Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Peterman repeating the phrase "this is a process.." in every interview tells me

12346»

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    RoadDawg55 said:

    I think we have about 3 running plays. Inside zone, outside zone, and I saw a pitch once against Stanford. I haven't seen a QB sweep with lead blockers. No Gilby shovel passes. No option. Very few fly sweeps.

    Part of the reason is probably because Petersen has placed a premium on ball security. He's also big on fundamentals and may not want to do that stuff until they prefect the simple stuff. We are purposely somewhat conservative, but the offense has been bland. I'm not saying get cute like Sark, but mix in some things to keep the defense off balance. The passing game isn't getting it done and the RB's at this point have been mediocre. Hopefully we open it up a little bit, especially in the run game because that needs to be the strength of this offense. The concerning thing is Petersen said they actually need to dial it back with installing the playbook.

    They ran triple-option at least once against Stanford. Myliey kept it and converted on 3rd down.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Homebrew_Dawg
    Homebrew_Dawg Member Posts: 1,652
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    With this schedule, if this team ends up at 7-6 and in the Humanitarian Bowl or whatever, then it is a poor job by Petersen no matter how you slice it.

    No reason to expect going backwards from 5-4 in conference.
    Your best effort.
    Shortest. Hallelujah!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    beelzebub said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.

    Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).

    I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"

    Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
    If we're bashing Scientology, I'm OUT
    But why is L Ron Hubbard a bad inventor of science fiction based religions?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter