Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Time to bring in a bunch of JCs in this class...
DoogieMcDoogerson
Member Posts: 2,506
Has Peterman done a good with that in the past? Are there OKG JCs that can make an impact? WWDED ( What would Dennis Erickson Do? )
Comments
-
panic. It's what's for dinner.
-
We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
-
I'm hearing that UW's academies are too elite for JC xfers.
that's what I've always hearing. -
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
-
I think he's saying that he's taken his dick out of his good ear and is hearing different things now.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
-
I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
-
I am all for the JC model. ASU started 8 yesterday
-
The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.
-
UW doesnt have a PE major and doesnt accept PE credits. Most guys that go to a JC do so because the cant handle school very well. When at said JC they tend to take the easiest academic route, ie PE classes.RoadDawg55 said:The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.
-
I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.MikeDamone said:
I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too. -
I would never suggest that our fine school do something not classy like having sexy tutors or note taking programs or junk degree programs or coffee can payoffs, because that wouldn't be classy and we want to do things the right way. I would never want the medical center to sully their good name by offering a few pick me ups for the kids. We are just too classy for any of that cheating SEC stuff where you try to win at all costs. Classy liberals hate winning at all costs.
-
BayDawg said:
UW doesnt have a PE major and doesnt accept PE credits. Most guys that go to a JC do so because the cant handle school very well. When at said JC they tend to take the easiest academic route, ie PE classes.RoadDawg55 said:The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.
WeareAswahiliand Ebonicschool
-
I think you're missing the point. I'm not saying that in 20 games we need to see a championship level team. I'm saying we will have seen enough to know if petersen is the guy we hoped he'd be. Two recruiting classes and 20 games. If in 20 games the loses are not simply due to talent, but by getting out coached, not being prepared, or not being disciplined, we will know.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.MikeDamone said:
I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too. -
Makes sense. On top of that, I think judging next year is pretty simple. There should be marked improvement from the beginning to end of the season. I don't think that has happened this year, but there have been circumstances that make it difficult to judge.MikeDamone said:
I think you're missing the point. I'm not saying that in 20 games we need to see a championship level team. I'm saying we will have seen enough to know if petersen is the guy we hoped he'd be. Two recruiting classes and 20 games. If in 20 games the loses are not simply due to talent, but by getting out coached, not being prepared, or not being disciplined, we will know.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.MikeDamone said:
I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too. -
By the end of his first year James had beat USC for the first time in a decade and beat ucla in the same year and played Cal with a shot at the Rose Bowl in November. They were clearly better than at the start of the year.
Not seeing that from Petersen.
Just what I am hearing -
Basically we've lost to the same teams by roughly the same margins, except for ASU.
-
If Petermun can develop NFL talent in the MWC why can't he do this here? Did he get wetawd all of a sudden? I'm frustrated but still believe. Fuxk just kick me in th balls.
-
You guys don't realization the damage that frat boy recruiting has done to this program.RoadDawg55 said:The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.
-
Yesterday Huard and Ron Doe talked about this. They said, Peterman says: it's gonna take 18-24 games to get on track. By then, it should be clear what they're trying to do.MikeDamone said:
I think you're missing the point. I'm not saying that in 20 games we need to see a championship level team. I'm saying we will have seen enough to know if petersen is the guy we hoped he'd be. Two recruiting classes and 20 games. If in 20 games the loses are not simply due to talent, but by getting out coached, not being prepared, or not being disciplined, we will know.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.MikeDamone said:
I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.MikeDamone said:We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.
Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too.
... you may be on to something Damone -
He gets two years, which is basically 27 games, assuming there's a toilet bowl next year. If it's still this unsettled and inconsistent it will probably be time to worry. Until then, chillax.
-
Not too elite, just a weird transfer fit for many of the JC programs out there. Its really too bad as it seems like it could help.creepycoug said:I'm hearing that UW's academies are too elite for JC xfers.
that's what I've always hearing.
It would probably help if the state of washington had any good JC programs... the last one I recall getting a kid from was in Walla Walla I think and that was back in the 90s... can't remember his name or if he panned out but I think he was the kid that had a murder felony on his record (he was in a car during a crime in which somebody was killed).
Cory Dillon was a JC transfer... I think Rick also got a stud JC receiver that ended up transferring due to lack of playing time or something...
-
uzi said:
Not too elite, just a weird transfer fit for many of the JC programs out there. Its really too bad as it seems like it could help.creepycoug said:I'm hearing that UW's academies are too elite for JC xfers.
that's what I've always hearing.
horse. shit.
-
All this time it's been a Community college PE credits that's prevented UW from being able to compete in the PACn.
Who knew. -
You mean... If I gotta go the JC route because I was too stupid or too lazy (abundance?) to get C's in high school... I can't just play ping pong all day for two years and call it good?thechatch said:All this time it's been a Community college PE credits that's prevented UW from being able to compete in the PACn.
Who knew.
-
I think you're missing the point, kiddo.
-
thechatch is a serious asshole. I respect that.thechatch said:I think you're missing the point, kiddo.
-
If UW was serious about developing a legit JC program, they would do it. They could council players and get them placed at JC's and work with the guidance office at JC to ensure the kid is on a course pathway to UW in 2 years. It ain't that hard.
-
You don't get it. Placing guys are JC's is a risk because you may not want them in two years, and if they are good, they will have a bunch of other schools after them. It's a waste of time. If UW was serious about JC's they would start a PE major and ensure that JC players had an easy time getting in. They don't and so UW isn't an option for very many JC guys.sarktastic said:If UW was serious about developing a legit JC program, they would do it. They could council players and get them placed at JC's and work with the guidance office at JC to ensure the kid is on a course pathway to UW in 2 years. It ain't that hard.
-
Why take jc players who still don't get it... even after fucking up high school in the first place?
Kids out of jc with ping pong degrees deserve to be left out in the cold. -
I wonder what JC degree Corey Dillon had...sarktastic said:Why take jc players who still don't get it... even after fucking up high school in the first place?
Kids out of jc with ping pong degrees deserve to be left out in the cold.
