Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Sark defends himself as the play caller
Comments
-
I remember the "What do you have to say now that we are 9-4 (assumed)?!!" posts. Funny stuff imaloser. Idiot.He_Needs_More_Time said:IMALOSER likes to point out small little insignificant details you make a mistake on.
However, completely ignores the fact he was talking shit after the Colorado win that UW was 9-4 team and all us Sark "haters" were going to have to eat crow about seven win Steve.
He conveniently dodges that topic when it is brought up.
-
Still waiting for the link...................
-
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
-
Over where?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
-
Try fact checker
-
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
-
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl= -
Damn he was pressing badly in there too comparing Sark to James from 1985-1988. Not realizing that James had already accomplished a lot and James felt the heat from himself to make changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl= -
I get his argument about James to a degree. There was a case to be made for firing James in 1988.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Damn he was pressing badly in there too comparing Sark to James from 1985-1988. Not realizing that James had already accomplished a lot and James felt the heat from himself to make changes.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl=
Where his fucktarded logic falls down is that James proved he could actually win major bowls and pop off. I also enjoyed the copious use of the 0-12 card in his argument there. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
In IMALOSER's defense, I couldn't find a link over there. It looked like IMALOSER went off the grid in November.IMALOSER_ said:Still waiting for the link...................
There wasn't any chest thumping about winning 8 or 9 games it was a discussion about Sark's potential record's over a 4 year period. That is why there was a ? put after the totals for 2012.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
FactChecker101 was created on November 30. I can't imagine why a handle switch was necessary...He_Needs_More_Time said:
Yea I don't think he posted it under his IMALOSER name but under his "Fact Checker" name.RaceBannon said:Try fact checker
Here's the funny thread were IMALOSER assumed 8 or 9 wins, including 6 in conference:
http://forum.dawgboard.com/index.php?showtopic=1047&hl=
You fuckers sure are pressing badly.
I still contend that winning 5,7,7,7 after taking over this shit program is no different than James averaging 7 wins over a 4 year span after winning Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl. James had an established elite program, yes that he built, that was performing at the same level the current program is. Never stated Sark was on the same level as a coach.

