I’ll add attempt to remove qualified political opponents from ballots as another threat to Democracy the Dems tried. @CallMeBigErn still avoids answering how doing this and limiting voting options protects democracy.
Oh really, Dipshit? The 14th being a congressional removal clause, and not the states, for federal office candidates is only the primary basis for their ruling. States can’t remove via the 14th. 9-0, game was a blowout. Even the dunce who do t know what a woman is agreed.
Dumber than anyone else here.
—
"Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse," the court decision concluded.
The ruling made clear that lawmakers after the Civil War intended the 14th Amendment to expand federal power, at the expense of the states, and that the Constitution "empowers Congress" to determine how to use the "severe" penalty of disqualification.
Comments
"So now if you want protected borders you are labelled a "neo-isolationist"?"-Atl
"What war in Europe?" queried Atl.
He'll lose the popular vote again.
Like Hitler.
Tell us about the war in Europe
I’ll add attempt to remove qualified political opponents from ballots as another threat to Democracy the Dems tried. @CallMeBigErn still avoids answering how doing this and limiting voting options protects democracy.
What 14th Amendment?
The one that SCOTUS said 9-0 doesn’t apply.
Keep protecting Democracy by limiting options for voters though, Fascist.
Maybe H and the rest of the Democracy Defenders can add 10 new Justice positions to SCOTUS to get rulings that protect our sacred vote.
CNN is trying to prepare you as am I
And more nonsensical rhetoric from a guy who can't back up his bullshit.
Again, just pathetic hh.
That wasn't the Court's holding, moron.
What war in Europe?
War in Europe is nonsense! obviously
The real democracy defenders heard from:
What war in Europe?
Canceling elections to save democracy
That wasn't the Court's holding, moron.
———--@HHusky
Oh really, Dipshit? The 14th being a congressional removal clause, and not the states, for federal office candidates is only the primary basis for their ruling. States can’t remove via the 14th. 9-0, game was a blowout. Even the dunce who do t know what a woman is agreed.
Dumber than anyone else here.
—"Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse," the court decision concluded.
The ruling made clear that lawmakers after the Civil War intended the 14th Amendment to expand federal power, at the expense of the states, and that the Constitution "empowers Congress" to determine how to use the "severe" penalty of disqualification.
So I was right, and you were wrong . . . again.
So I was right, and you were wrong . . . again.
White flag from the Lightweight. So fucking dumb.
14th Amendment!! LOL
"14th Amendment doesn't apply" was your claim.
Holding was how the 14th Amendment applies.
Keep your day job.
14th Amendment doesn’t apply to states removing candidates for federal office, as ruled 9-0 by SCOTUS, and s I excerpted.
Shall I type it slower for you? Your evasiveness doesn’t fool me, dummy.
Trying to save face, Chrissy?