Sark defends himself as the play caller
Comments
-
Well good for you. However, my post was about Cream Puff, not Harbaugh.
How many times does one have to recant an error? Right about Stevie...that's all that matters. Relax about the small stuff.
Kim hates IMALOSER and my real identity as well. Calling me one of his minions is laughable. I was banned right after the Holiday Bowl for calling him a douchebag in person. HTH.
-
Steve_Bowman said:
Well good for you. However, my post was about Cream Puff, not Harbaugh.
How many times does one have to recant an error? Right about Stevie...that's all that matters. Relax about the small stuff.
You don't get to recant errors on this site. It is put in someone's signature and it lives forever.
Irregardless, its a mute point. -
What about the times you were right?Steve_Bowman said:Alrighty now. I'm a Loser clearly is one of Grinold's pussy minions. (I can't believe these limp dicks have followed me here.)
Check in later son when you learn a thing or two about football, rather than picking on people for small errors. I was wrong about Harbaugh calling plays.....small detail. So what? -
IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up. -
I know. The point of the post is Cream Puff sucks. He changed the topic to Harbaugh.
Just for the record, if you haven't picked up on it I'm a, Sark hater. In this, Loser is correct.He_Needs_More_Time said:IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up. -
Nice Link as always....... Since I was kicking back in Maui I am pretty sure I didn't give a fuck what you were talking about on dawgshit.com.He_Needs_More_Time said:IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up.
Not sure how winning against a crappy WSU team was going to change the outcome of the LSU, Arizona and Oregon games.
I love how you guys attribute quotes and opinions to other posters that have never been stated. Don't worry your minions will eat it up. -
So now you're just going to flat out lieIMALOSER_ said:
Nice Link as always....... Since I was kicking back in Maui I am pretty sure I didn't give a fuck what you were talking about on dawgshit.com.He_Needs_More_Time said:IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up.
Not sure how winning against a crappy WSU team was going to change the outcome of the LSU, Arizona and Oregon games.
I love how you guys attribute quotes and opinions to other posters that have never been stated. Don't worry your minions will eat it up. -
You were the one that changed to topic of the thread. You took it from Sark is a crappy play caller to..............great coaches don't call their own plays. You should have stuck with sark sucks, instead you tried to extend the argument to other coaches. I just let you know that there are a couple of great coaches that indeed called their own plays. Not sure why you brought up a comparison to great coaches while discussing a coach that can barely win half of his games. I like how it's my fault you fucked up the argument.Steve_Bowman said:I know. The point of the post is Cream Puff sucks. He changed the topic to Harbaugh.
Just for the record, if you haven't picked up on it I'm a, Sark hater. In this, Loser is correct.He_Needs_More_Time said:IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up. -
Please tell me you did it at the Aurora 7-11.IMALOSER_ said:
Kim hates IMALOSER and my real identity as well. Calling me one of his minions is laughable. I was banned right after the Holiday Bowl for calling him a douchebag in person. HTH.Steve_Bowman said:Alrighty now. I'm a Loser clearly is one of Grinold's pussy minions. (I can't believe these limp dicks have followed me here.)
Check in later son when you learn a thing or two about football, rather than picking on people for small errors. I was wrong about Harbaugh calling plays.....small detail. So what?
-
Sorry, Parking lot at Qualcomm/Jack Murphy/Whatever they call it now.Swaye said:
Please tell me you did it at the Aurora 7-11.IMALOSER_ said:
Kim hates IMALOSER and my real identity as well. Calling me one of his minions is laughable. I was banned right after the Holiday Bowl for calling him a douchebag in person. HTH.Steve_Bowman said:Alrighty now. I'm a Loser clearly is one of Grinold's pussy minions. (I can't believe these limp dicks have followed me here.)
Check in later son when you learn a thing or two about football, rather than picking on people for small errors. I was wrong about Harbaugh calling plays.....small detail. So what? -
I remember the "What do you have to say now that we are 9-4 (assumed)?!!" posts. Funny stuff imaloser. Idiot.He_Needs_More_Time said:IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up.
-
Still waiting for the link...................
-
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
-
Over where?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
-
Try fact checker
-
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
-
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl= -
Damn he was pressing badly in there too comparing Sark to James from 1985-1988. Not realizing that James had already accomplished a lot and James felt the heat from himself to make changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl= -
I get his argument about James to a degree. There was a case to be made for firing James in 1988.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Damn he was pressing badly in there too comparing Sark to James from 1985-1988. Not realizing that James had already accomplished a lot and James felt the heat from himself to make changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl=
Where his fucktarded logic falls down is that James proved he could actually win major bowls and pop off. I also enjoyed the copious use of the 0-12 card in his argument there. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
There wasn't any chest thumping about winning 8 or 9 games it was a discussion about Sark's potential record's over a 4 year period. That is why there was a ? put after the totals for 2012.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl=
You fuckers sure are pressing badly.
I still contend that winning 5,7,7,7 after taking over this shit program is no different than James averaging 7 wins over a 4 year span after winning Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl. James had an established elite program, yes that he built, that was performing at the same level the current program is. Never stated Sark was on the same level as a coach. -
And I'll concede that 7 wins is 7 wins, no matter who the coach is.IMALOSER_ said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
There wasn't any chest thumping about winning 8 or 9 games it was a discussion about Sark's potential record's over a 4 year period. That is why there was a ? put after the totals for 2012.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl=
You fuckers sure are pressing badly.
I still contend that winning 5,7,7,7 after taking over this shit program is no different than James averaging 7 wins over a 4 year span after winning Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl. James had an established elite program, yes that he built, that was performing at the same level the current program is. Never stated Sark was on the same level as a coach.
The difference between the guy you always seem to defend even though you never defend him and Coach James is that Coach James actually won instead of popping off all the time. -
He goes or I go.
-
Plus James was 28-17-2 during his WORST four year stretch. Also had a team during same stretch who finished the year ranked 17th/18th.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
And I'll concede that 7 wins is 7 wins, no matter who the coach is.IMALOSER_ said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
There wasn't any chest thumping about winning 8 or 9 games it was a discussion about Sark's potential record's over a 4 year period. That is why there was a ? put after the totals for 2012.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl=
You fuckers sure are pressing badly.
I still contend that winning 5,7,7,7 after taking over this shit program is no different than James averaging 7 wins over a 4 year span after winning Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl. James had an established elite program, yes that he built, that was performing at the same level the current program is. Never stated Sark was on the same level as a coach.
The difference between the guy you always seem to defend even though you never defend him and Coach James is that Coach James actually won instead of popping off all the time.
While Sark is 26-25 with a lot more blowouts and two wins over FBS teams.
James had also shown he is more than capable of leading the Huskies to greatness which he had already done and in the next four years would go 8-4, 10-2, 12-0, 9-3. I have a feeling Sark isn't on the cusp of going on such a run. -
He already killed Dawgbored.RaceBannon said:He goes or I go.
-
He made it a cest pool not Harv. It's one thing to be a doog but he's not even a doog. He is just here to argue and doesn't even believe in any of the shit he says.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He already killed Dawgbored.RaceBannon said:He goes or I go.
-
Have IMALOSER and Myk ever been seen in the same room at the same time?He_Needs_More_Time said:
He made it a cest pool not Harv. It's one thing to be a doog but he's not even a doog. He is just here to argue and doesn't even believe in any of the shit he says.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He already killed Dawgbored.RaceBannon said:He goes or I go.
-
Harv might have made is a cest pool. I made it a cesspool. Dawgboard was dead when Dave made KimmyJ the moderator.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He made it a cest pool not Harv. It's one thing to be a doog but he's not even a doog. He is just here to argue and doesn't even believe in any of the shit he says.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
He already killed Dawgbored.RaceBannon said:He goes or I go.
I've been very clear. I do believe 18% of half the shit I post. So to say I don't believe any of the shit I post is just not true.
Banned from Dawgman, Cougfan, Educk.......... hated on Dawgboard and Hardcorehusky.......I'm starting to believe I have an agenda. -
I like to live a life of abundance.RaceBannon said:He goes
orand I go. -
I'm just kidding. ImaLoser sucks. Time is right. He just tries to argue and will try and find anything to argue about. I don't care if he goes, but he is fucking up the board.
-
Oh, Is Race going take his ball and go home?RaceBannon said:He goes or I go.
Do you remember how to get home? Just push the little emergency button around your neck and someone will come get you.