🚨BREAKING: Conor McGregor erupts on the White House podium
Comments
-
No community note yet
-
Yeah but a guy whose career is built on violence has a few assault convictions and a dubious “rape” civil judgment against him that is shaky at best.
-
@Sources lol it’s only horseshit because he’s your guy. The sooner you admit it the better. If he was out there advocating DEI you’d be screaming.
the entire process of your belief is predicated on the fact that you will defend to the death anyone whose views line up with yours, no matter how rancid of a person they are. If you want to die on the hill of the Tates and this washed up clown who still needs attention because he’s bored and has nothing better to do these days, it’s a free country. Just don’t act like you’re on a pedestal. -
Us older guys fought all the time as kids. It's what we did. Often becoming friends after. It's how boys tested themselves. No one was ever seriously injured. Bloody lip, black eyes, bruises. Usually no teeth knocked out although my knuckles were scared from teeth for a very long time. We learned to stand up for ourselves and not take shit from random people. We didn't use weapons. We were better off for it and people learned to respect one another because insults could result in an ass kicking.
No such mechanism for learning exists now.
-
I do, and have. You ignore it because it’s inconvenient (or in @Sledog’s case, because he can’t read), and it’s far easier to just stick to your tired same old lines you girls spit ad nauseum anytime someone disagrees with Trump. All because you’re not clever enough to come up with better comebacks.
-
SoccerDork’s favorite sport is largely based on faking injuries to draw penalties from the opposing players.
Soccer, girly and soft in the USA since Cosmos had old Pelé limping around in the NASL days and a handful of people that were born in the USA finally paid it some attention.
-
lol, and right on cue Chrissy with the same old shit.
should call you Spider from Goodfellas with how much you like to dance for me.
-
I noticed you ignored the Biden question.
-
I can read just fine. You just can't comprehend what you read. Imagine an Irish fighter gets in fights.
-
Me pointing out you’re a hysterical soccer dork who posts emotional screeds when your anger bubbles over is a dance for you?
OK then. Glad I can help.
-
I think you’re using an autopen at this point, with the way you keep posting the same shit. Might as well declare it all null and void.
-
I’m answering your stupidity in another thread but you just ignore it.
-
This take is so littered with hypocrisy and willful blindness I don't even know where to begin. Trump is not "my guy" but like everything in two-party politics, I side with the lesser of two evils. The wrongdoings of the Dems over the last 4-12 years is well documented here, but what is truly unforgivable was how anti-American all of it was: letting soldiers die in Afghanistan, suppressing free speech brazenly, coercing people to take a vaccine, lying about the economy, etc., etc. Please don't be pedantic like H and hide behind binary thinking. It's simplistic and embarrassing.
No one here thinks that Trump is without his warts, but he has his strengths. He's a confident leader who understands that the weight of the US at his back self-fulfills a majority of his prophecies despite all of the whining from both the left and socialists worldwide who have been suckling at Democratic teat for decades. Also, if you haven't noticed, Trumps playbook is simple: (1) say something outrageous, (2) wait for people to panic, (3) wait for people to come up with a compromise, (4) accept compromise without having lifted a finger. Gaza, Greenland, Venezuela, and soon enough, tariffs and Ukraine. Rinse, lather, repeat. All have worked out for him or are trending that direction. Next will be eggs and interest rates, and you'll have nothing to complain about except for putting trannies in bathrooms and women's sports.
Whatever your stance, if you think the legal case in NY was legitimate, you don't actually understand the law. I can speak on this issue from a position of expertise, and unless you're either a NY prosecutor or a constitutional law professor, you should probably just shut the fuck up and sit down. There was zero precedent for the charges, no actual harm done, and the supposed victim came to the defense of the "perpetrator" - which I've been told isn't usually something you see in the pursuit of justice. Keep carrying that water, you'll need it to slake your thirst from shouting into the wind so much.
As for Tate, I've said it before, he's unequivocally a shitty person, but it's apparent that a lot of the supposed evils he's committed have been either exaggerated or fabricated altogether. That doesn't mean he's a good person, just not the axis of evil you seem to suggest. After all, it's not like he showers with his daughter or approves drone strikes on Syrian children (oops!). Now THOSE are forgivable misdeeds. In any case, I would agree that he doesn't belong at the white house regardless of what he has or hasn't done.
-
the only thing that’s apparent is that you broke your back from all the gymnastics you just attempted.
-
So you’ve got nothing but hyperbole. Okay!
-
@Sources I got plenty. Your post was just “yeah they suck, buuuttt”. Just be honest and admit you’re willing to excuse them because they say things you like.
