the third person.
Look up "Auburndawg, mythical character" It predates your arrival.
-
I have all the screenshots I need...see you in October.
-
You're a moron on both forums. HTHAuburndawg said:It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.
Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.
Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes?
-
The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles. -
Honestly the depth chart does look good until you get to the OL and DL then you realize we are fucked.
Then when you see who are head coach is you realize we are fucked.
If heading into year 5 with Mora let's say we had 4 straight ranked recruiting classes and had all this experience you'd be expecting 10 wins minimum.
However, with Sark you know our idiot doogs will accept 8 wins as "progress" and Pool Boy will give him an extension. -
If you had learned a single fucking thing from 0-12, you would have wanted Sark fired after his third year.Auburndawg said:
Perhaps. But it is a new day. And now there are no questions about "how long do you give a new coach." We are now where Ty was in year 3, which is when Auburndawg turned on him. No more excuses are possible.MikeDamone said:You're mocked not as a posi, but the king flip flopper.
Hth
Hope this helps even though I know it won't because you're still just as AuburndoogFS as ever. -
That scenario is very plausible, which is scary. Next year's pussy schedule sets him up for 9-5 or 10-4, but they will still probably be third in the north, or maybe second. That gets the Doogs so excited they cream their pants, and then in '15, they revert back to 7-6, but that's ok because of youth, injuries, altitude, new assistants/system, heat, wind, cold, snow, hurricanes, humidity, and climate change.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles. -
One of the best posts I have ever read.TheKobeStopper said:Auburndawg said:Jamora and Tanigawa are back. Upperclassmen and returning starters everywhere you look. 5th year QB in his third year as the starter. Playmakers on both sides of the ball.
NO EXCUSES. NONE. ZERO.
WIN NOW OR ILL MAKE EXCUSES FOR WHY YOU DIDNT WIN LATER (In a fire or elsewhere)
-
8-9 wins this year, 10 next year, 8 in 15, then 7 in 16 finally gets him fired. Realistic worst-case scenario.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
That scenario is very plausible, which is scary. Next year's pussy schedule sets him up for 9-5 or 10-4, but they will still probably be third in the north, or maybe second. That gets the Doogs so excited they cream their pants, and then in '15, they revert back to 7-6, but that's ok because of youth, injuries, altitude, new assistants/system, heat, wind, cold, snow, hurricanes, humidity, and climate change.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles.
I think Sark is opportunistic and is starting to feel the pressure as he realizes hes in over his head. If he can win 9 this year then his stock will be highest in 2014 and it makes sense for him to try to get an NFL job. He can get paid for a few years and come back to college and get a top 25 job in his late 40s. He will have made $2M/year for more than 10 years. However, if he stays at UW too long (losing Wilcox, Tosh, Sirmon, etc) and gets fired then he'll never make 7 figures again and unless he goes the NFL route and tries to climb the ladder over many years.
I think its more than plausible Sark is thinking this. However, the only catch is will someone in the NFL hire him. My hope is there is a team that needs a total 2-3 year rebuild and would therefore use him for the rebuild and fire him later when the rebuild was done. -
Sark already rebuffed the NFL
-
If we somehow won 9 or 10 this year and Sark jumped to the NFL, I would be ecstatic. I think we win 8 games at most though. The only bad part would be that there would be doogs who would say Sark was a great coach for us.
I really think we are looking at a 6-6 or 7-5 regular season, and I hope that gets Sark fired. I'm pretty sure 6-6 with a couple plungers would do the trick. -
Agree. Just when things look to be set up for that "special season," El Nino will rear its' ugly head and fuck everything up. I blame methane, but I support cows and spray-on deodorant.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
That scenario is very plausible, which is scary. Next year's pussy schedule sets him up for 9-5 or 10-4, but they will still probably be third in the north, or maybe second. That gets the Doogs so excited they cream their pants, and then in '15, they revert back to 7-6, but that's ok because of youth, injuries, altitude, new assistants/system, heat, wind, cold, snow, hurricanes, humidity, and climate change.HeretoBeatmyChest said:The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles. -
Could not disagree more. 6 wins and he is safe, but the seat gets warm. Gonna take 4 wins to get him out of here. He is dug into Woodwards ass like an Alabama tick.RoadDawg55 said:If we somehow won 9 or 10 this year and Sark jumped to the NFL, I would be ecstatic. I think we win 8 games at most though. The only bad part would be that there would be doogs who would say Sark was a great coach for us.
