Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Time to bring in a bunch of JCs in this class...

Has Peterman done a good with that in the past? Are there OKG JCs that can make an impact? WWDED ( What would Dennis Erickson Do? )
«1

Comments

  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    panic. It's what's for dinner.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,807
    I'm hearing that UW's academies are too elite for JC xfers.

    that's what I've always hearing.
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

    We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.

    Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,807

    We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.

    Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.
    I think he's saying that he's taken his dick out of his good ear and is hearing different things now.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.

    Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.
    I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.
  • ShiftyShifty Member Posts: 3
    I am all for the JC model. ASU started 8 yesterday
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.
  • BayDawgBayDawg Member Posts: 1,623

    The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.

    UW doesnt have a PE major and doesnt accept PE credits. Most guys that go to a JC do so because the cant handle school very well. When at said JC they tend to take the easiest academic route, ie PE classes.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.

    Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.
    I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.
    I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.

    Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,558 Founders Club
    I would never suggest that our fine school do something not classy like having sexy tutors or note taking programs or junk degree programs or coffee can payoffs, because that wouldn't be classy and we want to do things the right way. I would never want the medical center to sully their good name by offering a few pick me ups for the kids. We are just too classy for any of that cheating SEC stuff where you try to win at all costs. Classy liberals hate winning at all costs.
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,894
    BayDawg said:

    The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.

    UW doesnt have a PE major and doesnt accept PE credits. Most guys that go to a JC do so because the cant handle school very well. When at said JC they tend to take the easiest academic route, ie PE classes.

    WeareAswahiliand Ebonicschool
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.

    Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.
    I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.
    I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.

    Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too.
    I think you're missing the point. I'm not saying that in 20 games we need to see a championship level team. I'm saying we will have seen enough to know if petersen is the guy we hoped he'd be. Two recruiting classes and 20 games. If in 20 games the loses are not simply due to talent, but by getting out coached, not being prepared, or not being disciplined, we will know.
    Makes sense. On top of that, I think judging next year is pretty simple. There should be marked improvement from the beginning to end of the season. I don't think that has happened this year, but there have been circumstances that make it difficult to judge.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,377 Founders Club
    By the end of his first year James had beat USC for the first time in a decade and beat ucla in the same year and played Cal with a shot at the Rose Bowl in November. They were clearly better than at the start of the year.

    Not seeing that from Petersen.

    Just what I am hearing
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,828 Founders Club
    Basically we've lost to the same teams by roughly the same margins, except for ASU.
  • claychaclaycha Member Posts: 662
    If Petermun can develop NFL talent in the MWC why can't he do this here? Did he get wetawd all of a sudden? I'm frustrated but still believe. Fuxk just kick me in th balls.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,807

    The JC model will never happen at UW. It's been talked about for years. Can someone give the specifics why it won't happen? Something about a PE major was what used to be said years ago on doogman.

    You guys don't realization the damage that frat boy recruiting has done to this program.
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208

    We are half way into my 18-20 games. At this point, I'm concerned.

    Last week you intimated that Petersen was on track and we'd see the team round into form the second half of next season.
    I didn't say he way "on track". I've always said 18-20 games and lipo. Half way to 20 games. I'm hopeful, but we are now seeing some things that are on coaching and not talent. Delay of game and 12 man on the field penalties should not be happening. Among other things. Again, lipo. Next year at this time we will know.
    I don't see what will change in another 9-12 games. The defense will be a dreckfest. Last night was a preview. Now take that and get rid of Shelton and Andrew Hudson. The offense will have the same skill guys without Shaq, who has easily become our best player on offense. The OL isn't good now, but it's hard to believe it will be improved losing 4 starters and a top reserve.

    Like it or not, this will be a 3-4 year process. There isn't much to be optimistic about other than a couple promising young guys, but there are always promising young players, and the other programs have them too.
    I think you're missing the point. I'm not saying that in 20 games we need to see a championship level team. I'm saying we will have seen enough to know if petersen is the guy we hoped he'd be. Two recruiting classes and 20 games. If in 20 games the loses are not simply due to talent, but by getting out coached, not being prepared, or not being disciplined, we will know.
    Yesterday Huard and Ron Doe talked about this. They said, Peterman says: it's gonna take 18-24 games to get on track. By then, it should be clear what they're trying to do.

    ... you may be on to something Damone
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,828 Founders Club
    He gets two years, which is basically 27 games, assuming there's a toilet bowl next year. If it's still this unsettled and inconsistent it will probably be time to worry. Until then, chillax.
Sign In or Register to comment.