You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
Why not 10 wins? Look at Stanford, ASU, and Arizona, and tell me those games weren't winnable.
My expectations were 10 wins as well, but once Peterman basically said "What kind of shitshow did Sark run here," I dialed back accordingly. Guess I'll have to wait till next year for UW to make top 4 in.
I am moving the goalposts. These quarterbacks and running backs are Colorado State level. The defense is decent and not great (that shouldn't be a shocker). If they're 6-5 and in the Cactus Copper Bowel or whatever in two years, then RDWRYK and Pete can LEAVE.
of course I'm gonna let it play out. based on what we've seen one year in he doesn't appear to be the guy, but I'm not gonna write the book after one year. If it's still this bad in 2016, then that's different
I am moving the goalposts. These quarterbacks and running backs are Colorado State level. The defense is decent and not great (that shouldn't be a shocker). If they're 6-5 and in the Cactus Copper Bowel or whatever in two years, then RDWRYK and Pete can LEAVE.
I've only judged this season so I won't be right about anything if Petersen goes to the Cactus Bowl in year 3.
You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
Why not 10 wins? Look at Stanford, ASU, and Arizona, and tell me those games weren't winnable.
The Coogs game vs the ducks was also "winnable". They didn't win, so who the fuck cares.
Stanford & ASU are better than UW. The talent is more or less equal, but ASU/Stanford have been in and recruited to their system longer, they have built more depth and that doesn't require playing several true freshmen - UW doesn't have that; they have been run by adults for 3+ years - UW for less than a year. That shit matters. That's why they won.
Most saw UW as an 8 or 9 win team preseason (the public betting market, analysts like neu, their preseason ranking was more in line with 8 or 9 wins). It looks like UW will be an 8 win team and should have been a 9 win team (UA). Doogs said 10 or 11 wins. Doogs were wrong.
The Coogs game vs the ducks was also "winnable". They didn't win, so who the fuck cares.
Stanford & ASU are better than UW. The talent is more or less equal, but ASU/Stanford have been in and recruited to their system longer, they have built more depth and that doesn't require playing several true freshmen - UW doesn't have that; they have been run by adults for 3+ years - UW for less than a year. That shit matters. That's why they won.
Most saw UW as an 8 or 9 win team preseason (the public betting market, analysts like neu, their preseason ranking was more in line with 8 or 9 wins). It looks like UW will be an 8 win team and should have been a 9 win team (UA). Doogs said 10 or 11 wins. Doogs were wrong.
Good to know that a difference of 1 win in predictions from back in July is the difference between being sane and being a doog. Where were you during fall camp to call people out?
I still stand by the 10-win prediction that I made before August started, and I still stood by it after the Hawaii and Eastern disasters. We could've been one play away from winning Stanford, ASU or Arizona and then the prediction could still be fulfilled. But no, we lost those games in the final minutes of the fourth quarter and the season is lost.
Also, it's funny you're here after the Arizona game to call us out. If Cooper doesn't fumble or any of the other 100 fuck ups in that game, would you still be here today to say 10 wins is lunacy when we'd still have the chance to win 10 games? What about at any other point prior to today?
You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
Maybe we should all do what you did and hide under the anonymity of a new name?
You make some good points Damone, but on the other end there are tons of gung-ho Peterman posters ready to suck him off if he beat Arizona. It goes both ways (75k).
My expectations this year were 10 wins and a good bowl game. I'm not moving my goalposts. Petersen didn't make it and won't make it this year. Nothing he can do will save this season (unless he gets Reuben Foster to commit, wowie!)
That doesn't mean I'm going to give up hope for the future. I still think Petersen is the guy, but I am disappointed with his first year.
The goalposts were built on fucktarded assumptions to begin with: great defense (check), average pac12 QB play (false as a motherfucker), Dwayne Washington and/or Coleman being a good RB duo (false), strong OL play (false).
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
of course I'm gonna let it play out. based on what we've seen one year in he doesn't appear to be the guy, but I'm not gonna write the book after one year. If it's still this bad in 2016, then that's different
Comments
New system, new QB, replacing the best RB and TE in the NFL draft, lost your best WR before the season started. And you expected the best UW football season since 2002? This team would have gotten Sark fired, but Peterson should get 10 wins out of it and a good bowl game? Christ.
You all were Doogs back in August and you didn't even realize it.
If it's still this bad in 2016, then that's different
@SpoonieLuv - Drop some cacti porn on these haters.
Stanford & ASU are better than UW. The talent is more or less equal, but ASU/Stanford have been in and recruited to their system longer, they have built more depth and that doesn't require playing several true freshmen - UW doesn't have that; they have been run by adults for 3+ years - UW for less than a year. That shit matters. That's why they won.
Most saw UW as an 8 or 9 win team preseason (the public betting market, analysts like neu, their preseason ranking was more in line with 8 or 9 wins). It looks like UW will be an 8 win team and should have been a 9 win team (UA). Doogs said 10 or 11 wins. Doogs were wrong.
I still stand by the 10-win prediction that I made before August started, and I still stood by it after the Hawaii and Eastern disasters. We could've been one play away from winning Stanford, ASU or Arizona and then the prediction could still be fulfilled. But no, we lost those games in the final minutes of the fourth quarter and the season is lost.
Also, it's funny you're here after the Arizona game to call us out. If Cooper doesn't fumble or any of the other 100 fuck ups in that game, would you still be here today to say 10 wins is lunacy when we'd still have the chance to win 10 games? What about at any other point prior to today?
Is Peterman the guy?