I really think we are looking at a 6-6 or 7-5 regular season, and I hope that gets Sark fired. I'm pretty sure 6-6 with a couple plungers would do the trick. -
Our depth-chart is--in no way--a thing of beauty. Did you forget to look at the depth at OL, which is the most important unit on the team?
What part of Ross Dolbec's fat ass and Coleman Shelton in the depth is good news to you? Our OL depth is absolutely embarrassing and our DL depth is about the same.
We basically have a depth chart that is a worst case scenario for this year:
-Kevin Smith's crappy play is the best we have at WR and he beat out 'leader' DiAndre Campbell.
-Jaydon Mickens got beat out by John Ross, which means Mickens did not improve substantially.
-Josh Perkins, who is the size of a WR, beat out 'try hard' Hartvigson at TE and so we will have to endure the idea that any time ASJ is not in the game, we can't run because we are 'undersized' at TE.
-Derrick Brown is on our roster.
-Ross Dolbec is our #2 RT -- he's a fat walk-on who stinks.
-Coleman Shelton is our #3 RT--we tried to gray shirt him (and the dm.c folks immediately came up with a fake cover story about his age) three weeks ago.
-Michael Kniep, who was supposed to be a decent walk-on, is not in the 2-deeps.
-Shane Brostek will probably not redshirt even though he needs it desperately.
-Andrew Hudson could not beat out a true freshman and was passed immediately by Kikaha.
-Josh Shirley has not improved enough to hold off Littleton.
-Travis Feeney (who has played like he could be an All-American) could not get consistent enough to beat out Fuimaono (who I like, but still)... and neither of them weigh enough.
-Will Shamburger is our 2nd best safety and he is a bad player.
-Tre Watson is his back-up.
-In year 5 we have two true-freshman back-up safeties and it's not because they are world beaters, we just don't have anyone else.
-It looks like we are determined to burn Jermaine Kelly's redshirt for no reason.
-Travell Dixon could not crack the 3 deeps at CB.
-
Don't forget potential Top 5 NFL pick James Atoe isn't in the 2-deeps.
-
HAHA I forgot about that. They ran a story that said he was greyshirting because he was 16 years old. Do they even think before they make this shit up and feed it to their subscribers? Even Sark isn't dumb enough to give a scholarship offer to a senior that's the age of a sophomore.Dennis_DeYoung said:Our depth-chart is--in no way--a thing of beauty. Did you forget to look at the depth at OL, which is the most important unit on the team?
What part of Ross Dolbec's fat ass and Coleman Shelton in the depth is good news to you? Our OL depth is absolutely embarrassing and our DL depth is about the same.
We basically have a depth chart that is a worst case scenario for this year:
-Kevin Smith's crappy play is the best we have at WR and he beat out 'leader' DiAndre Campbell.
-Jaydon Mickens got beat out by John Ross, which means Mickens did not improve substantially.
-Josh Perkins, who is the size of a WR, beat out 'try hard' Hartvigson at TE and so we will have to endure the idea that any time ASJ is not in the game, we can't run because we are 'undersized' at TE.
-Derrick Brown is on our roster.
-Ross Dolbec is our #2 RT -- he's a fat walk-on who stinks.
-Coleman Shelton is our #3 RT--we tried to gray shirt him (and the dm.c folks immediately came up with a fake cover story about his age) three weeks ago.
-Michael Kniep, who was supposed to be a decent walk-on, is not in the 2-deeps.
-Shane Brostek will probably not redshirt even though he needs it desperately.
-Andrew Hudson could not beat out a true freshman and was passed immediately by Kikaha.
-Josh Shirley has not improved enough to hold off Littleton.
-Travis Feeney (who has played like he could be an All-American) could not get consistent enough to beat out Fuimaono (who I like, but still)... and neither of them weigh enough.
-Will Shamburger is our 2nd best safety and he is a bad player.
-Tre Watson is his back-up.
-In year 5 we have two true-freshman back-up safeties and it's not because they are world beaters, we just don't have anyone else.
-It looks like we are determined to burn Jermaine Kelly's redshirt for no reason.
