Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fire Petersen

CuntWaffle
CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
Seriously some of you need to shut the fuck up. We aren't on Oregons level yet. I fell for the trap too... Deal with it. In 2 years we will be one of the top programs in the pax 12.

Yes I'm drunk and have done a few lines. FYFMFE.
«13

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited October 2014
    Petersen just needs more time to get his guys in there.
    I'm still for Petersen, but I'm not gonna make excuses for him that I didn't make for sark
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,135
    dhdawg said:

    Petersen just needs more time to get his guys in there.
    I'm still for Petersen, but I'm not gonna make excuses for him that I didn't make for sark

    This. Sark wasn't out there fumbling, throwing interceptions, missing tackles, making dumb penalties. Remember dumb fucks saying that? I get it. Oregon is better. 42-13 is fucking horrible. The coach deserves some blame for that.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    Peterman owns this fucking dumpster fire. 100%
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,135
    edited October 2014

    Petermen picked the wrong fucking quarterback

    Maybe, but his defense got destroyed all game, his playcalling with no QB runs sucks, and his team is still mentally weak. He's picked 2 wrong QB's if Williams is actually the guy. Peterman gets time, but spades are spades.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

    Petermen picked the wrong fucking quarterback

    Maybe, but his defense got destroyed all game, his playcalling with no QB runs sucks, and his team is still mentally weak. He's picked 2 wrong QB's if Williams is actually the guy. Peterman gets time, but spades are spades.
    Always about the blacks with you
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

    This was not Petermen's finest hour. A complete dumpster fire in game 7 is not acceptable

    Stanford play calling, now this ... along with the struggles against Hawaii and EWU ...

    Maybe he is in a little in over his head during year one in the big leagues.
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    edited October 2014
    Sark won 5 games his first year but it felt more like 7.

    Peterman has won 5 games but, when you consider the way he won those... he's gonna need to win 8 games this year in order for this season to feel like the 7 wins Sark won in his first year.

    So, unless Peterman wins 9 this season, we will have taken a big step back this year and I'm hearing that isn't sitting well with some folks who laid a lot on the line with this Peterman gamble.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    It's Division-1 Football!!!!
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    Sark won 5 games his first year but it felt more like 7.

    Peterman has won 5 games but, when you consider the way he won those... he's gonna need to win 8 games this year in order for this season to feel like the 7 wins Stark won in his first year.

    So, unless Peterman wins 9 this season, we will have taken a big step back this year and I'm hearing that isn't sitting well with some folks who laid a lot on the line with this Peterman gamble.

    9 wins is the minimum expectation for sure
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
  • SevenEleven
    SevenEleven Member Posts: 318
    Peterman eats pieces of shit like you for breakfast
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    topdawgnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
    Awesome, he took over the program already on top of a conference where they only had to beat a tuff Fresno State to win it every year.

    Rich Rod is proven in the big leagues. Peterman got a team up once or twice a year. Snore.

    When he beats a good team in the weekly grind of big boy football we'll talk.

  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited October 2014
    Canard said:

    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.

    So W/L is all that matters….Petersen has the highest career winning percentage in CFB.

    A three game schedule? Thats why the metrics matter. They adjust for that shit. They distinguish Boise St under Petersen from teams like Northern Illinois and Louisville. And they also distinguish Boise under Petersen from the other coaches at Boise. Petersen btw had a great record against top 25 teams.

    You're all over the place.
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    Mosster47 said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
    Awesome, he took over the program already on top of a conference where they only had to beat a tuff Fresno State to win it every year.

    Rich Rod is proven in the big leagues. Peterman got a team up once or twice a year. Snore.

    When he beats a good team in the weekly grind of big boy football we'll talk.

    You just don't get it.
  • pawz
    pawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,462 Founders Club
    Canard said:

    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.

    But Helfrich ...
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504

    Canard said:

    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.

    So W/L is all that matters….Petersen has the highest career winning percentage in CFB.

    A three game schedule? Thats why the metrics matter. They adjust for that shit. They distinguish Boise St under Petersen from teams like Northern Illinois and Louisville. And they also distinguish Boise under Petersen from the other coaches at Boise. Petersen btw had a great record against top 25 teams.

    You're all over the place.
    I am not all over the place. You want adjustments to reality. Reality, and history, says Peterman ain't all that.

    The fucking WAC, MW, whatever vagabond itinerant bullshit Spud St. calls its conference, it ain't "college football" as we know it in the PAC-8-10-12.

    You wanna suck cock on mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists, that's your business.

    The eyeball test says the 2014 UW Huskies are not well coached at all. Seven-ish out there tonight, but Chip Kelly was 3k miles away.
  • blackmamba
    blackmamba Member Posts: 184
    UW offense resembles pee wee football highlight reel.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,135

    UW offense resembles pee wee football highlight reel.

    Pee wee football highlights often consist of RB's taking pitches down the sideline to the house. That hasn't happened once this season for UW.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    Mosster47 said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
    Awesome, he took over the program already on top of a conference where they only had to beat a tuff Fresno State to win it every year.

    Rich Rod is proven in the big leagues. Peterman got a team up once or twice a year. Snore.

    When he beats a good team in the weekly grind of big boy football we'll talk.

    Proven in the Big Leagues?

    Fucking Big East King

    And fell flat on his face at Michigan.

    Let's see if he can get over 8-5 at Zona before we crown him the next Chip Kelly.
  • Canard
    Canard Member Posts: 504
    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.
  • Dennis_DeYoung
    Dennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    @Canard‌ isn't funny. That's the problem. If you are here trolling (which is fine) you should clearly be funny. Canard does not meet that bar.