Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Peterman repeating the phrase "this is a process.." in every interview tells me

that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.

Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).

I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"
«1

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    On the other hand, process is the new 0-12/sanctions.

    Win or get the fuck out.

    18 games
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    On the other hand, process is the new 0-12/sanctions.

    Win or get the fuck out.

    18 games
    18 REAL games or 10 games plus 8 exhibitions?
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098

    With this schedule, if this team ends up at 7-6 and in the Humanitarian Bowl or whatever, then it is a poor job by Petersen no matter how you slice it.

    No reason to expect going backwards from 5-4 in conference.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Tequilla said:

    With this schedule, if this team ends up at 7-6 and in the Humanitarian Bowl or whatever, then it is a poor job by Petersen no matter how you slice it.

    No reason to expect going backwards from 5-4 in conference.
    Your best effort.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,592 Standard Supporter

    On the other hand, process is the new 0-12/sanctions.

    Win or get the fuck out.

    Yeah, I'm just out of patience and I have been for about 12 years. 4-1 is fine but there's no reason they should regress. He needs to lay down the law and I understand that, but I don't think this team is quite the horrible dumpster fire in terms of fundamentals as some make it out to be. That was Ty.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    On the other hand, process is the new 0-12/sanctions.

    Win or get the fuck out.

    Yeah, I'm just out of patience and I have been for about 12 years. 4-1 is fine but there's no reason they should regress. He needs to lay down the law and I understand that, but I don't think this team is quite the horrible dumpster fire in terms of fundamentals as some make it out to be. That was Gilby/Ty/Sark.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    On the other hand, process is the new 0-12/sanctions.

    Win or get the fuck out.

    18 games
    18 REAL games or 10 games plus 8 exhibitions?
    18 games. Period.
  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361

    that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.

    Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).

    I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"

    Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,160
    beelzebub said:

    that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.

    Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).

    I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"

    Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
    60-59
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680


    beelzebub said:

    that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.

    Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).

    I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"

    Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
    60-59
    Irony detector exploded.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,725 Founders Club
    edited October 2014


    Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.


    That was actually good
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680


    beelzebub said:

    that no one knows the damage Sark did to the program.

    Doogs, of course, will have no patience because Steve left Pete with a "9-win team and a full copboard of great recruiting classes" but the more I hear Petersen repeat this, the more I think he knows we're fucked and this will be a rebuilding process. These kids have obviously not been well-coached and even though Sark's record was shitty, it was a favorable record considering how shitty his teams were. Close wins over shitty teams, multiple blowouts each year where the team had no business being on the same field as the opponents, close wins over really shitty teams, and 3 "Signature wins" (USC twice, and Stanford) that had huge asterisks next to them and could have easily gone the other way (No, I don't count the "god's play" win over a shitty Cal team as a signature win like Kim does).

    I think Pete, a disciplined, old-school football coach, walked into this job the first day and thought "holy shit, what has been going on here?"

    Wrong its his built in excuse to give himself 5 years, u guys will fall 4 anything your saviour says. Really sad scientology has more reasonable followers than this board.
    60-59
    Irony detector exploded.
    Hopefully your gas tank explodes on the freeway
    YBE
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,280 Founders Club
    That Stanford game is really stuck in our heads but will not be representative of the team come season's end.
  • uzi
    uzi Member Posts: 1,298

    I hope his process is better than the one Dan Hawkins used.

    *obligatory*

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    That Stanford game is really stuck in our heads but will not be representative of the team come season's end.

    Profiles in courage from DJ.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,280 Founders Club

    That Stanford game is really stuck in our heads but will not be representative of the team come season's end.

    Profiles in courage from DJ.
    And if we go 7-6 and still struggling on offense then I will be wrong won't I?
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Either way it'll be interesting.
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    I'm taking it that we're not going to see option-centric offense this season.
    SadTrombone.com
  • PostGameOrangeSlices
    PostGameOrangeSlices Member Posts: 27,160
    Peterton can talk about his process all he wants, but that process better fucking process itself into existence quickly.