So many here rant on Petersen and say they don't think he is the right guy.....
What in the fuck does it look like if you are not willing to LIPO? Stop posting here? Stop watching? Burn all you're husky hats?
It's as if you think not being willing to LIPO has any bearing on the fact that it will play out... Your over reactions to each win and loss and wild mood swings like a bitch on the rag are not LIPO behavior.
Comments
-
Some people need to step away from the keyboard, take a walk, and get a little perspective.
-
I would like to go on record that I am for going off the rails with every win and loss...but against LIPO.
-
You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
-
We don't deal in hypotheticalsRoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
-
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year. -
MikeDamone said:
Then to close the rant you say you are "willing" to LIPO.
What in the fuck does it look like if you are not willing to LIPO? Stop posting here? Stop watching? Burn all you're husky hats?
It's as if you think not being willing to LIPO has any bearing on the fact that it will play out... Your over reactions to each win and loss and wild mood swings like a bitch on the rag are not LIPO behavior.
YOUR Husky hats... -
I know you don't listen to the podacst, but I have some things to say on this perspective. Tune in, it will be a good one.
-
-
I was pretty much under the same expectations coming into the season. I was thinking they would squeak out 9 wins and compete for the 10th in the bowel.whatshouldicareabout said:
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
I will say that once I saw the reality of what they had to work with at QB, that I lowered my expectations for Pac-12 play and coming out 4-5 seemed about right. Call that moving the goalpoasts if you want, but I was basing that somewhat on the performance of Myley last year and the other returning starters on the OL. Maybe that was unrealistic and doogish, but I was holding out hope that he was gonna be they guy and would be more comfortable and successful. Thus far I that hasn't been the case. He may be making improvements, but fuck, it's painful to watch.
I'm disappointed like most everyone else, but not ready to give up on Petersen in year 1, and will probably be doogin' it up like a mutha-fucka going into next season when he has a whole other recruiting class and another year to install his system. -
TSWO after the failed fake punt vs. the Furd.
LIPO doesn't kick in again 9-5-15 on the Blue Turf.
Until then we can bitch all we want. -
Yeah, but if he loses the Apple Cup to the KEWGZ I will be on here ranting and raving like a 13 year old with her first crimson drip. If Pete can't beat our rivals I want him GONE!!!!!11!!!
-
Since you've been citing me as your poster child for Petersen loving ... I can give you a 100% guarantee that there would have been no chest beating with a win. We're where we are in this process ... it's behind where I hoped that it would have been.
But in some/many ways, lessons are driven home harder with losses than with wins and success.
And as always, people need some perspective. Idiots would have wanted Don James fired a dozen times over. -
Post game....why the hate bro?
-
I was predicting 10-3.
Don James won three Rose Bowls with redshirt soph quarterbacks, so I had high hopes for Miles. I hoped Sark could not have been as poor at developing quarterbacks as I had previously thought. I don't think Owen Twelve was that bad because Sark inherited Locker and Polk (not even his best players.) Ty inherited Stanback plus Sims/Rankin/James. Gilby inherited Cody and Alexis. Rick inherited Tui and 4 rb's that could start today.
I think a good qb and rb combination can go a long way to helping an offense(!). And I do not think any UW coach has ever inherited a less talented combo as did Pete. So maybe my inner doog is showing, but I was surprised at how little offensive talent this team had, especially in the key positions.
Getting Baker to switch may not be as big as getting Joe Steele to say No to ND and Nebraska, but I thought that was huge, especially since none of Goncharaf's NFL-bound players have (or will) ever play for Sark.
I thought this year would be better on the field, but I am infinitely more optimistic about the future today than I was at this time last year.
-
If you read my post, I said that. In other posts today I said that as well. Also in late September.RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
-
I cite you as the poster boy for Petersen loving? Where did I do that?Tequilla said:Since you've been citing me as your poster child for Petersen loving ... I can give you a 100% guarantee that there would have been no chest beating with a win. We're where we are in this process ... it's behind where I hoped that it would have been.
But in some/many ways, lessons are driven home harder with losses than with wins and success.
And as always, people need some perspective. Idiots would have wanted Don James fired a dozen times over. -
Not you Damone ... RD
-
-
Nailed it. I feel like I'm knee deep in menstrual blood with all the vaginas that are bleeding around here.MikeDamone said:Then to close the rant you say you are "willing" to LIPO.
What in the fuck does it look like if you are not willing to LIPO? Stop posting here? Stop watching? Burn all you're husky hats?
It's as if you think not being willing to LIPO has any bearing on the fact that it will play out... Your over reactions to each win and loss and wild mood swings like a bitch on the rag are not LIPO behavior. -
Three years.
You'll know what you have at that point.
I am pissed about Arizona. It felt good to have some passion about Husky football again.
The game moves too fast for Miles. -
-
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).whatshouldicareabout said:
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
-
LEAVE!!!1111!!!BallSacked said:
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).whatshouldicareabout said:
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it. -
Why not 10 wins? Look at Stanford, ASU, and Arizona, and tell me those games weren't winnable.BallSacked said:
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).whatshouldicareabout said:
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it. -
My expectations were 10 wins as well, but once Peterman basically said "What kind of shitshow did Sark run here," I dialed back accordingly. Guess I'll have to wait till next year for UW to make top 4 in.
-
I am moving the goalposts. These quarterbacks and running backs are Colorado State level. The defense is decent and not great (that shouldn't be a shocker). If they're 6-5 and in the Cactus Copper Bowel or whatever in two years, then RDWRYK and Pete can LEAVE.
-
of course I'm gonna let it play out. based on what we've seen one year in he doesn't appear to be the guy, but I'm not gonna write the book after one year.
If it's still this bad in 2016, then that's different -
I've only judged this season so I won't be right about anything if Petersen goes to the Cactus Bowl in year 3.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I am moving the goalposts. These quarterbacks and running backs are Colorado State level. The defense is decent and not great (that shouldn't be a shocker). If they're 6-5 and in the Cactus Copper Bowel or whatever in two years, then RDWRYK and Pete can LEAVE.
-
You guys are spewing a lot of hate-speech towards Cacti.
@SpoonieLuv - Drop some cacti porn on these haters. -
The Coogs game vs the ducks was also "winnable". They didn't win, so who the fuck cares.whatshouldicareabout said:
Why not 10 wins? Look at Stanford, ASU, and Arizona, and tell me those games weren't winnable.BallSacked said:
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).whatshouldicareabout said:
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)RoadDawg55 said:You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
Stanford & ASU are better than UW. The talent is more or less equal, but ASU/Stanford have been in and recruited to their system longer, they have built more depth and that doesn't require playing several true freshmen - UW doesn't have that; they have been run by adults for 3+ years - UW for less than a year. That shit matters. That's why they won.
Most saw UW as an 8 or 9 win team preseason (the public betting market, analysts like neu, their preseason ranking was more in line with 8 or 9 wins). It looks like UW will be an 8 win team and should have been a 9 win team (UA). Doogs said 10 or 11 wins. Doogs were wrong.