-Travell Dixon could not crack the 3 deeps at CB. -
Yet those morons eat it up or never call staff on it. If you do call staff on it well you are posting here because you'll be banned.bananasnblondes said:
HAHA I forgot about that. They ran a story that said he was greyshirting because he was 16 years old. Do they even think before they make this shit up and feed it to their subscribers? Even Sark isn't dumb enough to give a scholarship offer to a senior that's the age of a sophomore.Dennis_DeYoung said:Our depth-chart is--in no way--a thing of beauty. Did you forget to look at the depth at OL, which is the most important unit on the team?
What part of Ross Dolbec's fat ass and Coleman Shelton in the depth is good news to you? Our OL depth is absolutely embarrassing and our DL depth is about the same.
We basically have a depth chart that is a worst case scenario for this year:
-Kevin Smith's crappy play is the best we have at WR and he beat out 'leader' DiAndre Campbell.
-Jaydon Mickens got beat out by John Ross, which means Mickens did not improve substantially.
-Josh Perkins, who is the size of a WR, beat out 'try hard' Hartvigson at TE and so we will have to endure the idea that any time ASJ is not in the game, we can't run because we are 'undersized' at TE.
-Derrick Brown is on our roster.
-Ross Dolbec is our #2 RT -- he's a fat walk-on who stinks.
-Coleman Shelton is our #3 RT--we tried to gray shirt him (and the dm.c folks immediately came up with a fake cover story about his age) three weeks ago.
-Michael Kniep, who was supposed to be a decent walk-on, is not in the 2-deeps.
-Shane Brostek will probably not redshirt even though he needs it desperately.
-Andrew Hudson could not beat out a true freshman and was passed immediately by Kikaha.
-Josh Shirley has not improved enough to hold off Littleton.
-Travis Feeney (who has played like he could be an All-American) could not get consistent enough to beat out Fuimaono (who I like, but still)... and neither of them weigh enough.
-Will Shamburger is our 2nd best safety and he is a bad player.
-Tre Watson is his back-up.
-In year 5 we have two true-freshman back-up safeties and it's not because they are world beaters, we just don't have anyone else.
-It looks like we are determined to burn Jermaine Kelly's redshirt for no reason.
-Travell Dixon could not crack the 3 deeps at CB.
Our OL depth chart is an embarrassment for year five. -
The Oline cannot be argued, but the sad fact is that it is deeper than this exact time last year.
So you are bitching because actually have depth on the Dline? All I know is we are no longer starting Crichton, and that is a good thing. How is a negative getting Hau'oli back? I would take a guess that Hudson will be on the field for over 50% of the snaps. And Shirley and Littleton will split time. Where is the downside facing the up tempo teams?
And now we are mad because we finally have some depth at LB. This time the SR wins the battle so we bitch the younger guy coming of surgery did not win the spot. Pretty sure they will both see a lot of time.
I have a strange feeling the depth chart everyone is freaking out about will not match the actual playing time on Saturday. -
Auburndawg said:
It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.
Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.
Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes?
You flatter yourself.Auburndawg said:It's an odd thing. On Dawgman, Auburndawg is viewed as the lead nega. Heir to Race Bannon. Despised by Kim and Walla Walla Bill.
Here Auburndawg is the lead posi. Mocked by all.
Perhaps this means Auburndawg stands in the sensible center, hated by both extremes? -
Bcs era ends after this year dudeHeretoBeatmyChest said:The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles. -
LEAVE!!1!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Bcs era ends after this year dudeHeretoBeatmyChest said:The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles. -
If you can't see that puppylove is the best poster on this here bored then I can't help you.ThomasFremont said:
LEAVE!!1!puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Bcs era ends after this year dudeHeretoBeatmyChest said:The depth chart looks good- compared to the last 4 years. But Sark's teams have been the same over the past 4 years. No real development, no identity, no consistency and scattered results.
Theres enough talent to win 8-9 games but dont act like that suddenly makes Sark a good coach. He's not. I hope he does well but I also hope he's gone soon. I'm worried 3 years from now we'll be in the same spot with no BCS bowls or no pac-12 north titles.
![[Deleted User]](https://w0.vanillicon.com/0207c5b8d9863e3a221f61582bd6bfa3_100.png)
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
