This UCLA game is huge [prediction thread]
I say Petersen is who we all think he is. We get some TOs, Miles isn't completely terrible, and UW scrapes out a defensive slugfest 20-17.
Comments
-
-
I predict an overreaction from this board regardless of a win or a loss. Either way it will be interesting.
-
this IS a huge game. it's pretty much now or never for Race.
-
34-17 is always the prediction
-
UCLA 25, UW 11
-
It will be a close, ugly game. That is how both teams' games have gone this year. I predicted a UW win, but I'm not very confident about that.
-
If a gun was put to my head, which I've thought about doing, Hundley will be the difference in a close game. That guy ain't Mariota but he's way better than anybody the Huskies can put out there. 31-27 sounds about right.
-
RaccoonHarry said:
That guy ain't Mariota but he's way better than anybody the Huskies can put out there.
-
That is the most likely, but as uneven as both teams have been, I could see a 14-21 point win either way too.RoadDawg55 said:It will be a close, ugly game. That is how both teams' games have gone this year. I predicted a UW win, but I'm not very confident about that.
-
28-24.
Win goes to the fighting Mora's. -
I think you're being kind in calling UCLA good. They have been lucky as shit this year and could easily have 2 more losses. It has no bearing on whether UW winning again is important, but this isn't exactly oregon.
-
It wouldn't shock me this week if in a close game we see Shaq go back on defense in the 2nd half or 4th quarter to contain Hundley.
I think we win this week ... 24-20 -
I agree, but they are also one point from being 8-1. The Utah game came down to a missed FG. They have very good talent.They play down to their competition.FreeChavez said:I think you're being kind in calling UCLA good. They have been lucky as shit this year and could easily have 2 more losses. It has no bearing on whether UW winning again is important, but this isn't exactly oregon.
-
The other way to look at it is who has UCLA played worth a damn at this point?
Virginia and Texas in the non-conference are definitely mediocre teams - they struggled in both.
They've played 6 conference games. Cal and Colorado are dreckfests (somewhat allegedly, somewhat not). ASU was breaking in their backup QB and had a 10 minute meltdown. Arizona may not be as good as their win at Oregon would suggest they are. They got run off the field against Oregon. Utah punched them in the mouth enough to win the game.
Bottom line to me is that I really don't think we have a clue how good UCLA is. We know they have talent, but all of the evidence points to them not being particularly well coached and not a disciplined football team. I'm not sure that we can say that they play down to the level of their competition. Instead, I think that they have flaws (see their OL) that get exposed by the fact that they can't coach around those flaws. -
2-1 dawgs. UCLA tries to equalize late, but a red card prevents them from mounting backside penetration.
-
Are you forgetting that UW sucks? Who have we beat?Tequilla said:The other way to look at it is who has UCLA played worth a damn at this point?
Virginia and Texas in the non-conference are definitely mediocre teams - they struggled in both.
They've played 6 conference games. Cal and Colorado are dreckfests (somewhat allegedly, somewhat not). ASU was breaking in their backup QB and had a 10 minute meltdown. Arizona may not be as good as their win at Oregon would suggest they are. They got run off the field against Oregon. Utah punched them in the mouth enough to win the game.
Bottom line to me is that I really don't think we have a clue how good UCLA is. We know they have talent, but all of the evidence points to them not being particularly well coached and not a disciplined football team. I'm not sure that we can say that they play down to the level of their competition. Instead, I think that they have flaws (see their OL) that get exposed by the fact that they can't coach around those flaws. -
Defenses and special teams will outscore the offenses = Dreckfest and IDGAF
-
UCLA will score at least 40. UW won't.
HTH -
Neither team is putting up 40.Blackie said:UCLA will score at least 40. UW won't.
HTH
-
Not a chance in hell.Blackie said:UCLA will score at least 40. UW won't.
HTH -
They playing a two game series?Blackie said:UCLA will score at least 40. UW won't.
HTH
-
and USC is a hail mary and playing rush defense away from the BCSRoadDawg55 said:
I agree, but they are also one point from being 8-1. The Utah game came down to a missed FG. They have very good talent.They play down to their competition.FreeChavez said:I think you're being kind in calling UCLA good. They have been lucky as shit this year and could easily have 2 more losses. It has no bearing on whether UW winning again is important, but this isn't exactly oregon.
-
Praise Allah for @Blackie whooshing people in this otherwise regrettable thread.
One Pac-12 mediocrity beating another is not a signature win. -
Don't cry, boobs
-
Gladstone said:
Don't leak, boobs
-
Will this signature win mean more or less to you than Sark's 2010 signature win over USC?Gladstone said:Don't cry, boobs
-
20-10 UW. D-line getting tons of pressure/sacks will disrupt their offense into dreck and Hundley will throw a pick or two which will be the difference. UW offense will run like last week minus the fucktarded fumbles.
-
More but it's not a signature it's a processTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Will this signature win mean more or less to you than Sark's 2010 signature win over USC?Gladstone said:Don't cry, boobs
-
UCLA 24 - UW17
-
The guy in my office in the wheelchair told me "That linebacker they have at runningback probably wont do shit, they'll score 21 points"
no word yet on his prediction for UCLA's score, 21 points by UW might be enough to win this one.
I have faith in his predictions after he predicted "Its not gonna fucking rain" during the ASU game.. it didn't rain...much
