What SoftyFS is hearing
Comments
-
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
Victoria Hayward (UW Softball player who just graduated) Chimes in:
-
Probably. It depends who else is available to play QB.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO -
NFL salaries and draft positions disagree.ThomasFremont said:
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
And Locker's greatness at safety is theoretical at best. A guy who can't ever stay healthy is supposed to excel at strong safety?
Disafuckingree. -
Now it's a whoooosh.dnc said:
NFL salaries and draft positions disagree.ThomasFremont said:
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
And Locker's greatness at safety is theoretical at best. A guy who can't ever stay healthy is supposed to excel at strong safety?
Disafuckingree.
C'mon man. -
Unless Ronnie Fouch is my other choice at QB, yes.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
Now if we're factoring in off the field/chemistry/culture stuff then that closes the gap some, but the context here was the on the field void Peters is leaving so I don't think that's a consideration.
-
Praise be to Locknah!ThomasFremont said:
Now it's a whoooosh.dnc said:
NFL salaries and draft positions disagree.ThomasFremont said:
I'd rather have a great safety than a great CB. That's just me.GrundleStiltzkin said:
Jake a better athlete, Peters a more effective player.ThomasFremont said:
So if you're putting a team together, you'd rather have Peters than Lockner?dnc said:
In that case, disafuckingreeThomasFremont said:
Nope.dnc said:
whoosh?ThomasFremont said:
Lockner was better than Peters. Not even close.RoadDawg55 said:
Peters was actually good on the field. This move doesn't matter because TSIO and he was leaving after the season anyways, but Peters was always really good.ThomasFremont said:
So was Jack H Lockner. #1 overall in fact.RoadDawg55 said:
Based on what? It would be great if true, but Peters was projected by many to be a first round draft pick.CuntWaffle said:
TSIO.RoadDawg55 said:
That's a pretty big assumption. Ross has a little experience at CB, but he's been practicing there for a week. To expect him to play at an All Conference level this season is a stretch.Tequilla said:FREE PUB!!!
No monster long post ... Peter's was given multiple chances to figure it out but he thought he was bigger than the team. Cancerous enough Apple that he can slow down the necessary culture change.
If Ross embraces the change to CB then there isn't a significant step backwards. We now know why Ross is at CB. And let's be honest, Ross' only asset at WR is his speed - that asset plays best at CB.
By next year I could see Ross being at the point where he isn't a significant step back. That's when it will count.
What good did that do?
Just stating the facts.
GTFO
And Locker's greatness at safety is theoretical at best. A guy who can't ever stay healthy is supposed to excel at strong safety?
Disafuckingree.
C'mon man. -
Based on what?SpoonieLuv said:
Fucktard Alert: I think we will be a Top 10 team circa the time @NWSportsNerd is thinking Peterman will be fired.MrsPetersen said:FYI guys, Peterman will be fired in two years according to this fucktard on Twatter:
