Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Fire Petersen

24

Comments

  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    topdawgnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
    Awesome, he took over the program already on top of a conference where they only had to beat a tuff Fresno State to win it every year.

    Rich Rod is proven in the big leagues. Peterman got a team up once or twice a year. Snore.

    When he beats a good team in the weekly grind of big boy football we'll talk.

  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    edited October 2014
    Canard said:

    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.

    So W/L is all that matters….Petersen has the highest career winning percentage in CFB.

    A three game schedule? Thats why the metrics matter. They adjust for that shit. They distinguish Boise St under Petersen from teams like Northern Illinois and Louisville. And they also distinguish Boise under Petersen from the other coaches at Boise. Petersen btw had a great record against top 25 teams.

    You're all over the place.
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    Mosster47 said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
    Awesome, he took over the program already on top of a conference where they only had to beat a tuff Fresno State to win it every year.

    Rich Rod is proven in the big leagues. Peterman got a team up once or twice a year. Snore.

    When he beats a good team in the weekly grind of big boy football we'll talk.

    You just don't get it.
  • pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 19,901 Founders Club
    Canard said:

    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.

    But Helfrich ...
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504

    Canard said:

    Lulz. Every post I have made since adopting this handle in 1998 has been angry or sarcastic. You must be slow or something.

    It doesn't matter what weasel ass baseball style metric you want to "adjust" with. The stark reality is that these contests ain't fucking fantasy football. The only stat that matters is W-L.

    Peterman doesn't get to build a three fucking game schedule and drop one half the time anymore. That team out there was no better coached than a Sark squad.

    And that's your secret fear right there.

    So W/L is all that matters….Petersen has the highest career winning percentage in CFB.

    A three game schedule? Thats why the metrics matter. They adjust for that shit. They distinguish Boise St under Petersen from teams like Northern Illinois and Louisville. And they also distinguish Boise under Petersen from the other coaches at Boise. Petersen btw had a great record against top 25 teams.

    You're all over the place.
    I am not all over the place. You want adjustments to reality. Reality, and history, says Peterman ain't all that.

    The fucking WAC, MW, whatever vagabond itinerant bullshit Spud St. calls its conference, it ain't "college football" as we know it in the PAC-8-10-12.

    You wanna suck cock on mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists, that's your business.

    The eyeball test says the 2014 UW Huskies are not well coached at all. Seven-ish out there tonight, but Chip Kelly was 3k miles away.
  • blackmambablackmamba Member Posts: 184
    UW offense resembles pee wee football highlight reel.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    UW offense resembles pee wee football highlight reel.

    Pee wee football highlights often consist of RB's taking pitches down the sideline to the house. That hasn't happened once this season for UW.
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838
    Mosster47 said:

    topdawgnc said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Canard said:

    No former Boise St. HC has done jack shit at the big boy level weekly grind. Dirk Koetter is your fucking gold standard on this topic.

    Thats embarrasing.

    Over his 8 years at Boise Petersen had the 11th best team according to SRS which adjusts for SOS and margin of victory. He did this with 4 4* recruits. None of the other Boise coaches had this stellar of a track record.

    UW has a championship coach and the best coach in the conference. And he'll be at UW for 10+ years. Gloat about one fucking game but the UW program is in excellent hands and will compete for championships in the coming years. Meanwhile, Oregon has peaked. You obviously know it and thats why there is such anger in your posts.
    Rich Rod is the best coach in the conference. Peterman left Boise when he saw he let the wheels get loose. When things were good he wouldn't even consider leaving.
    You have to be kidding?

    92-12

    Bored.
    Awesome, he took over the program already on top of a conference where they only had to beat a tuff Fresno State to win it every year.

    Rich Rod is proven in the big leagues. Peterman got a team up once or twice a year. Snore.

    When he beats a good team in the weekly grind of big boy football we'll talk.

    Proven in the Big Leagues?

    Fucking Big East King

    And fell flat on his face at Michigan.

    Let's see if he can get over 8-5 at Zona before we crown him the next Chip Kelly.
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.
  • Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    @Canard‌ isn't funny. That's the problem. If you are here trolling (which is fine) you should clearly be funny. Canard does not meet that bar.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,473 Founders Club
    Canard said:

    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.

    Yeah 7 games in

    KenND thinks you're pressing
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 29,696 Founders Club

    @Canard‌ isn't funny. That's the problem. If you are here trolling (which is fine) you should clearly be funny. Canard does not meet that bar.

    He's a bitter old man. He has always acted butthurt on the message boards. I'm sure he's a pleasant guy to deal with on a daily basis.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    Canard said:

    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.

    Now, more than ever before

    image

  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504

    @Canard‌ isn't funny. That's the problem. If you are here trolling (which is fine) you should clearly be funny. Canard does not meet that bar.

    Hate Week has only been funny when it comes to prediction Friday, or Wednesday, for the last decade plus.
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504

    Canard said:

    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.

    Yeah 7 games in

    KenND thinks you're pressing
    I'm pressing? You have multiple clowns here calling the Spudster "the best HC in the conference." Based on his stellar performance at the JC level no doubt.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 104,473 Founders Club
    Canard said:

    Canard said:

    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.

    Yeah 7 games in

    KenND thinks you're pressing
    I'm pressing? You have multiple clowns here calling the Spudster "the best HC in the conference." Based on his stellar performance at the JC level no doubt.
    Look you guys got Helfrich, this win tonight gets him an extension and a raise so Michigan or Florida or the NFL don't steal him. Be happy bro
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    Canard said:

    Canard said:

    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.

    Yeah 7 games in

    KenND thinks you're pressing
    I'm pressing? You have multiple clowns here calling the Spudster "the best HC in the conference." Based on his stellar performance at the JC level no doubt.
    So he coached a JC team to a 2-0 record over Oregon?

    The answer to your querey is fuck yes, something awful.

  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    Hey, I'm just enjoying the local erection of the coaching mythology built around Peterman.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    Canard said:

    Hey, I'm just enjoying the local erection of the coaching mythology built around Peterman.

    image

  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    dnc said:

    Canard said:

    Canard said:

    Lol. You guys obviously have a double standard hard on for Peterman. He hasn't proven shit in a big boy conference at all.

    Yeah 7 games in

    KenND thinks you're pressing
    I'm pressing? You have multiple clowns here calling the Spudster "the best HC in the conference." Based on his stellar performance at the JC level no doubt.
    So he coached a JC team to a 2-0 record over Oregon?

    The answer to your querey is fuck yes, something awful.

    That was all Wilcox.
Sign In or Register to comment.