Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

anyone who can't see improvement in this team from the 1st game till now

13

Comments

  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Some of you really don't get it
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives.

    You could have saved a lot of time and energy by simply stating this in the first place.

  • kh83
    kh83 Member Posts: 596
    I hate the fact that we lost 5 times and got plungered again at UO but to deny that we're seeing better football the last few weeks is EklundFS. Team is getting better, Peternorth has burned it to the ground and is building it back up. Now plunger the Cuogs and whatever dreck fest bowel team we play and we can start jo-ing about TBS and 2015
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,777 Founders Club

    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,128

    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
    You really are going full Cockus style with the extremes.
  • jecornel
    jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
    phineas said:

    All im saying is, a win over oregon fucking state doesnt mean its time to crown their ass. Some of you need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Alabama played william and mary or some such shit yesterday but you dont see their fanbase talking about "showing improvement" we are desperate for a winner but lets not get ahead of ourselves and start proclaiming ciley mylers is taking us to the rose bowl next year because he had a game late in the year against osu where he didnt fuck it up all by himself

    Correct if I am wrong but some would believe OSU's win over Arizona State a quality win. The Beavs don't instill fear in you in any phase but did have a quality win the week before.

    UW had their way with OSU in every phase of the game. Guys were put into position to make and they did so. Anyone see that Feeney pick? Was in good position made a great play.

    Who says Miles is taking UW to the rose bowl? This post is a dumpster fire of epic proportions.

    I don't mean to pile on but this post but it just sucks.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,777 Founders Club



    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
    You really are going full Cockus style with the extremes.
    You mean quoting the mick?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,128



    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
    You really are going full Cockus style with the extremes.
    You mean quoting the mick?
    Here is Mick's quote. "As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12."

    Nobody besides Tequilla predicted 12-1. Nobody wants Petersen fired. Nobody wants Sark back.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    Judging year 1 Petersen is the same as judging year 5 Sark is what I'm hearing
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    With a better than outside chance, Peterman gets 9 wins in year one... something Sark has been unable to achieve... ever.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,777 Founders Club



    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
    You really are going full Cockus style with the extremes.
    You mean quoting the mick?
    Here is Mick's quote. "As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12."

    Nobody besides Tequilla predicted 12-1. Nobody wants Petersen fired. Nobody wants Sark back.
    I know that's what he said.

    That's the point. It's fucking stupid. UW doesn't have that talent. To expect wins based off a flawed assumption is stupid.
    To call the season a complete failure is stupid

    If I was stupid enough to think that I'd want Petersen fired for going 7-5 with that talent. And I'd want the guy that recruited it

    Just like Kim does.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744



    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
    You really are going full Cockus style with the extremes.
    You mean quoting the mick?
    Here is Mick's quote. "As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12."

    Nobody besides Tequilla predicted 12-1. Nobody wants Petersen fired. Nobody wants Sark back.
    I know that's what he said.

    That's the point. It's fucking stupid. UW doesn't have that talent. To expect wins based off a flawed assumption is stupid.
    To call the season a complete failure is stupid

    If I was stupid enough to think that I'd want Petersen fired for going 7-5 with that talent. And I'd want the guy that recruited it

    Just like Kim does.
    There is a difference between having better talent than Stanford. And having enough talent to beat Stanford.
  • AtomicDawg
    AtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,330

    With a better than outside chance, Peterman gets 9 wins in year one... something Sark has been unable to achieve... ever.

    Sark was 4-5 his first season. Petersen has a chance to reach that on Saturday. Giving credit for shitty ooc wins is Kim fs.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    That's one fucked up statement that gets repeated too often.

    OOC wins/losses matter.

    Sources? Every fucking coaches contract in the NCAA. Every fucking coaches wiki page on the planet.
  • WilburHooksHands
    WilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    Race v RoadDawg? I fucking love this bored.
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,386
    Despite the loss, my eyes were telling me we were turning the corner @ Arizona. After a relatively impressive win against OSU, I'm thinking the the probability is a little higher.

