Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Get to 6-3 nothing else matters
Comments
-
Cards got their asses kicked by the Broncos (yes they ended up with a third string rookie qb during the game). Manning tore up their defense though. They seem due for a two game losing streak. Their skill guys are okay but nothing great. You need to knock Johnny Carson Palmer around some. It effects any statue q.b. (see Brady).
-
blockquote class="Quote" rel="dnc">
I'm not ready to put the division off the table either. The Cards are good but they're not this damn good, they beat our Iggles on a Hail Mary and beat the Cowboys thanks to Brandon Weeden. If Seattle can beat them at home in three weeks and be one game back for the rematch in Arizona the second to last week of the year it sets up for a classic Carson Palmer choke/injury/abundance.dhdawg said:
I agree. Carroll mentioned this morning they could get 6-7 guys back for next weekCuntWaffle said:Team is fine. LIPO.
he mentioned okung, unger, chancellor, hill and lane.
they should beat the struggling giants (they're 7-8 point favorites) and go to 6-3 heading into KC.
Seattle and SF were clearly the best teams in the NFC last year, I don't see any dominant teams that the seahawks absolutely couldn't beat if they sneak in as a WC.
OTOH Seattle's schedule is tougher down the stretch - each has four road games Arizona's slate of St Louis, Seattle, San Francisco, Atlanta is much easier than Seattle having KC, Arizona, SF, Philly. OTOH Arizona's home schedule is tougher: KC, St Louis, Detroit, Seattle vs NYG, St Louis, SF, Arizona. I'd rather have Arizona's schedule for sure but it's not inconceivable both emerge at 11-5 with Seattle winning both head to head and getting the tiebreaker.
Most importantly SF looks legimitately mediocre with not only the .500 record but a negative point differential. They're not a contender.
The Hawks lose at KC, Philly, NO and Arizona.
Cook it. -
So you're saying they make the playoffs?salemcoog said:
The Hawks lose at KC, Philly, NO and Arizona.
Cook it.
-
Injuries are killing the Seahawks. When healthy, they are still a very good team. Like you said, get to 6-3 and take it from there. It could look a lot different a month from now if the Seahawks get healthy.dhdawg said:
I agree. Carroll mentioned this morning they could get 6-7 guys back for next weekCuntWaffle said:Team is fine. LIPO.
he mentioned okung, unger, chancellor, hill and lane.
they should beat the struggling giants (they're 7-8 point favorites) and go to 6-3 heading into KC.
Seattle and SF were clearly the best teams in the NFC last year, I don't see any dominant teams that the seahawks absolutely couldn't beat if they sneak in as a WC. -
Arizona is a really good football team. Good running game, arguably one of the best WR trios in the NFL, and they play very good team defense. Have they caught some breaks this year? Yes. If romo plays Sunday I'm almost certain the cowboys win, the eagles choking away the game last Sunday, so I do think the 7-1 record is a bit flukey, however I can't see them winning less than 11 games, Seahawks almost have to sweep them. That Sunday night game week 16 could be for the divisiondnc said:
I'm not ready to put the division off the table either. The Cards are good but they're not this damn good, they beat our Iggles on a Hail Mary and beat the Cowboys thanks to Brandon Weeden. If Seattle can beat them at home in three weeks and be one game back for the rematch in Arizona the second to last week of the year it sets up for a classic Carson Palmer choke/injury/abundance.dhdawg said:
I agree. Carroll mentioned this morning they could get 6-7 guys back for next weekCuntWaffle said:Team is fine. LIPO.
he mentioned okung, unger, chancellor, hill and lane.
they should beat the struggling giants (they're 7-8 point favorites) and go to 6-3 heading into KC.
Seattle and SF were clearly the best teams in the NFC last year, I don't see any dominant teams that the seahawks absolutely couldn't beat if they sneak in as a WC.
OTOH Seattle's schedule is tougher down the stretch - each has four road games Arizona's slate of St Louis, Seattle, San Francisco, Atlanta is much easier than Seattle having KC, Arizona, SF, Philly. OTOH Arizona's home schedule is tougher: KC, St Louis, Detroit, Seattle vs NYG, St Louis, SF, Arizona. I'd rather have Arizona's schedule for sure but it's not inconceivable both emerge at 11-5 with Seattle winning both head to head and getting the tiebreaker.
Most importantly SF looks legimitately mediocre with not only the .500 record but a negative point differential. They're not a contender.
-
We will have to sweep Arizona to win the division. I fear that the Rams loss will end up costing us though. We have a very tough schedule left. @KC will be very tough and then you still have 4 against SF & Arizona and @Philly. That is 6 tough games and have to go 4-2 so that we can get to 11-5. 10-6 might not make playoffs.
-
No question on that. Two games back with half the season left and a more difficult schedule, they aren't passing them without a sweep.dhdawg said:
Arizona is a really good football team. Good running game, arguably one of the best WR trios in the NFL, and they play very good team defense. Have they caught some breaks this year? Yes. If romo plays Sunday I'm almost certain the cowboys win, the eagles choking away the game last Sunday, so I do think the 7-1 record is a bit flukey, however I can't see them winning less than 11 games, Seahawks almost have to sweep them. That Sunday night game week 16 could be for the divisiondnc said:
I'm not ready to put the division off the table either. The Cards are good but they're not this damn good, they beat our Iggles on a Hail Mary and beat the Cowboys thanks to Brandon Weeden. If Seattle can beat them at home in three weeks and be one game back for the rematch in Arizona the second to last week of the year it sets up for a classic Carson Palmer choke/injury/abundance.dhdawg said:
I agree. Carroll mentioned this morning they could get 6-7 guys back for next weekCuntWaffle said:Team is fine. LIPO.
he mentioned okung, unger, chancellor, hill and lane.
they should beat the struggling giants (they're 7-8 point favorites) and go to 6-3 heading into KC.
Seattle and SF were clearly the best teams in the NFC last year, I don't see any dominant teams that the seahawks absolutely couldn't beat if they sneak in as a WC.
OTOH Seattle's schedule is tougher down the stretch - each has four road games Arizona's slate of St Louis, Seattle, San Francisco, Atlanta is much easier than Seattle having KC, Arizona, SF, Philly. OTOH Arizona's home schedule is tougher: KC, St Louis, Detroit, Seattle vs NYG, St Louis, SF, Arizona. I'd rather have Arizona's schedule for sure but it's not inconceivable both emerge at 11-5 with Seattle winning both head to head and getting the tiebreaker.
Most importantly SF looks legimitately mediocre with not only the .500 record but a negative point differential. They're not a contender.
-
