Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Sark defends himself as the play caller

jecornel
jecornel Member Posts: 9,737
On with Elise and the Brewery last week Sark clearly points out the benefits ofbeing the head coach and the play caller.

He goes on to talk about how he can get a feel for the tempo of the game and if the defense iso on the field too much he can dial up more runs. So he that can control the game.

So an offensive coordinator who is calling the game can't get a feel for the game because he isn't the head coach? You have to really wonder this guys head is at? If you listen to Sark he really says some of the most bizarre shit.

Dialing up more runs? What a novel idea.
«134567

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    It's part of his politician act. He's just speaks in circles without actually making any sense. Skirt around the issue with some bullshit, than move on to the next topic. If the interviewers were any good, they would ask a follow up about why an OC couldn't get a feel for the game. Of course, the pussies at KJR will never do that.

    I don't have a problem with the head coach calling plays. Some head coaches are so good at calling plays that it would be idiotic to not have them call plays (ex: Urban Meyer, Chip). Sark is not one of those guys.

    Sark has always reminded me of a politician with his speeches and never backing it up.

    Of course our pussy media who is more worried about access than doing their fucking job will never ask tough schedules and especially won't ask tough follow up questions.

    I personally think a HC calling the plays on either side of the ball is a bad thing. I think you are too busy focusing on one side of the ball that other details tend to get overlooked.

    I'd rather Sark have input on the offense and make the tough decisions(to kick, to go for it, etc) than have his head buried in his play sheet and missing the details of the game.

    I look at Saban who is a defensive genius and he doesn't even call his own plays. He lets his coaches develop as coaches while also managing all aspects of his program.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    They almost were 9-4.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,408 Founders Club
    So that means Sanky will be second in carries instead of third?
  • IrishDawg22
    IrishDawg22 Member Posts: 2,754
    He may want to watch the AC & the Vegas Bowl before his next appearance.
  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    So that means Sanky will be second in carries instead of third?

    On the team or the Pac-12? Getting kind of vague with your use of Statistics. What did they do in 2009?
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Just sit Sark down in his fancy new office and show him the Oregon State game from last year, 2012. It was the worst series of playcalls I've EVER seen. I've brought it up many times, and should have cost the dawgs the game. I wish it did, maybe then we would have fired the dipshitstick.

    I lost faith in Sark completely then as an OC. But have many times prior. he talks about rhythm in play-calling. he has none really, he's like a guy with two left feet, or two left hands. Zero run-to-pass rhythm. He panics, thus makes bad decisions.

    I'm adamant about this, if Sark gives up play calling he could win the Pac 12 north next year. . If he doesn't we will never get past 9-4

  • IMALOSER_
    IMALOSER_ Member Posts: 158

    Just sit Sark down in his fancy new office and show him the Oregon State game from last year, 2012. It was the worst series of playcalls I've EVER seen. I've brought it up many times, and should have cost the dawgs the game. I wish it did, maybe then we would have fired the dipshitstick.

    I lost faith in Sark completely then as an OC. But have many times prior. he talks about rhythm in play-calling. he has none really, he's like a guy with two left feet, or two left hands. Zero run-to-pass rhythm. He panics, thus makes bad decisions.

    I'm adamant about this, if Sark gives up play calling he could win the Pac 12 north next year. . If he doesn't we will never get past 9-4

    You lost faith after last years OSU game? Fuck, even I lost faith a year earlier than that when he waited to play an "injured" Keith Price until the game was out of hand.

    By far his biggest f-up to date. Playing Montana on the road, when Price was good to go.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Just sit Sark down in his fancy new office and show him the Oregon State game from last year, 2012. It was the worst series of playcalls I've EVER seen. I've brought it up many times, and should have cost the dawgs the game. I wish it did, maybe then we would have fired the dipshitstick.

    I lost faith in Sark completely then as an OC. But have many times prior. he talks about rhythm in play-calling. he has none really, he's like a guy with two left feet, or two left hands. Zero run-to-pass rhythm. He panics, thus makes bad decisions.

    I'm adamant about this, if Sark gives up play calling he could win the Pac 12 north next year. . If he doesn't we will never get past 9-4

    I had always believed in Sark until the Oregon.......State game.

    Just doesn't have the same ring to it.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,373 Standard Supporter
    edited August 2013
    The very first time I questioned Sark was when we lost 41-0 to Stanford in 2010. That was a pathetic showing, and I thought something was wrong to lose like that. He ended up redeeming that loss by winning 4 straight to close the year. I know Nebraska didn't want to be there, but I loved the physical football we played in that game on both sides of the ball. I actually thought Sark had learned.

    When the defense sucked early in 2011, I was worried. By the Oregon State game I had serious doubts, and after the Baylor game I wanted Sark (not just Holt) gone. He was running a pussy program that was drastically worse than the team that beat Nebraska.

    The doog in me got excited for 2012. I thought it we improved on defense (which we did), we might have a good season. I never dreamed Sark could fuck it up as badly as he did. The LSU game was the final straw for me when I realized that Sark would never be able to get it done. The record hasn't been good enough, but it goes well beyond the record. The soft play, undisciplined team, recruiting misses, shifting the blame elsewhere. I'm fucking tired of it, and we need to get a real fucking coach. What's the point of keeping a coach that is average and commonly is out coached?