    But eyes are just part of the equation...we beat the spread by 8 @ Arizona and then beat it by 17 against Oregon State. which is also trending in the right direction.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    I was GrundleFS to believe we had plenty of offensive talent returning, and also GrundleFS to doubt the defensive talent returning. I know that I know nothing.
    The season itself was a failure, we were out of the conference race 3 games in. The program development that's occurring during the season looks positive.
    -- The defensive backs have improved beyond all expectations even 3 games in.
    -- The true freshman that played looked good, the staff still knows how to find and development talent, even OUT OF THE WAC!1!!!
    -- Many veterans showing significant improvements. It could be simply maturity and experience, but the staff in place gets the credit.
    -- Clear progress made over the course of the season, accelerating in the last few weeks.
    -- Strong leadership at the top willing to make long term decisions.
    -- Loyalty within the program towards one another. In Pete's most criticized moments, Stanford fake punt and Shartgate, I feel that he was shielding players and coaches from outside scrutiny.
    -- Little things, from NOT leading the players out of the tunnel to what I've heard here & there about high standards in the lockerroom.
    -- This image
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,777 Founders Club

    Race v RoadDawg? I fucking love this bored.

    Mick tapped out. Road tapped in.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,777 Founders Club



    Yesterday was a good win. There's nothing to be upset about. There were a lot of positives. At the same time, we should have won. We are a better and more talented team than Oregon State.

    Better and more talented than every team except Oregon

    Just what I'm hearing
    You really are going full Cockus style with the extremes.
    You mean quoting the mick?
    Here is Mick's quote. "As I have said on several occasions, there is enough talent on this roster to beat anyone outside of Oregon in the Pac 12."

    Nobody besides Tequilla predicted 12-1. Nobody wants Petersen fired. Nobody wants Sark back.
    I know that's what he said.

    That's the point. It's fucking stupid. UW doesn't have that talent. To expect wins based off a flawed assumption is stupid.
    To call the season a complete failure is stupid

    If I was stupid enough to think that I'd want Petersen fired for going 7-5 with that talent. And I'd want the guy that recruited it

    Just like Kim does.
    There is a difference between having better talent than Stanford. And having enough talent to beat Stanford.
    Fair point. We also have enough talent to beat Oregon by that measure. Mick was livid over that loss too.

    I would have loved to see UW win some they weren't supposed to. But the thread was did they improve

    It shouldn't take 4 pages to acknowledge something so obvious.

    In the big scheme Petersen succeeded this year. We wouldnt be ripping Sark if he hadn't fucked this program for 5 years.

    I expect a lot more next year.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,128

    Race v RoadDawg? I fucking love this bored.

    Mick tapped out. Road tapped in.
    I tap out too.. I don't think this year was a success, but I am looking forward to the future. I need to see a little more before thinking Petersen will win a championship in the next few years.
  • SteveInShelton
    SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611

    Oregon St. has an identical record to Illinois who UW handled in similar fashion at home much earlier this year. I don't think it's improvement to do the same thing to a similar shitty opponent at home, that's what was expected.

    Sorting by record is first-level FS.

    Pac 12 is much stronger than the Big. Show me an advanced rating system that has Illinois ahead of OSU.

    Sorting by score is also first-level FS.

    Illinois moved the ball downfield through the air consistently on our inexperienced secondary. We benefited from timely turnovers (especially Shaq's 99 yard return) or the score would have been a lot closer. Lunt passed for 9.3 ypa.

    In contrast Mannion was largely neutralized.
    Both teams are really bad.
  • Dick_B
    Dick_B Member Posts: 1,301
    this thread delivers
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Roaddawg needs to see a championship.
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754

    Race v RoadDawg? I fucking love this bored.

    Mick tapped passed out. Road tapped in.
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    phineas said:

    Good thing my seahawks have another championship opportunity today, you wanna see improvement, watch a pete carroll coached team

    I would like to know why this post got downvoted and wtfd. Surely that was a mistake yea? Mods?
  • HuskyInAZ
    HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732
    This is a Husky Football forum, you dip shit. And bumping a Seahawks post from a month ago is a classic "12" move. Get a life.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    phineas said:

    phineas said:

    Good thing my seahawks have another championship opportunity today, you wanna see improvement, watch a pete carroll coached team

    I would like to know why this post got downvoted and wtfd. Surely that was a mistake yea? Mods?
    You do realize it took Pete 3 years to turn around the Seahawks right?
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    phineas said:

    phineas said:

    Good thing my seahawks have another championship opportunity today, you wanna see improvement, watch a pete carroll coached team

    I would like to know why this post got downvoted and wtfd. Surely that was a mistake yea? Mods?
    You do realize it took Pete 3 years to turn around the Seahawks right?
    Not true.

    Pete won the very first year fans became 12's.