This take is so littered with hypocrisy and willful blindness I don't even know where to begin. Trump is not "my guy" but like everything in two-party politics, I side with the lesser of two evils. The wrongdoings of the Dems over the last 4-12 years is well documented here, but what is truly unforgivable was how anti-American all of it was: letting soldiers die in Afghanistan, suppressing free speech brazenly, coercing people to take a vaccine, lying about the economy, etc., etc. Please don't be pedantic like H and hide behind binary thinking. It's simplistic and embarrassing.
No one here thinks that Trump is without his warts, but he has his strengths. He's a confident leader who understands that the weight of the US at his back self-fulfills a majority of his prophecies despite all of the whining from both the left and socialists worldwide who have been suckling at Democratic teat for decades. Also, if you haven't noticed, Trumps playbook is simple: (1) say something outrageous, (2) wait for people to panic, (3) wait for people to come up with a compromise, (4) accept compromise without having lifted a finger. Gaza, Greenland, Venezuela, and soon enough, tariffs and Ukraine. Rinse, lather, repeat. All have worked out for him or are trending that direction. Next will be eggs and interest rates, and you'll have nothing to complain about except for putting trannies in bathrooms and women's sports.
Whatever your stance, if you think the legal case in NY was legitimate, you don't actually understand the law. I can speak on this issue from a position of expertise, and unless you're either a NY prosecutor or a constitutional law professor, you should probably just shut the fuck up and sit down. There was zero precedent for the charges, no actual harm done, and the supposed victim came to the defense of the "perpetrator" - which I've been told isn't usually something you see in the pursuit of justice. Keep carrying that water, you'll need it to slake your thirst from shouting into the wind so much.
As for Tate, I've said it before, he's unequivocally a shitty person, but it's apparent that a lot of the supposed evils he's committed have been either exaggerated or fabricated altogether. That doesn't mean he's a good person, just not the axis of evil you seem to suggest. After all, it's not like he showers with his daughter or approves drone strikes on Syrian children (oops!). Now THOSE are forgivable misdeeds. In any case, I would agree that he doesn't belong at the white house regardless of what he has or hasn't done.
@Sources I got plenty. Your post was just “yeah they suck, buuuttt”. Just be honest and admit you’re willing to excuse them because they say things you like.
Comments
I think you’re using an autopen at this point, with the way you keep posting the same shit. Might as well declare it all null and void.
I’m answering your stupidity in another thread but you just ignore it.
This take is so littered with hypocrisy and willful blindness I don't even know where to begin. Trump is not "my guy" but like everything in two-party politics, I side with the lesser of two evils. The wrongdoings of the Dems over the last 4-12 years is well documented here, but what is truly unforgivable was how anti-American all of it was: letting soldiers die in Afghanistan, suppressing free speech brazenly, coercing people to take a vaccine, lying about the economy, etc., etc. Please don't be pedantic like H and hide behind binary thinking. It's simplistic and embarrassing.
No one here thinks that Trump is without his warts, but he has his strengths. He's a confident leader who understands that the weight of the US at his back self-fulfills a majority of his prophecies despite all of the whining from both the left and socialists worldwide who have been suckling at Democratic teat for decades. Also, if you haven't noticed, Trumps playbook is simple: (1) say something outrageous, (2) wait for people to panic, (3) wait for people to come up with a compromise, (4) accept compromise without having lifted a finger. Gaza, Greenland, Venezuela, and soon enough, tariffs and Ukraine. Rinse, lather, repeat. All have worked out for him or are trending that direction. Next will be eggs and interest rates, and you'll have nothing to complain about except for putting trannies in bathrooms and women's sports.
Whatever your stance, if you think the legal case in NY was legitimate, you don't actually understand the law. I can speak on this issue from a position of expertise, and unless you're either a NY prosecutor or a constitutional law professor, you should probably just shut the fuck up and sit down. There was zero precedent for the charges, no actual harm done, and the supposed victim came to the defense of the "perpetrator" - which I've been told isn't usually something you see in the pursuit of justice. Keep carrying that water, you'll need it to slake your thirst from shouting into the wind so much.
As for Tate, I've said it before, he's unequivocally a shitty person, but it's apparent that a lot of the supposed evils he's committed have been either exaggerated or fabricated altogether. That doesn't mean he's a good person, just not the axis of evil you seem to suggest. After all, it's not like he showers with his daughter or approves drone strikes on Syrian children (oops!). Now THOSE are forgivable misdeeds. In any case, I would agree that he doesn't belong at the white house regardless of what he has or hasn't done.
the only thing that’s apparent is that you broke your back from all the gymnastics you just attempted.
So you’ve got nothing but hyperbole. Okay!
@Sources I got plenty. Your post was just “yeah they suck, buuuttt”. Just be honest and admit you’re willing to excuse them because they say things you like.