I would be willing to bet Petersen talked about the process at Boise State too. It's a certainty that he wonders what the fuck the players were doing under Sark, but I think some of you are misinterpreting what he means by the process. I don't think he's trying to lower expectations or using it as a way of saying he has to rebuild the program. Petersen always talks about striving to get better. From my viewpoint, that is what he means by the process.
It's always a process, you're always trying to improve, or you're regressing. He treats his team and players like he wants them to treat life. Christ, there's nothing to fucking analyze here. Beat fucking Cal. Win the dreckfest North. Nothing has changed.
It's always a process, you're always trying to improve, or you're regressing. He treats his team and players like he wants them to treat life. Christ, there's nothing to fucking analyze here. Beat fucking Cal. Win the dreckfest North. Nothing has changed.
Lots might change after the boors bring out the plunger on Saturday
that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.
Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).
I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"
Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.
Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).
I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"
Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
That is epic pressing. All I've heard all week is Leach and Halladay make excuses for Wazzu embarrassing themselves at home. Mora throws his kicker under the bus. Frost comes out and immediately and tells a beatwriter that Mariota is hurt, yet he's willing to put him out at fucking receiver on a play against an unranked team at home.
And Petersen takes 100% of the blame for a fake-punt.
And there are some dumb fucks who publically wonder why Petersen needs to burn it down and start over. The house was full of toxic mold.
Sometimes when you buy a house where meth was manufactured, it's best to demo it down to the foundation and start over.
I'm not saying Sark is Heisenberg so don't go twisting. If I had to relate him to anyone on that show, it would probably be Badger.
I'd go with Pinkman, highschool drop out used by the mastermind to help relate to the market. Thinks he's a 50/50 partner and that what he brings to the table adds value, when really he's a huge liability the mastermind has to work around to accomplish anything.
that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.
Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).
I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"
Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
No one is gonna give him 5 years to rebuild. We aren't WSU
Peterton can talk about his process all he wants, but that process better fucking process itself into existence quickly.
This. There's no reason for expectations to be changed. No one is expecting 11-2 or something crazy. But I'm not going to accept 7-8 wins for the next 2 years, even though next year looks to be a rebuilding year
Comments
I hope his process is better than the one Dan Hawkins used.
*obligatory*
SadTrombone.com
And Petersen takes 100% of the blame for a fake-punt.
We aren't WSU This. There's no reason for expectations to be changed. No one is expecting 11-2 or something crazy. But I'm not going to accept 7-8 wins for the next 2 years, even though next year looks to be a rebuilding year