Freshmen OL bring impressive size boost to Washington's front
Comments
-
They average 340 lbs across the line.
Time to edit 5 Reasons.
-
I feel like the times we have touted having yuuuuuge OLs they haven't been able to move and we have sucked. The early-2000s version my dad referred to as the Circus Elephants. Not saying it won't work, but certainly feels like a lazy metric.
-
Yep. Also, Lake was big on being “big,” and being “a pro.”
Just look for the pencil arms though. Do they have Ryan Tolar arms?? -
If they move like pre-injury Trey Adams and also Kaleb McGary, then I'm good with it.
-
The '85 and '86 Huskies had highly-touted huge offensive lines… but they ended up being too slow
-
I get it. You want guys who are big but also are athletes and play other sports like basketball. From what I remember though Adams and McGary were guys who came in like 270ish types and added 30 pounds. Seems now like we're going after guys who come in 340 and will want to drop. I trust the staff. Jimmy was just a GOAT level bozo who seemed to just think a bigger weight on the roster automatically meant better.
-
After going after the portal and going hard to development our high school class over the last 2 off-seasons, to the point where the staff is like "No, we feel good about this room we are not going after any more guys so as to possibly slow the development of our core" someone here actually said with a straight face that we would be lucky to have an OL that is average and/or an improvement over last year's 😆
-
The guys that are touted at 340 are also 6’5- 6’8. If we had a bunch of 6’ 340lb sumo’s I’d be rather concerned
-
It goes without saying. I know that there's some former Sark guys but this isn't Sark's staff. Sark has a Sumlin like flameout at Arizona (cook it), not be the 2nd-3rd best team in a loaded conference year and then go win 10 games and beat Oklahoma. Holy fuckall.
-
I truss the staff. Seems like we're seeing more Fautanu 6'4 types at tackle, but I have a hard spot for the 6'7-8 guys.
